whatsup?

The Men Who Killed Kennedy

2012-01-28T06:55:00.002-06:00

This 1988-2003 series is on the November 22, 1963 assassination of John F Kennedy in Dallas, Texas.

Dr Mary's Monkey author Ed Haslam

2012-01-26T18:58:00.000-06:00

Ed Haslam says the polio vaccines from the 50’s & 60’s were contaminated with a cancer-causing virus that is sexually transmutable!

This is OUTRAGEOUS!!!

Important Cancer Information

2012-01-23T11:45:00.001-06:00

Today, I asked Judyth about mammograms and here is her reply:

"Of course mammograms just make a cancer worse...and the pressure damages breast tissues...i recommend that women get thermographs rather than mammograms...one friend recently had a lump in her neck detected that way...thermography has no radiation and is safe--and doesn't smash the breast... I have NEVER had a mammogram and NEVER will."

Detecting Breast Cancer Through Thermography ... - Know Cancer
http://www.facebook.com/l/pAQFYf68HAQE5xXDd4d1838-EY75FXhiR2lUrYKEEf6x79A/www.knowcancer.com/cancer-tests-diagnosis/thermography/

The amount of infrared light that an object emits increases with heat. This makes it possible to “visualize” an ... How Can Thermography Detect Breast Cancer? Breast Thermography Imaging - Cancer Tests and Diagnosis
www.knowcancer.com

Detecting Breast Cancer Through Thermography Imaging
Thermography is an infrared imaging technology used to diagnose breast cancer. Infrared imaging utilizes a special camera called a thermograph to detect light in the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Lt Col USASF(Ret) Daniel Marvin 1933-2012

2012-01-20T16:16:00.000-06:00

Daniel Marvin, author of "Expendable Elite - One Soldier's Journey Into Covert Warfare", passed away today, January 20, 2012.

Please listen to his testimony of when he got saved and put his faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.

http://expendableelite.com/

JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters

Can Jim Fetzer be Trusted?

2012-01-17T06:40:00.000-06:00

Nope.

Below are a couple of audio clips of the Bob Tuskin show in which he allows Jim Fetzer to divert attention away from the evidence. And that is what a coverup is all about.

In the second clip Dr Wood says, "“I would like to make one comment here for the listeners who are wondering about the exchange there. I haven’t spoken to Jim Fetzer in well over 3 years nor emailed with him nor corresponded with him in any way because he threatened me.”

To learn more about Dr Wood's amazing research: http://drjudywood.com/

Shaq Show Off His Masonic Ring

2012-01-11T11:37:00.000-06:00

Witchcraft with a bow - that's my definition of the religion of Freemasonry.

From one comment...

"Since Freemasonry has a plan of salvation it is absurd to deny that Freemasonry is a religion. Many Masons deny that Freemasonry is a religion because if they were to admit it, they would not be accepted as Christians and church members. Other Masons are so blinded by Satan that they cannot see the truth.Freemasonry teaches men to imitate Hiram Abiff, so that they may get into heaven. The Gospel of Jesus Christ requires faith in the person and claims of Jesus Christ as the means of being redeemed from the death of sin and getting into heaven."

http://www.emfj.org/religion.htm

"Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion, and its teachings are instructions in ... the universal, eternal, immutable religion...." Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, by Albert Pike, Washington D.C., 1958, pp. 213, 219.

That God is One, immutable, unchangeable, infinitely just and good; that Light will finally overcome Darkness, -- Good conquer Evil, and Truth be victor over Error; -- these, rejecting all the wild and useless speculations of the Zend-Avesta, the Kabalah, the Gnostics. and the Schools, are the religion and Philosophy of Masonry. (p. 275)

Masonry propagates no creed except its own most simple and Sublime One; that universal religion, taught by Nature and by Reason. (p. 718)

"[Masonry is] ... the custodian and depository (since Enoch) of the great philosophical and religious truths, unknown to the world at large...." Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, by Albert Pike, Washington D.C., 1958, p. 210.

"Without this religious element it would scarcely be worthy of cultivation by the wise and good...." An Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, by Albert G. Mackey, 1921, pp. 618-619.

"...a worship in which all good men may unite..." by Joseph Newton

"...a religious institution..." by Albert Mackey

Freemasonry is not Christianity, nor a substitute for it. It does not meddle with sectarian creeds or doctrines, but teaches fundamental religious truth." (Albert G. Mackey, "Encyclopedia of Freemasonry," page 162)

"The religion of Masonry is pure theism."

"The truth is that Masonry is undoubtedly a religious institution . . . which,
handed down through a long succession of ages from that ancient priesthood who first
taught it, embraces the great tenets of the existence of God and the immortality of the soul." Albert G. Mackey, , p. 95

Look at its ancient landmarks, its sublime ceremonies, its profound symbols and
allegories-all inculcating religious observance, and teaching religious truth, and who
can deny that it is eminently a religious institution? . . . Masonry, then, is indeed a
religious institution; and on this ground mainly, if not alone, should the religious
Mason defend it Albert G. Mackey, , p.619

"Masonry is the universal religion only because and sl long as it embraces all religions" by J.D. Buck

From another Comment...

...most local police (and all other) unions, for that matter – and especially the larger FOP (Fraternal Order of Police) are pretty much all infiltrated at the highest levels by Masons and other such related “brotherhoods”, Shriners, Knights of Columbus, etc.

It’s interesting, too, that when Shaq was in AZ to play for the Suns, he joined as a reserve deputy in the local Sheriff’s Posse – just as he does a reserve officer thing in Miami, too. So, there’s that, for those who don’t know that world, and I’m sure most do not. Shaq’s thing, I’m sure, is in large part just about PR, but there is certainly a Freemason / law enforcement connection to consider here.

Like any other profession, the many regular guys and ladies who just do those jobs aren’t necessarily bad or evil, and to those “members” it’s just more or less a bar or club where they hang out, drink and BS with their fellow employees, like a VFW, Elks or Moose lodge.

But, anyone say Lieutenant and above is definitely either “in the club” or a willing puppet and would never speak or act against it…they already know the deal by then, and the price they will pay if they go against the powers that be.

It is just the way it is – just as anyone who gets to a certain level in politics, entertainment, mass media, university academics, CEOs, etc…..it’s generally understood that you join or you simply won’t be allowed to hold a position with that level of power. Not to mention that the vast majority who get there tend to already agree on most of their views, goals, sprituality / lack thereof, etc. Evil minds definitely tend to think alike, as if possessed by the same spirit, you might say…literally.

And for those who might dare to resist…it’s join or die, basically when you arrive at that level. This is always how the secret societies have operated, by design – ranging from the basic “Greek” frat groups up to Skull and Bones, Club of Rome, Trilateral Comm/CFR, RIIA, CIA, etc. The concept is identical – the initiation begins early on with your “brothers” sharing and knowing the dirty secrets about one other, so that they are, therefore, “bonded” together by being compromised.

It is Satan’s twisted version of “trusting”, as we would think of it with a friend or family – but, of course, it is exactly the opposite – a mutual threat of blackmail and extortion is not trust, faith or love, as it is with God’s ways.

SOURCE: http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/shaq-shows-off-masonic-ring-on-tv-video/

For Such a Time as This

2012-01-10T06:49:00.001-06:00

Yesterday's sunrise taken at the Grand Lagoon marina bridge, Panama City Beach, Florida.

Like Esther who was put into a situation for a specific but unknown at the time reason, the LORD puts us in various places "for such a time as this".

And in His mercy and wisdom, He doesn't always reveal the details of why to us as we walk on the path He provides.

Thus it can be a difficult, challenging journey.

Nevertheless, He is the Potter and we are the clay.

Our trust and obedience to the LORD Jesus Christ is our role as we reprove the unfruitful works of darkness, refrain our tongue from evil and speak words of truth.

Strange Fire

2012-01-07T08:42:00.000-06:00

These days, I'm reading a chapter a day through the Bible and this morning, I read Leviticus 10 which tells how two of Aaron's sons were killed because they offered strange fire before the LORD.

Right after, I read an email from a friend which included a link to The Tabernacle Tour: http://www.thetabernacletour.com/index.html.

When I randomly clicked on The Complete Tabernacle Tour, I found it very interesting that this popped up on my screen!

Today, the Bride has gone after ‘strange fire’ types of teaching like:
 A self centered ‘health and wealth’ doctrine;
 The ‘Kingdom Now’ teaching of trying to bring the Kingdom of God to earth through the political process;
 A ‘social gospel’ without the Cross or preaching the Cross without love and social involvement
 A “rapture” that pulls all Christians out of the world before the Great Tribulation
 “At will” trips to heaven and spirit travel
Truth taken out of context or embellished is heresy. The truth of Scripture taken out of context or not balanced with other passages can lead to heresy. Throughout history heresy has come in all forms of ‘strange fire’ types of teachings that are at the expense of preaching and teaching a balanced, whole Biblical Gospel. ‘Strange fire’ is a heretical teaching that subverts, distorts or perverts solid Biblical doctrine.

Here are verses 1-5 of Leviticus 10:
"And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered strange fire before the LORD, which he commanded them not. And there went out fire from the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD. Then Moses said unto Aaron, This [is it] that the LORD spake, saying, I will be sanctified in them that come nigh me, and before all the people I will be glorified. And Aaron held his peace. And Moses called Mishael and Elzaphan, the sons of Uzziel the uncle of Aaron, and said unto them, Come near, carry your brethren from before the sanctuary out of the camp. So they went near, and carried them in their coats out of the camp; as Moses had said."

May the LORD Jesus Christ always keep us on the right path and away from all strange fire I pray.

Judyth Vary Baker and Lee Harvey Oswald

2012-01-04T07:04:00.001-06:00

LINKS
http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/

https://www.facebook.com/Judyth.vary.baker?ref=pymk

http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/meandleeorderhere.html

http://meandlee.com/

Disturbing Big Brother News

2011-12-28T06:33:00.001-06:00

http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/street-cams-can-now-tag-track-and-follow-individuals-video/

Street Cams Can Now Tag, Track and Follow Individuals (video)
By VC | December 27th, 2011 | Category: Latest News | 26 comments

The dystopian nightmare described in George Orwell’s novel 1984 took place in London, UK. This very city is today one of the most heavily monitored places in the world, using a record number of cameras and the most advanced surveillance technology to keep track of its citizens. Reuters now reports that the CCTV system of London has now the ability to tag specific people, track them across the entire system and even run a “search” on them for previous footage.

The report basically praises the software and quickly dismisses the privacy concerns it raises, stating that most citizens approve of being monitored (I’d like to see a scientific survey proving this). Of course, this summer’s London Riots were mentioned as an excuse to implement this technology, as anticipated in my article entitled The London Riots and How They Will be Used to the Elite’s Advantage.

--- end --

How does a person read/see this stuff and not be deeply concerned? Truly, our ONLY HOPE is found in faith in the LORD Jesus Christ. Come what may, the peace of God only comes when we have peace WITH God:

"Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God. And not only [so], but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience; And patience, experience; and experience, hope: And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us."
Romans 5:1-5

William Cooper (1943-2001): Scarlet and the Beast

2011-12-26T09:28:00.000-06:00

QUOTE: Deceit is at the heart of Freemasonry, according to the greatest Freemason of all time, Albert Pike. In fact, in "Morals and Dogma", Pike writes that in the Blue Degrees, the initiate is intentionally misled. Something more than deception binds the initiate when he takes the blood oaths. Oswald Worth, a well-known 33rd Degree French Grand Lodge Mason confirms in his book, "The Ideal Initiate", 1927, that the act of taking the Masonic oath is, in fact, selling one's soul to the devil.

William Cooper

William Cooper - Scarlet and the Beast Transcribed Part 1 of 5

THE HOUR OF THE TIME
Tape No. 457: "The Identity of Scarlet #1"
Monday, October 10, 1994

Tonight, folks, we're going to really twist your ears. I hope you have been listening to this broadcast long enough to understand what I'm talking about. Some of you new listeners may get lost. All I can say is if you get lost, buy the tapes of the series on Mystery Babylon and some of the other broadcasts that we've done which lays the groundwork for what you're going to hear tonight, for it's important.

And I know, I get letters from some of you that say you're tired of hearing this stuff. And do you know what? Frankly, my dear Scarlet, I just don't give a damn; because if you're tired of hearing it, and you don't understand it, then you're still in sheeple-land because you can't fight an enemy if you don't know who the enemy is, and what they believe, and what their goals are.

Don't go away, folks, because we're going to pin some labels on some skunks.

In Zechariah, Chapter 1, Verses 18 through 21, it says this. And I quote:

[Zechariah 1:18-21]

Verse 18: Then lifted I up mine eyes, and saw, and behold four horns.

Verse 19: And I said unto the angel that talked with me, What be these? And he answered me, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, Israel, and Jerusalem.

Verse 20: And the Lord shewed me four carpenters.

Verse 21: Then said I, What come these to do? And he spake, saying, ...these are come to fray them, to cast out the horns of the Gentiles, which lifted up their horn over the land of Judah to scatter it.

End quote. Now, Zechariah describes two mysterious entities at war: the horns of the Gentiles against the four carpenters.

The horns are responsible for scattering the twelve tribes of Israel throughout the world.

The carpenters retaliate with revolution, to cast out the horns and emancipate the Jews.

Dr. E. Shryler English, the editor of the journal called "Our Hope" during the 1940s and 1950s; and Marion Bishop Bower, the professor at Philadelphia School--now College--of Bible, comment on the meaning of the word "horns" [Hebrew: geren] in prophecy. Quote:

"In the Bible, horns speak of power, often, the power of a Gentile king."

End quote. The first Biblical record of a Gentile king was Nimrod. Nimrod. And we've discussed this king many, many times on this hour. He was known as "the mighty one" who built Babylon. Archaeologists have discovered that this monarch wore a crown of bull horns, which may be the reason scripture has since identified a world power by this symbol.

You see, Nimrod's system of rule was to unite religion with politics--sound familiar?--thus inaugurating what is known as the Babylonian system. This can be found in Genesis, Chapter 10, Verses 8 and 10; and Chapter 11, Verses 2 through 4. They give us a brief history of Mystery Babylon's beginning. And I quote:

[Genesis 10:8, 10]

Verse 8: And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.

Verse 10: And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.

Which is Babylonia.

[Genesis 11:2, 4]

Verse 2: And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east,...they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.

Verse 4: And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

End quote. The city, ladies and gentlemen, stands for the political or civil power of the king; and the tower represents the king's divine, or religious, power.

You see--I have discussed this before with you--in the Bible, what you are reading are metaphors.

In ancient pagan religions, the king united both powers. Nimrod's Babylonian system formed the pattern by which all kingdoms afterwards would be governed; that is, with religion and state united.

Many centuries later, a Babylonian king named Nebuchadnezzar would be the first to lift up his horn over the land of Judah. Nebuchadnezzar is the first of these four historic horned powers mentioned by Zechariah. The other three powers were Medo-Persia, Greece, and of course, Rome.

Both English and Bower suggest that Zechariah's "four carpenters" were workmen, perhaps carvers, or smiths, workers in iron. God wanted to make clear that He has an instrument to destroy every power that works against Him. The workmen, you see, were to crush the world powers that had scattered both Judah and Israel, and which were determined to wipe them out.

What, in fact, these two Bible commentators have just described, is a Masonic revolution. "Carpenter", as we know, is a synonym for "mason". Masonic symbols display the tools of carpenters--such as the square and compass--which is the chief symbol of Freemasonry.

The French Masonic Revolution, a working-man's uprising, was the first to destroy a modern Gentile kingdom and fully emancipate the Jews. French Freemasonry was also the first to form workers' unions, using the force of strikes to paralyze a nation.

The 1848 and 1871 French Masonic Revolutions were both organized from 500 workers' unions. Likewise, the 1905 Grand Orient Bolsheviks coordinated over 1,600 strikes involving a million men and women in St. Petersburg in Russia.

Almighty God inspired Zechariah to use "carpenters" [geren] as the word to represent four Masonic conspiracies against four Gentile world powers.

In Hebrew, "carpenter" [geren] literally means "mason". Furthermore, the Hebrew primitive root, figuratively, describes a masonic conspiracy, quote:

"To devise; hence, to be silent, to let alone, conceal, practice secretly, keep silent, be silent, speak not a word, be still, hold tongue."

End quote. A derivative of the prime root defines "carpenter" as a Mystery Religion. Quote:

"Magical craft; also silence, cunning, secretly."

End quote. When the prime root is capitalized, it means, quote:

"A Levite."

End quote--which the Masonic Scottish Rite, or so-called Jewish Rite, claims as one of its titles.

Another derivative of the primitive root means, quote:

"Spiritually deaf."

End quote. Ha! Which deceived Freemasons certainly are.

The action taken by the four carpenters in the passage from Zechariah was to fray and cast out the Gentile powers. "Fray" [Hebrew: charad], ladies and gentlemen, in Hebrew means, quote:

"To shudder with terror."

End quote. The four carpenters could represent four modern Masonic revolutions that have actually terrorized and dethroned four Gentile kingdoms that have persecuted the Jews.

In fact, terrorism, which is suggested by the Hebrew word for "fray" [charad], has been the tool used in all Grand Orient-style revolutions. Indeed, the kings of Europe shuddered with terror when the French Revolution began, as did Frenchmen, during the "Reign of Terror", and Russians during what is known as the "Red Terror". You've all heard these terms.

English and Bower also state that the four horns refer specifically to Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome.

Daniel, Chapter 2, also prophesies the rise and fall of these four powers. According to Daniel, the fourth declines but will never cease to exist. Instead, it divides into legs: Constantine's Eastern and Western Empire; and then divides further into ten toes.

Daniel, Chapter 7, Verse 7, describes the ten toes as a beast with ten horns.

Revelation, Chapter 13, Verse 1, also describes the beast as having ten horns.

Both are the very same beast.

Many would say "the end time beast". But even in the Bible, and even in the books of prophecy, it will not be the end. Anyone who uses the term "the end time", or "the end of the world", or "the end of the earth", or "the end of time", or "the end of the universe", are all lying.

Many Bible commentators refer to the ten toes and ten horns as the revived Roman Empire, which they believe will include ten European nations at the end of this age, which is the proper term to use.

We could possibly understand the fourth horn mentioned by Zechariah as indeed the horn of the Roman Empire. But of Rome, as it extended to medieval Europe where the old Roman Empire became known as the "Holy Roman Empire", Europe's Babylonian system of united church and state continued to be governed--spiritually, at least--by Rome.

The like old Rome, the Holy Roman Empire was rabidly anti-semitic. Not until the violent carpenter revolutions began 300 years ago, was the Roman horn of the Gentile kings cast out, and Jews became emancipated.

Now, perhaps Zechariah's four carpenters represent the four major Masonic revolutions documented throughout history.

English, 1688.

The American, 1776.

The French in 1789.

And the Russian in 1917.

Not only did these four revolutions emancipate the Jews in their wake, they also prepared the ground for Israel's revival as a nation in 1948.

You see, we can trace the stages of this movement. France gave full emancipation to the Jews in 1791. Russia gave birth to the Zionist movement in the latter half of the nineteenth century. England gave Palestine to the Zionists following World War I. And America guarantees Israel's survival today.

These four carpenter revolutions fought against the Babylonian system that united religion with crown. Revelation 17 refers to this system as:

"MYSTERY BABYLON ... THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS...."

At the time the revolutions began, the Harlot was headquartered at Rome. Where, dear listeners, is her headquarters today? And that is the subject of tonight's broadcast, and if necessary, tomorrow night's and the night after. And then, when we have identified Scarlet, we will identify the Beast.

You see, the actual location of Mystery Babylon in place, time, and religion or church has fascinated an awful lot of people. The history of the Scarlet's travels reveals that as world kingdoms have marched westward, so in tandem have Satan's headquarters advanced.

Revelation 18 discloses that Scarlet's religion controls kings, commerce, and politics. Satan's seat, therefore, must be established at the center of a dominant world power where crown and religion have never been separated.

Following what is known as "The Great Flood", Satan set up his seat of power at Babylon.

When Christ walked the earth, Satan was headquartered at Jerusalem.

When the Adversary was unable to crush Christianity at its source, Rev. Clarence Larkin in "The Book of Revelation" 1919, suggests that Satan followed the church to continue his incessant war against her. Thus, Satan's center of operation transferred to Pergamos, Asia Minor--at that time, the western edge of the Christian movement. And most of you have never even heard of it.

Satan's apparent intent was to block further missionary outreach westward to the continent of Europe. In Revelation, Chapter 2, Verse 13, Christ speaks of Satan dwelling at Pergamos, and he says, quote:

[Revelation 2:13:]

"I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan's seat is, and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth."

End quote. Each westward move of the church has been accompanied by Satan and his harlot religion.

Now, bear in mind, if you've been listening to this broadcast for some time, when I talk about Satan, I'm talking about a group of people who practice a Mystery Religion and believe in a certain philosophy.

Satan and his harlot religion, ladies and gentlemen, are known, and have been revealed on this broadcast, as Mystery Babylon. Thus, when the Roman Empire was the dominant kingdom, Satan left Pergamos for Rome and Scarlet, Mystery Babylon, followed.

The Apostle Peter's reference to Babylon, in I Peter, Chapter 5, Verse 13, indicates that the early Christians were aware that Mystery Babylon had located there. Quote:

[I Peter 5:13:]

"The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you;...."

End quote. Rev. Hislop, in his marvelous work--fantastic research, I recommend it to everyone listening: it's called--"The Two Babylons" published in 1916, which was subtitled "The Papal Worship Proved to be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife", lends his entire research to the premise that Mystery Babylon took up permanent residence in the church at Rome--something that I have confirmed for you in my own research, and have illuminated your minds with that fact.

Hislop states that:

"It has always been easy to show that the church which has its seat and headquarters on the seven hills of Rome might most appropriately be called "Babylon", in as much as it is the chief seat of idolatry unto the New Testament as the ancient Babylon was the chief seat of idolatry unto the Old."

Unquote. Rev. Clarence Larkin was of the same opinion. Larkin claims that the descriptions of the seven churches of Revelation, Chapters 2 and 3: Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamos, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea, are prophecies of church history. He suggests that Mystery Babylon traveled from Babylon to Pergamos; then from Pergamos to Rome.

Larkin asserts that the period of dominance of Roman Catholicism in church history is prophesied in Revelation, Chapter 2, Verses 18 and 19, which addresses the church in Thyatira.

Bible commentators, English and Bower, held that same opinion in their annotations to the Pilgrim Edition of the Holy Bible. You see, they noted that the word "Thyatira" means "continual sacrifice". They linked this meaning of "Thyatira" with the main act of worship of the Catholic Church: the sacrifice of the mass, which is a continual ordinance within the Roman Church.

In Revelation, Chapter 2, Verses 20 through 23, Christ, through the Apostle John, issues a severe condemnation of the church at Thyatira, and he says this, quote:

[Revelation 2:20-23]

Verse 20: Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.

Verse 21: And I gave her space to repent of her fornication: and she repented not.

Verse 22: Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.

Verse 23: And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.

Clarence Larkin identifies that woman Jezebel and the church of Thyatira with the Jezebel of Israel. He writes this--and this is very interesting. Quote:

"Jezebel, the wife of Ahab, was not by birth a daughter of Abraham, but a princess of idolatrous Tyre, at a time, too, when its royal family was famed for cruel savagery and intense devotion to Baal and Astarte. Ahab, King of Israel, to strengthen his kingdom, married Jezebel; and she, aided and abetted by Ahab, introduced the licentious worship of Baal into Israel and killed all the prophets of the Lord she could lay her hands on."

"Now, there is no question that whether Jezebel was a real person in the church or not, she typified a system, and that system was the papal church. When the papal church introduced images and pictures into its churches for the people to bow down to, it became idolatrous. And when it set up its claims that the teaching of the church is superior to the Word of God, it assumed the role of prophetess. And a careful study of the papal systems from A.D. 606 to the Reformation A.D. 1520, with its institution of the sacrifice of the mass and other pagan rites, reveals in it the sway of Jezebelism. It was also a period of Jezebelistic persecution, as seen in the wars of the Crusades and the rise of what we know today as the Inquisition."

End quote. Now, remember, that's his opinion. But it seems indisputable that Rome, at that time the mightiest power on earth, was the headquarters of the Babylonian religion.

Rome, however, is not the greatest power today. Make no mistake. Yet, Alexander Hislop leaves the Mother Harlot in the Roman Church, while his contemporary, Clarence Larkin, terminates Jezebelism around 1520 A.D.

William R. Goats, in "Apocalypse Next", a book listing incredible indications that long-prophesied cataclysmic events are coming upon the earth, attempts to locate Mystery Babylon's present headquarters by looking for the seat of a religion which permits all other religions to join her fellowship. And this, ladies and gentlemen, when you find the identity of this religion--this church--you will find the true and real identity of Mystery Babylon.

"Quite apparently,..."

says Goats

"...no one religion, like Protestantism, or Islam, or Catholicism, could get all other religions to join it, though many such attempts have been, and are being, made."

And he is right. Unquestionably, whatever religion it is, it will have to have a strong appeal--far stronger than the appeal of watered-down Christianity today, which in fact, is not Christianity at all.

Goats suggests that this religion will include the occultic practices, such as black magic, seances, demon contact, miracles, witchcraft, sorcery, and of course, the old standby, astrology.

He then provides yet another criterion to help discover the present-day Mother of Harlots: proper biblical interpretation, which demands that the first use of a term in scripture be followed in every single successive use, and not change the meaning according to what you want to believe. And if you do this, you soon confirm that we are close to solving the mystery of what religion the Harlot could possibly represent.

Now, many of you listening to tonight's broadcast who may believe that this is a religious program, let me set you straight. It is not.

I have given you the identity of Mystery Babylon many, many, many times in the past, in many different languages, using many different illustrations, facts, history, documents. There is no doubt about it. Tonight, I am merely going about it in a different tack, using the book that many of you believe is absolutely, one hundred percent true. And if it is, it will make this same identification. And if we use the Book of Revelation, I can guarantee you it will, because I gave you another revelation during my many broadcasts on the revelations of the identity of this power. So, make sure that you listen carefully, ladies and gentlemen; for in the next few nights, or maybe the next week or week-and-a-half, you're going to be amazed.

You see, applying Goats's formula to scripture, we know that ancient Babylon was also the Mother of Harlots; and that the Whore of Babylon was also the Mother of Harlots. You see, ancient Babylon produced this thing called the Mother of Harlots. And the Whore of Babylon was also the Mother of Harlots. And that indicates that she has many offspring. She is not an offspring or child herself, but the original mother of all false religions.

Does that ring any bells?

Applying Goats's criteria to the Catholic Church, we discover that the Church at Rome could never have been Mystery Babylon, the Mother of Harlots, since her roots were not at Babylon. Nor could she have been an offspring. For example, Thyatira, which Clarence Larkin claims is prophetic of Roman Catholicism, was one of our Lord's seven churches and not an offspring of the Harlot.

Christ, himself, recognized Thyatira as his own. He did not call her the Mother of Harlots, but he did condemn her for fornication with Jezebel, which is representative of her idolatry with the Mother Harlot.

We find a similar case of idolatry in the Old Testament. You see, Jeremiah 3 records that God divorced Israel for whoring after Babylonian deities.

The Jews had previously fallen into the same sin as the Christians at Rome. Is Israel Mystery Babylon, too? Of course not. Yet, Mystery Babylon did, ladies and gentlemen, pass through her. Likewise Mystery Babylon is passed through the Roman Church, but the Roman Church is not herself the Mother of Harlots.

If you've listened to my entire series called "Mystery Babylon", or the Mystery Series, then you know exactly what I'm talking about. For Mystery Babylon has resided, and in some ways, still resides in these institutions. But these institutions did not begin as Mystery Babylon, and certainly are not the head of Mystery Babylon at the present time.

In our day, ladies and gentlemen, the Harlot must be a Mystery Religion with roots in Babylon. The roots must be in Babylon and it must be a Mystery Religion, for in the book known as the Bible, it is called "Mystery Babylon". It has to be a religion that is known as the Mother of all modern harlot religions. Her form of worship, however, is not the only criterion for identification.

Remember, we're identifying Scarlet from the Book of Revelations. Revelations 17 and Chapter 18 gives us further clues about her. In the last days, it says, before her destruction by fire, she must be in control of kings, commerce, finance, and big business on an international scale. The Roman Church lost that control during the last three centuries of political revolutions.

A powerful world-wide order does comply with the criteria provided by Goats and indicated by scripture. The Mother Harlot, or Scarlet, is a Mystery Religion, admitting so in her own secret publications.

You see, since 1717, all modern cults, secret societies, and false religions organized in the Western world, had issued from her womb. All religions older than she can join her ranks without discrimination. Other indications are that her associates, her lovers, are the rulers of governments. Her hierarchy controls world banking, commerce, and industry; and most significantly, she commands the illicit manufacture and trafficking of drugs to all nations.

Are you beginning to get a glimmer?

This mysterious entity, not tied to any religious system yet allowing all to join her ranks, operates on her own in the maturity of the Mother Harlot. Presenting herself as a Judeo-Christian organization, she has all the markings of Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots, and claims in her own publications to originate at Babel. She is not headquartered at Rome, but has moved much farther west.

We can trace her movement by means of Revelation 18, Verse 24, quote:

[Revelation 18:24:]

"And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth."

End quote. Her final goal is a universal brotherhood, governed by a global political system under her idolatrous command. She is the Harlot of Revelation riding upon the political Beast. Her exit from the Catholic Church began with the Protestant Reformation, and Martin Luther's personal seal was the emblem of the Rosy Cross.

The Protestant Reformation and carpenter revolutions of our modern era, which had their beginnings three centuries ago, were the only avenues of escape from the progressively despotic Roman church which was in union with equally despotic European kings in what is called "the Old World Order".

You see, to have a New World Order, we must have had an Old World Order, and that is it. Together, they had created for their subjects such untenable conditions that a New World Order was soon to throw off the yoke of oppression. The duration of the Roman Church's entanglement with worldly empires recalls the words of Christ in Revelation, Chapter 2, Verses 21 through 23, to the Catholic Church at Thyatira. Quote:

[Revelation 2:21-23]

Verse 21: And I gave her space to repent of her fornication: and she repented not.

Verse 22: Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.

Verse 23: And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.

End quote. Christ's prophecy of tribulation for the Thyatira church age has been fulfilled. The savagery of the Inquisitions, performed in the name of Jesus Christ by vain and pompous popes, made barbarians look like gentle lambs. As a result, pagans who had converted to Christianity for convenience began to form secret societies to protect themselves. The Protestants fought in the open. Thus, the Reformation arose from not only Protestant Christians but protesting pagans as well.

When Mystery Babylon could no longer control the Vatican, she exited the Catholic Church during the Reformation and buried her conspiracy in secret societies with the intent of destroying the church through political revolution. These secret societies had existed since the days of ancient Babylon, but never had they penetrated the European continent--at least not as far as religion was concerned, the religion of Christianity--until the Crusades.

Freemasonry became the largest and most enduring secret society to house Mystery Babylon. Through Masonic Lodges, the Whore of Babylon achieved her revolutionary goals. The Little Masonic Library readily admits that, quote:

"In the Reformation, Masonry severed its connection with Catholicism."

End quote. In another place, the "Little Masonic Library" acknowledges Freemasonry's birth with the Reformation. Quote:

"Indeed, we have not duly considered how truly Masonry, in its modern form, was a child of the Reformation, allied as it was with the movement or group of movements, out of which came the freedom of he peoples, the liberty of conscience and the independence of manhood."

End quote. And remember, their goal from the beginning was to destroy all existing religions, destroy all existing governments, and shackle the mob.

What was to come out of this? A one-world government ruled by them.

Who is "them"? They are the ones identified by the number 666; those who have fulfilled the three degrees in six acts of the initiation of Mystery Babylon.

We know that Clarence Larkin terminates Jezebelism, or Mystery Babylon, in the Catholic Church around 1520 A.D. It was during this time, 1534, that King Henry VIII insisted that Parliament replace the Catholic Church in England with the Church of England. Every British monarch since has usurped the position of the Pope as head of the State Church.

In 1688, the English Masonic "Glorious Revolution" did not alter the King's position. Instead, Freemasonry took control of the church. British Journalist Stephen Knight confirms that, quote:

"The Church of England has been a stronghold of Freemasonry for more than 200 years."

End quote. In the 1950s, the Archbishop of Canterbury, sixteen bishops, and more than five hundred Anglican priests were Freemasons.

French Freemason, Marius Lepage, in "Le Symbolism", October 1953, said, quote:

"It is absolutely useless for a Frenchman to try to understand English Masonry unless he realizes that the Crown, the Anglican Church, and the United Grand Lodge of England, are one-god-in-three-persons."

End quote. What Jesus Christ condemned in the Church at Rome, the Church of England embraced.

On June 24th, 1717, four London Masonic Lodges united in the Grand Lodge; then established the claim that English Freemasonry is rooted at Babylon, with Nimrod as its founder.

This is written in their own words. It is their own admission. It is not something that someone else took and put in their mouth. It is a fact. This is also the date Freemasonry purports that the Catholic Church began to lose its hold on kingdoms.

In speaking to the Grand Orient Convention at Paris in 1902, Grand Master Delpeck said, quote:

"The Church of Rome, based on the Galilean myth, began to decline rapidly from the very day on which the Masonic Association was established."

End quote. In 1737, English Freemasonry established the tradition of making her kings honorary heads of the Grand Lodge. This move, in effect, made British monarchs priest-kings of modern Mystery Babylon. And to this very day, England has never wavered from her Babylonian system.

Even when French Freemasonry forced the separation of church and state in all its revolutions, English Freemasonry remains in control of church and state to this day.

In summary, Zechariah's fourth horn, the Roman Empire, represents the Babylonian monarchical system of rule extended to medieval Europe under which Jews suffered. And when the European horns were cast out by the carpenter revolutions, Jews were emancipated. Church was separated from state, and the Babylonian system shifted from Rome to London.

The greatest book of prophecy in the Bible promises a special blessing to those who read it, understand it, and do those things written therein, according to Revelation, Chapter 1, Verse 3.

In this book, the account of the two Masonic conspiracies--in the text referred to as Mystery Babylon and the Beast--is prophesied. You see, there are two powers. The history and end time destruction of Mystery Babylon is recorded in Revelation 17 and 18.

In Chapter 17, Verses 1 through 9, the Apostle John describes Scarlet as shown to him by Jesus Christ. Now, remember, he is describing Scarlet. And remember, there are really three factions warring against each other: one is certain to be a member of one of the other two or both, always, because that is the only way it can continue to exist. So, in effect, we see two powers, warring against each other, and a third, jealous of the power of the other two but skipping back and forth according to whichever helps it the most, has managed to survive, and will, in fact, seat its representative upon the throne of the world eventually, according to my research.

Now, here's Apostle John, describing Scarlet as shown to him by Jesus Christ in Revelation 17 and 18, and this is Revelation 17, Verses 1 through 9 [sic, verses 1b-7 and 9]. Quote:

[Revelation 17:1b-7:]

Verse 1: ...I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:

Verse 2: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.

Verse 3: So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.

Verse 4: And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:

Verse 5: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

Verse 6: And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.

Verse 7: And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.

[Revelation 17:9]

"And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth."

End quote. That Scarlet's worship is hidden in mystery or eastern mysticism is agreed to by William Goats in "Apocalypse Next". Goats states that modern Mystery Babylon will not be a church of watered-down Christianity, but rather must be a secret organization which practices what he calls "witchcraft".

A close look at the Greek of the scripture text above confirms this interpretation of Mystery Babylon. You see, the Greek word for "mystery" [Greek: musterion] means, quote:

"To shut the mouth; a secret through the idea of silence imposed by initiation into religious rites."

End quote. This definition concurs with the meaning of the Hebrew word for "carpenters" [Hebrew: charash] in Zechariah's vision at the beginning of the chapter. Quote:

"To devise--in a bad sense; hence, from the idea of secrecy, to be silent, to let alone, conceal, practice secretly, keep silence, be silent, speak not a word, be still, hold tongue."

End quote. The initiation into religious rites and all Babylonian Mystery Religion includes taking blood oaths of silence. For those who take the oaths, if one is to believe their veracity, a cruel death is administered if silence is not maintained.

For illustration, we shall consider the consequences of taking the Masonic oaths in each of the first three degrees of Freemasonry. At the end of the initiation, the candidate swears to keep all Masonic secrets:

"...binding myself under no less penalty than that of having my throat cut across, tongue torn out by its roots, breast torn open, heart plucked out, body severed in twain, bowels taken from thence, should I ever knowingly violate this my solemn obligation."

After the oath is taken, the Worshipful Master of the Lodge says to the Senior Deacon:

"He is bound to us by an obligation, a tie stronger than human hands can impose."

Who imposes this inhuman tie but Satan, the Master Deceiver?

James, Chapter 5, Verse 12, warns Christians against taking such secret oaths because they are deception:

[James 5:12:]

"But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation."

The Greek word for the type of condemnation of which James speaks [Greek: hupokrisis] means "deceit, lies, deception, manipulation"--what I have warned you against all this time. And I have identified them without the use of the Bible over and over and over again and now I nail it down, and it is used in this sense only once in all the New Testament.

Deceit is at the heart of Freemasonry, according to the greatest Freemason of all time, Albert Pike. In fact, in "Morals and Dogma", Pike writes that in the Blue Degrees, the initiate is intentionally misled. Something more than deception binds the initiate when he takes the blood oaths.

Oswald Worth, a well-known 33rd Degree French Grand Lodge Mason confirms in his book, "The Ideal Initiate", 1927, that the act of taking the Masonic oath is, in fact, selling one's soul to the devil. And I quote:

"It is a serious matter to ask for initiation, for one has to sign a pact which demands that the man's soul be truly committed in the act. It is not, then, like driving a bargain with the devil, in which the Evil One allows himself to be tricked. It is an agreement entered into seriously on both the devil's and the initiate's sides, and there is no escape from its clauses. The initiate, himself, is, by that very fact, indissolubly bound to his Masters. It would all be nothing if you could ask to be initiated free of all obligation without paying with your very soul."

End quote. Revelation, Chapter 18, Verses 11 and 13, confirms the Mystery Babylon "buyeth...the souls of men." This purchase is made by Satan through the initiate's own blood when he takes the Masonic oath.

Anyone who is listening, who is bound by their oath in Freemasonry, the Apostle Paul says in I Corinthians, Chapter 6, Verse 20, that already your souls, quote:

[I Corinthians 6:20:]

"...are bought with a price:...."

End quote. And that price is the precious blood of Jesus Christ. See also, I Peter, Chapter 1, Verses 18 through 19.

You have committed a grievous sin when you took the Masonic oath. God, however, is merciful. He will forgive you if you ask him. And he will renew you to the joy of your salvation if you repent. That is, if you turn away, whole-heartedly, body and soul, from Freemasonry.

Good night, dear listeners. And God bless you all.

Ladies and gentlemen, tonight's broadcast is taken in part from "Scarlet and the Beast", Chapter 25.

Linus Tells What Christmas is all About

2011-12-21T06:53:00.000-06:00

Linus quotes Luke 2:8-14
http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Luk&c=2&v=1&t=KJV#1

The 1963 Coup d’Etat/LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK

2011-12-14T14:49:00.000-06:00

The LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK

By Morrow321 - Wednesday January 5, 2011 - 9:42 pm

http://www.austinpost.org/content/the-lbj-cia-assassination-jfk

Lyndon Johnson made a dirty deal with CIA Republicans to murder John Kennedy in the 1963 Coup d’Etat. (People like Clint Murchison Sr., H.L. Hunt, Nelson Rockefeller, David Rockefeller, top Nelson Rockefeller aide Henry Kissinger, George Herbert Walker Bush and Gen. Edward Lansdale all are excellent candidates for elite sponsorship.) Lyndon Johnson and Allen Dulles may very well have been co-CEOs of the JFK assassination; with the CIA in charge of the killing of JFK, and Lyndon Johnson and (his close friend and neighbor of 19 years in Washington, DC) FBI director J. Edgar Hoover in charge of the cover up.

Clint Murchison, Sr – more so than even H.L. Hunt – was a key player in the JFK assassination because of his close ties to the inner core of US intelligence (Allen Dulles, Nelson Rockefeller, John J. McCloy), close ties to Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, bankers Rockefellers; Murchison was even friends with key Kennedy-hater mafia godfather Carlos Marcellos of New Orleans. Not only that, Murchison, Sr. was a patient and partner of Dr. Alton Oschner, the former president of the American Cancer Society and who ran covert cancer research for the CIA. Oschner, likewise was a Kennedy-hater. John Simkin: “One of Ochsner's friends described him as being ‘like a fundamentalist preacher in the sense that the fight against communism was the only subject that he would talk about, or even allow you to talk about, in his presence.”

When JFK was slaughtered, Russia’s Khrushchev was literally crying, fearing nuclear war. Cuba’s Castro worried and feared an US invasion and gave an impressive speech the next day deconstructing the CIA’s deception provocation for war. Meanwhile at Clint Murchison’s home, their family maid May Newman describes the scene: “The mood in the Murchison family home was very joyous and happy. For a whole week after like champagne and caviar flowed, every day of the week. But I was the only one in that household at that time that felt any grief for his assassination."

The Warren Commission should have really been called the “Allen Dulles Commission” because he controlled it and made it the farce that it was. Dulles was probably an elite sponsor (i.e. murderer), as well as certainly Lyndon Johnson. The 3 hardcore cover up artists on the Warren Commission were the 3 Council on Foreign Relations members: Allen Dulles (president CFR 1946-50), John J. McCloy (then chairman of the CFR 1953-1970) and Gerald Ford (CFR member, later president). John J. McCloy was a Rockefeller man, former head of Chase Manhattan bank, and very deep US intelligence since the OSS days. John J. McCloy’s nickname was “Chairman of the American Establishment,” and he mixed at the highest levels of business, intelligence and he was close to the Kennedy-hating Texas business elite. Cover up artist Gerald Ford was secretly reporting to Hoover and the FBI what the Warren Commission was doing. In 1970, Newsweek called Gerald Ford the CIA’s “best friend in Congress.” The CFR especially 40 years ago, was heavily Rockefeller influenced and it top players were deep CIA.

The CIA has been called the military wing of the CFR; and actually that is not too far from the truth. The CFR was in its heyday from 1950-1990.

Here is an absolutely spectacular article why the National Security State murdered John Kennedy: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/marshall10.1.html John Kennedy was despised by and did not control his CIA nor his Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Lyndon Johnson’s reasons to murder were out of his deep desperation and fear of what would become of him after his imminent expulsion from the 1964 Democratic ticket and his fears of going to jail over the exploding Bobby Baker scandal. LIFE magazine, being fed extremely damaging info by Robert Kennedy, was set to run an expose on Lyndon Johnson’s corruption that would blow him out of the water once and for all (Dec. 6^th issue, but due to be printed and mailed on 11/29/63: source James Wagenvoord who worked at LIFE then). Bobby Baker was the protégé of a wildly corrupt LBJ in the Senate; Lyndon Johnson was like both a dad and a big brother to Bobby Baker (who named two of his children after LBJ: Lynda and Lyndon). Both Lyndon Johnson and Bobby Baker were receiving tremendous amounts of under-the-table money while Johnson was running the Senate. The Kennedys and LIFE Magazine were literally days away from politically executing Lyndon Johnson with the rope of the unraveling Bobby Baker scandal. After vaporizing the despised Lyndon Johnson, John Kennedy was going to replace LBJ most likely with Terry Sanford of North Carolina or possibly his good friend George Smathers of Florida as VP on the 1964 Democratic ticket.

The Kennedys and Lyndon Johnson were having a sub rosa fight: Jack and Robert Kennedy brought knives to the battle and Lyndon Johnson brought guns and it was settled on 11/22/63 at 12:30 PM in Dallas.

Lately, I have been studying the role of McGeorge Bundy, the National Security Advisor for JFK and Henry Cabot Lodge, JFK’s insubordinate ambassador to Vietnam who Kennedy was planning to fire on Monday, 11/25/63. It is probable that both McGeorge Bundy and Henry Cabot Lodge were involved some way with the JFK assassination. McGeorge Bundy, astonishingly, was already drafting sharp escalations to JFK’s Vietnam policy NSAM 273 (which JFK would not have approved) on 11/21/63, the night before the 1963 Coup d’Etat! Bundy later ran the Ford Foundation from 1966-1979.

JFK’s Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, who ran the Rockefeller Foundation from 1952-1961, and was also a hawk on Vietnam, is another one who merits close scrutiny in the Coup of 1963. Kennedy had appointed Rusk because it was unlikely that the Senate would confirm JFK’s first choice J. William Fulbright, who later became a prominent opponent of the Vietnam War. After the 1963 Coup d’Etat, Rusk lasted through all the blood and guts of Vietnam and all the way through Jan., 1969, as Johnson’s Secretary of State. Walt Rostow (CFR), another Vietnam hawk, replaced McGeorge Bundy (CFR) as National Security Advisor in 1966. The CFR and the Rockefellers, not John Kennedy, lusted for the Vietnam War.

The midlevel murderers (field operations) of JFK would include CIA guys like Richard Helms, James Angleton, David Morales, William King Harvey, E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis, David Atlee Phillips and perhaps Cord Meyer. Deputy Harry Weatherford is a good candidate to have been on the Records Building as a sniper. Influential mobster Johnny Roselli was especially close friends with the CIA’s William King Harvey, a rabid Kennedy hater. The most likely mafia godfathers involved would be Carlos Marcello and Santos Trafficante, particularly in the Jack Ruby murder of Oswald and perhaps in the JFK Assassination as well and other murders in the post assassination cover up.

We now know Lyndon Johnson was far worse than he is presented in current biographies. Far beyond ballot stuffing, bribery, massive under-the-table kickbacks, and being a consummate and pathological liar, Lyndon Johnson was murdering a lot of people in Texas to cover up his eye popping corruption. A prime example is the murder of US agricultural official Henry Marshall in June, 1961, and who then Vice President Lyndon Johnson arranged to have murdered. In the 1980’s, Billie Sol Estes, a close and corrupt partner of LBJ, began confessing to the murders that he, Lyndon Johnson, Cliff Carter and LBJ’s personal hit man Malcolm Wallace committed. Lyndon Johnson, a manic depressive – and at times a barely functioning psychopath - murdered perhaps 10-20 people to avoid exposure before he got his knife wet with John Kennedy’s blood.

My current thinking on US intelligence agent Lee Harvey Oswald is that he was indeed involved in the JFK assassination, but he was a patsy who shot NO ONE that day, neither John Kennedy nor Officer J.D. Tippit. Both murders were complete frame jobs. Oswald was a fake defector to Russia and his behavior in New Orleans 1963 was all about Oswald’s sheep dipping as he passed out pro-Castro flyers and pretended to be a “pro-Castro Marxist.” Meanwhile Oswald was working in concert in New Orleans with folks like David Ferrie and Guy Bannister whose politics were the equivalent of a 1960’s Strom Thurmond or Jesse Helms. Oswald’s fake public persona as a “pro-Casto Marxist” meant that he was an ideal pick as a patsy and his likely knowledge of and/or participation in the JFK Assassination meant that he had to be murdered quickly. The folks who killed Oswald wanted a “dead Red” not a “talking head.” The JFK assassination was a deception provocation intended to facilitate a US military invasion of Cuba. It was that bad and ugly. A US invasion of Cuba might have provoked a broader war with Russia and from the point of view of some like Air Force General Curtis LeMay that was fine because, astoundingly, he wanted to wage and “win” a nuclear WWIII. Curtis LeMay hated Kennedy so much that a child could have recruited him into a plot to kill Kennedy. LeMay told Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis that he was an appeaser equivalent to Neville Chamberlain for not bombing Cuba.

That was the pool of sharks John Kennedy was swimming in: a desperate and psychopathic serial killer Vice-President Lyndon Johnson who was literally murdering a string of people down in Texas and who was waging a sub rosa war with the Kennedys, an out-of-control CIA hell bent on a coup; an FBI director Hoover who detested JFK and who was close friends and neighbors with LBJ, and a JCS military brass who wanted to invade Cuba, wage the war in Vietnam, and Curtis Lemay who, according to Robert McNamara, wanted to wage full scale nuclear war with Russia, giving them the “Sunday punch” while the USA still had first strike capability. Add to that the white hot mafia hatred that Robert Kennedy was engendering with his prosecutions. This same mafia had been working hand in glove with their friends the CIA to take out Castro in Cuba. Think of these enemies of JFK as fasces: “a bundle of wooden sticks with an axe blade emerging from the center, which is an image that traditionally symbolizes summary power and jurisdiction, and/or strength through unity.”

The elite domestic murderers of JFK did it for many reasons, both personal and ideological. At the core it was Lyndon Johnson, the CIA, and the shadow government of Texas oil barons and the Rockefellers. It was not either/or the Western “Cowboys” or the Eastern “Yankees” who murdered John Kennedy: it was the elites of both.

I always want to learn and I am always willing to change my mind. Two excellent books to read on the JFK assassination are 1) LBJ: Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination (2010) by Phillip Nelson http://www.lbj-themastermind.com/ and 2) JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why it Matters (2008) by James Douglass. Review: http://www.ctka.net/2008/jfk_unspeakable.html Another important review of Douglass: http://bigpeace.com/dladams/2010/12/18/so-alone-jfk-and-the-unspeakable/

Richard Nixon knew the dirty truth about the JFK assassination, but I do not think he was directly involved. In fact, when Nixon was under intense Watergate pressure, his firewall strategy as recorded on the “smoking gun tape” was to ominously say don’t investigate me because it you do “the President believes that this is going to open up the whole Bay of Pigs thing again” – an obvious reference to the JFK assassination. Nixon’s aide Dean Burch said that when George Herbert Walker Bush heard that “He broke out in assholes and shit himself to death.”

Without a doubt, top honors for being biggest source for disinformation on the Coup of 1963 has been the NY Times whose reporting on the JFK assassination has been the equivalent of 1950’s Soviet style propaganda, i.e. completely fraudulent and parroting the 1960’s fantastic whoppers of LBJ, FBI, CIA and the Warren Commission. CBS News, ABC News, the Washington Post and the former LIFE magazine and CIA assets in other major media have been equally bad. LIFE Magazine actually bought the rights to the Zapruder film early on and never showed it once to the American people in video form., which would have revealed the incriminating “back and to the left” head snap of John Kennedy, all but proving a kill shot from the Grassy Knoll (grassy knoll shooting area being an extremely close 33 yards away from JFK). Finally, when American hero Robert Groden showed the Zapruder film on Geraldo on ABC in 1975, millions of Americans knew without a doubt what a sham the Warren Commission was.

A special word about the Council on Relations role in the 1963 Coup d’Etat and cover up: no other organization has been more responsible for the murder and cover up of John Kennedy than the CFR. Elite CFR members such as Allen Dulles, Nelson Rockefeller and George Herbert Walker Bush were probably sponsors of the JFK assassination. Certainly leadership CFR members such as Allen Dulles, John J. McCloy, and Gerald Ford played the most critical roles in the Warren Commission farce. Add in cover up roles played by Nelson Rockefeller (CFR), Henry Kissinger (CFR), Richard Helms (CFR), William Colby CIA/CFR, McGeorge Bundy (CFR), Nicholas Katzenbach (CFR), Jack Valenti (CFR), Bill Moyers (CFR), William Coleman (CFR) James Reston NY Times (CFR), Anthony Lewis NY Times (CFR), Walter Cronkite CBS (CFR), Dan Rather CBS (CFR), Peter Jennings ABC (CFR), Daniel Schorr (CFR), Arthur Ochs Sulzberger NY Times (CFR), Kenneth Gilmore Readers’ Digest (CFR), Stephen Rosenfeld Washington Post (CFR), Bobbie Ray Inman (CFR), … the list is almost endless. Note two things: 1) they are the key establishment players of BOTH major political parties spanning decades 2) their power and influence is directly proportional to the fantastic whoppers they tell about in the 1963 Coup d’Etat. For the older CFR members it is a case of PARTICIPATION and COVER UP in the JFK assassination. For the younger ones such as George Will (CFR), Charles Krauthammer (CFR), Bill Kristol (CFR), David Gergen (CFR), John Segenthaler (CFR), Frank Sesno (CFR), Michael Beschloss (CFR) it is a case of WILLFUL IGNORANCE as they still push the Big Lie. Note: Chris Matthews of Hardball, another willfully ignorant man, is close friends with Richard Haass, current president of CFR. I have never seen the highly acclaimed political guru Michael Barone, a Bilderberger attendee, ever say anything credible on the JFK assassination.

Question: do we really expect the CFR to admit that some of its elite members slaughtered John Kennedy and many more played integral roles in the cover up? No, but it is important to highlight that the Council on Foreign Relations has stunk up the place with tremendous amounts of radioactive horse manure relating to the 1963 Coup d’Etat.

The 1963 Coup d’Etat was very similar to the 1992 election between George Herbert Walker Bush, Ross Perot and Bill Clinton. In 1963, there was a Texas Vice President, a desperate and dangerous Lyndon Johnson - supported by the CFR, the intelligence agencies, military contractors and the oil industry - who feared exposure of his criminality and was on the verge of political and personal annihilation. So Lyndon Johnson used the CIA to murder his political rival John Kennedy.

In the 1992, there was a Texas President, a desperate and dangerous George Herbert Walker Bush, supported by the CFR, the intelligence agencies, military contractors and the oil industry - who feared exposure of his criminality and was on the verge of political and personal annihilation. Ross Perot was well aware of the gargantuan Bush/Clinton/CIA drug smuggling of the 1980’s. So George Herbert Walker Bush used CIA assassins to threaten to murder Ross Perot. GHW Bush feared what Perot, a self-funded (and therefore uncontrollable) billionaire might do in office. Bush, like LBJ 29 years before, faced both political and personal annihilation if an untainted Ross Perot were elected.

Ross Perot was leading in a Time/CNN poll in June, 1992, with 37% to 24% Clinton, 24% Bush. On July 16, 1992, Ross Perot, a billionaire who could self-fund and was leading in the polls significantly, QUIT the presidential race because he feared that a desperate George Herbert Walker Bush might assassinate him. Google “Chip Tatum Pegasus" and read about the elite CIA assassin who quit rather than do what George Herbert Walker Bush had ordered him to do:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/MENA/TATUM/tatum.html

An incensed Perot later got back in the race only to ensure the election of Bill Clinton.

I think that George Herbert Walker Bush became a made man with the JFK assassination in 1963. One of the first things the Bill Clinton CFR did after he got elected in 1992 was to ask Webb Hubbell at Justice to find out who really killed John Kennedy.

The Discovery Channel has put out some incredibly bogus, poorly done disinfo presentations such as Inside the Target Car. Any MSM site that features Vincent Bugliosi, Gerald Posner, especially Hugh Aynesworth, Edward Jay Epstein, Gus Russo, Dale Meyers, Max Holland, Dave Perry or Gary Mack prominently and positively is giving you counterfeit money. Edward Epstein and Gerald Posner in particular are thought by many credible JFK researchers to be CIA propagandists. If you google “JFK assassination” the first 2 links that come up are lone nutter controlled disinfo sites: 1) Wikipedia 2) John McAdam’s site. John McAdams is a very lowly regarded man who basically controls JFK related content on Wikipedia as well as his own site. Both Wikipedia and the NY Times are both tremendously dishonest sources for information relating to the 1963 Coup d’Etat. Finally, another major source of disinformation on the Coup of 1963 is the Sixth Floor Museum in Dallas, which blithely recycles the shredded vapors of the Warren Commission, as if it had an ounce of truth in it. Gary Mack, the curator of the Sixth Floor Museum, simply does not have credibility on the JFK assassination.

In the near future there are going to be efforts by both Tom Hanks (HBO series) and Leonardo DiCaprio (a movie) to take on the JFK assassination. Sadly, these are both going to be disinformation efforts; the ONLY legitimate take on the JFK assassination is that it was a full blown domestic coup d’etat. Tom Hanks is a clueless lone nutter.

The best discussion boards on the internet for good info are 1) Education Forum 2) Deep Politics Forum 3) JFKmurdersolved.com and 4) Mary Ferrell Foundation – www.maryferrell.org 5) JFK Lancer. On Facebook, the premier spot is JFK-The Grassy Knoll Witnesses (run by Rusty Yardum) http://www.facebook.com/pages/JFK-The-Grassy-Knoll-Witnesses/115305938487641 . Black Op radio’s web site www.blackopradio.com (Len Osanic) is an excellent place to listen to high quality interviews with folks such as JFK expert Jim DiEugenio. Deep Politics Quarterly (Walt Brown) http://www.manuscriptservice.com/DPQ/ and www.ctka.net (Jim DiEugenio) are 2 other quality spots on the internet.

As for videos, I highly recommend going to You Tube and watching the extremely important The Men Who Killed Kennedy - (episodes 7, 8, and 9). Much of these episodes focus on the role of Lyndon Johnson in the 1963 Coup d’Etat and they were BANNED from the History Channel because they were so accurate. LBJ aide Jack Valenti (CFR) organized a suppression campaign on the videos along with Lady Bird Johnson, Warren Commission con man Gerald Ford (CFR), Jimmy Carter (CFR) and Bill Moyers (CFR). Also, watch Jesse Ventura’s 2010 Conspiracy Theory show on the JFK assassination (on You Tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHUKPXR5TbQ ). In addition, I recommend JFK the movie by Oliver Stone, director’s cut. Oliver Stone, despite immense criticism in the MSM by CIA assets, pretty much nailed the JFK assassination. It was a full blown Coup d’Etat by Lyndon Johnson, the CIA and key elements of the U.S. military.

Robert Morrow is a political researcher with over 200+ books on the 1963 Coup d’Etat, aka JFK assassination. His email is Morrow321@aol.com and he accepts phone calls at 512-306-1510.

1) http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/morrow-r1.1.1.html

2) http://www.infowars.com/the-lbj-cia-assassination-of-jfk/

3) http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2010/12/my-files-on-lbj-and-cia-assassination.html

4) http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2011/01/02/the-lbj-cia-assassination-of-jfk

5) http://lyndonjohnsonmurderedjfk.blogspot.com/2010/12/lbj-cia-assassination-of-jfk-and-1963.html

--- end ---

John Lennon's Assassination by Mae Brussell (1981)

2011-12-11T09:14:00.001-06:00

INTERVIEW WITH MAE BRUSSELL ON THE ASSASSINATION OF JOHN ONO LENNON

A short while ago we had the pleasure of talking to noted assassination/conspiracy researcher Mae Brussell at her home in Carmel, California. Mae was kind enough to share some of her thoughts on the murder of John Lennon last December 8, 1980 in New York City. She is just starting her 11th year of broadcasting on radio KLRB, Carmel, CA.
Tom Davis

***************************************
Tom: What would be the motive to kill John Lennon on December 8, 1980? Lennon had been in seclusion for many years and had not yet released his new album.
Mae: Both the date of Lennon's murder, and the careful selection of this particular victim are very important. Six weeks after Lennon's death, Ronald Reagan would become President. Reagan and his soon-to-be appointed cabinet were prepared to build up the Pentagon war machine and increase the potential for war against the USSR. The first strike would fall on small countries like El Salvador and Guatemala. Lennon, alone, was the only man (even without his fellow Beatles) who had the ability to draw out one million anti-war protestors in any given city within 24 hours, if he opposed those war policies.
John Lennon was a spiritual force. He was a giant, like Gandhi, a man who wrote about peace and brotherly love. He taught an entire generation to think for themselves and to challenge authority. Lennon and the Beatles' songs shout out the inequalities life and the messages of change. Change is a threat to the longtime status quo that Reagan's team exemplified.
On my weekly radio broadcast of December 7, 1980, I stated that "the old assassination teams are coming back into power." The very people responsible for covering up the murders of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert Kennedy, Reverend Martin Luther King, for Watergate and Koreagate, and the kidnapping and murder of Howard Hughes, and for hundreds of other deaths, had only six weeks before they would again be removing or silencing those voices of opposition to their policies.
Lennon was coming out once more. His album was cut. He was preparing to be part of the world, a world which was a worse place since the time he had withdrawn with his family. It was a sure bet Lennon would react and become a social activist again. That was the threat. Lennon realized that there was danger coming back into public view. He took that dangerous chance, and we all lost!
Tom: The common assumption is that Mark David Chapman, arrested the moment he killed John Lennon, was acting out his personal love-hate relationship with Lennon. Why do you have to look for a larger conspiracy than the conflicts in Chapman's own head?
Mae: Single crimes of passion are easy to explain and easy to solve. When someone is gunned down who is controversial, has political enemies, is hated by wealthy and well-organized religious movements, and is an open opponent of government policies at home and abroad, that kind of murder requires much more inquiry into the background of the assassin. The conclusions about the murder motive may turn out to be simple. Yet, in every political assassination since 1963, there were always more unanswered questions that led to a broader supposition of intention to kill by a group of people rather than one single individual.
Tom: What is the first clue you look for if you are suspicious of a larger conspiracy to assassinate, whether it is John Lennon, President John F. Kennedy, or the recent attempts on President Reagan and Pope John Paul II?
Mae: There are necessary connecting links in every assassination conspiracy. If any link of that chain falls apart and becomes exposed, the parts of the larger plot are more visible. When every element of that chain holds together and is present in the evidence and testimony regarding any particular murder, there has to be a larger conspiracy. (See accompanying diagram)
The most important link in that chain is the selected decoy or patsy. Whoever is arrested at the scene of the crime, to the exclusion of other suspicious persons, becomes the "assassin." This single person must serve a purpose, namely, to divert all attention away from those people who have armed him and located him at the scene of the crime.
Letters and diaries are always present and easily located to support the predetermined cover story. They provide a "motive", and are the glue that cements (we are told) the "loner" to his single purpose.
In preparation for his "act", the decoy or patsy is moved across countries or overseas, traveling and staying at safe houses. He has no friends, no jobs, no means of support while at the same time staying at fancy hotels, spending lots of money, getting phone messages, and meeting lots of people. Very few people have the money to spend years in transit like these patsies, whose chances of being in selected locations at the precise moment their victim is murdered are minute and impossible without assistance.
Tom: Who was Mark David Chapman? What was there in his background that made you suspicious that he had been selected for a "decoy" or "patsy" by other persons who wanted Lennon dead?
Mae: Chapman came from a conservative military family who had moved from Fort Worth, Texas to Florida. He had become a "Jesus Freak" at the time Lennon and the Beatles were getting death threats during the anti-war period. Joining this movement while supposedly loving and admiring Lennon was a gross contradiction, for the religious fundamentalists were furious that Lennon considered himself better known and loved than Jesus.
DeKalb County, Georgia, just to the east of Atlanta, figures prominently in Chapman's life as it had some years earlier in that of Martin Luther King. In 1977 in a court affidavit, Robert Byron Watson, former employee of Magellon's Art Gallery, Atlanta, named several citizens as having planned and bragged about the "future murder of Reverend Martin Luther King." King's death came just one week after the plans were discussed. These same people also talked about murdering Senator Robert Kennedy.
Chapman attended DeKalb Junior College in the area where these kinds of plans were laid and such political anger was being vented. From DeKalb County, Chapman was sent to Beirut, Lebanon. He was handed the funds both ways. Beirut was the center for George Habash and CIA assassination teams also identified in the Watson testimony before the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1977-78.
On March 31, 1981, United Press International exposed the connection of "military training in a guerrilla camp" in Beirut, Lebanon to "worldwide Nazi ties."
After six months in Lebanon, Chapman went to Fort Chaffee, Arkansas to work with Vietnam refugees recently arrived from Southeast Asia. Members of the CIA were with him at this military base.
William Colby's Vietnam Phoenix program, staffed with agents who intensely hated the anti-war, social activists like John Lennon, had both the intent and the means to move persons like Chapman to their training camps and then to specific places planned as sites for future assassinations. Colby came back to the U.S. to become Director of the C.I.A. at a time (1973) when "Operation Chaos" was in full swing against the hippies, rock musicians, and anti-war protestors. Many of them were killed or otherwise neutralized.
From Fort Chaffee, Arkansas, Chapman moved to Lookout Mountain, Tennessee to attend Presbyterian College.
Martin Luther King, a victim of plans made in DeKalb County, Georgia, was murdered in Memphis, Tennessee. Senator Howard Baker from Tennessee and CIA Director William Colby were making deals to cover up Watergate crimes in 1974-75, year before Chapman moved to Tennessee.
According to news reports, Chapman "fled" Tennessee to Hawaii in 1976. His earliest arrest records indicated he had committed crimes in Florida, but the authorities later blamed these crimes on another person, excusing the mix-up as a "computer mistake." Many patsies and decoys have earlier arrest records that are used to keep them silent and actively cooperative for fear of going to jail. Was there any connection between the Florida identification and the reason for Chapman's flight to Hawaii?
Hawaii has been the scene of many clandestine operations. Many CIA Vietnamese and members of the Special Forces, now safely removed from Vietnam, were assembled in Hawaii. The Nugan Hand Bank, an Australian conduit for CIA "black money", actually assassination funds, kept a branch in Hawaii. Herbert Mullen, convicted of mass murders in California, appeared perfectly normal until he was sent to a military hospital in Hawaii. It was in Maui that he went through his "religious thinking" and evolved as a killer. Ed Sanders, author of The Family, a book about the Manson Family, obtained documents regarding a mysterious trip Mullen took to Hawaii before he later became a programmed killer.
The years from 1976 to 1978 in Chapman's biography are still vague and murky: two years of limited employment and "mental treatment." Allegedly, he was in the hospital for a mental breakdown. On the other hand, if there were any evidence of mental instability, would not his permit application to buy the murder weapon have been denied?
There were many years, months, days when Chapman could have been mentally programmed to become like the "Manchurian Candidate," specifically to murder John Lennon, if and when he re-entered public life. Lennon was not threat until the U.S. was getting close to another war.
Subsequently, Chapman took a long "vacation", including a trip around the world. During this voyage he made a trip to Switzerland to meet a pal from DeKalb County, Georgia, the same man who earlier had arranged the original trip to Lebanon. The journey culminated in London with a rare visit to a live Lennon concert.
Chapman's wife, who worked for a travel agency, "arranged his itinerary". The source of the money for his fare, hotels, food, concerts, has never been identified, although Pacific Holding Ltd., a "tourism" company formed by the CIA and Special Forces, may be implicated. Both groups had funds to hire assassination teams.
When Chapman left his job in Hawaii, October 23, 1980, he flew to Atlanta, GA. From Georgia, he went to New York City with the intention of killing John Lennon, but was apparently able to resist the "master inside himself", a conflict he describes, and returned to Hawaii. Before long, however, Hawaii was again behind him, and Chapman arrived in New York on December 5, 1980 with the specific plan to kill John Lennon, which he did three days later.
Tom: What you are talking about is only circumstantial. There is no proof that the CIA or any government agency manipulated Chapman for their purposes. When does the proof of a conspiracy ever become apparent?
Mae: The burden of proof of conspiracy is put upon the private investigator. The common denominator in all these cases are those links in the conspiracy chain (see diagram) which show the relevant questions to be asked: Were there other persons along with Chapman shooting at Lennon to make sure he died? Who fled the scene in a hurry, never sought again by law enforcement agencies? Why did the New York police adamantly refuse to accept pictures of Chapman taken autographing an album earlier in the evening of the murder? Why were they donated to a newspaper after the police refused to accept them? When Chapman's wife was called by the New York Police, why did they instruct her, "Don't release any picture of him."? How could Miami Police issue an erroneous description of a criminal record having the same last name, date of birth, race, and approximate height as the slaying suspect? Can we ever see the picture of the Florida suspect? If Chapman was treated for mental illness in Hawaii, how did he procure the weapon in Hawaii? How did Chapman transport the gun from the Island to the Mainland? (This question was dismissed by the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents, who said, "No investigation was in progress.")
Money was never a problem for this wanderer. He and his wife lived in a $400 a month apartment and were able to support his hobby of collecting expensive works of art. Owning original Norman Rockwell lithographs worth $7,500, and traveling around the world aren't impossible, if there is some kind of occupation that provides the money for these luxuries.
If Chapman wrote "John Lennon" on his job work sheet on October 23, 1980, it would seem impossible for someone not to notice this message until the day after Lennon was murdered. Employment log sheets are usually added up regularly to determine the hours worked and amount of pay checks. It is more probable that Chapman wrote this name at that time so that his cover story, his defense after the murder, would be his mental identification with John Lennon.
Chapman's intention to find Lennon, as just another adoring Beatle fan, must be separated from the question of who transported him from Hawaii to Georgia to New York, back to Hawaii, and back again to New York, with lots of cash, and with the sole purpose of killing Lennon.
Jimmy Breslin, New York columnist, was impressed that Mark David Chapman could be such a "good shot" with "no military background at all." But Chapman had been trained to shoot. He had learned to become a security guard in Georgia before his trips to Lebanon and to the many countries where he could have been instructed in killing. What about Ft. Chaffee? Why not shooting practice in Tennessee? What about military bases in Hawaii? What gives Breslin and the New York Daily News the right to make such statements without an inkling of Chapman's background?
Like all the other "loner" drifters, Chapman stayed at expensive hotels. His last evening before killing Lennon was spent at the Sheraton Centre Hotel in New York. He was carrying more than $2,000 in cash along with his credit cards. Where did he get these cards, and on what basis was the money earned and saved to establish credit to qualify for these cards?
Tom: You apparently believe there was a government conspiracy to assassinate and silence John Lennon which was conducted by the same people who murdered other political figures and musicians in the past eighteen years?
Mae: Absolutely! The federal government has maintained active programs to eliminate rock musicians and disrupt rock concerts. Senator Frank Church's Committee hearings in 1975 and the FBI Cointel-Programs clearly document the intent to break up any gatherings of the "new left". Nothing brought anti-war demonstrators together with political messages more effectively than music festivals.
There is hard evidence the CIA assigned agents to "investigate the music industry." After the murders of Tim Buckley, Jim Croce, and Mama Cass Elliot, more information surfaced about earlier mysterious deaths of Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison, and Janis Joplin. Listed below, but not updated this past year, are some of the rock musicians who have died since the Huston Plan and the FBI Cointel-Program were activated. If these people had been taking any kinds of drugs, there is the distinct possibility that specific poisons were added to their drugs, enough to be fatal, to make it appear that they had died from a simple "overdose".

John Lennon Paul Kossoff John Bonham
Elvis Presley Jim Reeves Steve Parson
Buddy Holly Berry Oakley Bob Marley
Otis Redding Tim Buckley Sal Mineo
Brian Jones Jim Croce Harry Chapin
Jimi Hendrix Richard Earina Brian Epstein, Beatles manager
Janis Joplin Lenny Bruce
Jim Morrison Larry Williams Michael Jeffery, Jimi Hendrix manager
Duane Allman Bon Scott, AC/DC
Mama Cass Elliot Richie Valens Rod McKernan, "Pig Pen" of the Grateful Dead
Gram Parsons J. P. Richardson
Phil Oakes Ronnie Van Zandt
Marc Bolan Steve Gains Donald Rex Jackson, Grateful Dead mgr.
Keith Moon Sid Viscious

The murder of John Lennon is the tragic finale to an entire era, the reminder that once an artist becomes as popular and as political as he was, his enemies will be waiting to make sure his messages never appear again to awaken the slumbering youth.

Home

The Patty Hurst Kidnapping by Mae Brussell (1974)

2011-12-11T07:47:00.002-06:00

From the Berkeley Barb, April 19 - 25, 1974 (Number 18)

BOTH SIDES NOW

INSIDE THE HEARSTKIDNAPPING

DONALD DeFREEZE WAS FIRST BLACK PATSY
IN SECRET GOVT. PLAN TO TAKE OVER U.S.

by Mae Brussell and Stephanie Caruana
Berkeley Barb/APS
Mae Brussell is a researcher who has spent ten years studying political assassinations and conspiracies in the United States. On July 11, 1972, she wrote the first and so far the only article to give a reasonable explanation for the break-in and arrest at the Watergate -- three weeks after the event. The article, "Why Was Martha Mitchell Kidnapped?" as well as a long companion piece, "The Senate Select Committee is Part of the Cover-Up," were published in The Realist. A story about Mae Brussell's first article, which connected Watergate with the Kennedy assassinations, appeared in BSN no. 16, p. 4, under the title, "Does Secret Government Control America?"
For three years, Brussell's weekly hour-long radio news analysis show, Dialogue Conspiracy, has been broadcast over Station KLRB-FM, in Carmel, California. Tapes of Dialogue Conspiracy are available to other radio stations through KLRB-FM. Brussell is currently working on a complete account of the Patricia Hearst kidnapping conspiracy for The Realist, and a book called Murderville, U.S.A. She also teaches the first accredited university course entitled Conspiracies and Assassinations, at Monterey Peninsula College.
Stephanie Caruana is a writer whose work has appeared in Playgirl and the Los Angeles Times, and the author of a play, The Rip-Off.
The following interview was completed in April.
SC: Can you please explain what is going on? Who or what is the S.L.A., and why did they kidnap Patricia Hearst?
MB: The script from the very beginning was to have the nice rich white princess kidnapped by the mean black prison "escapees;" to drag out the scenario until the whole nation was involved with Patty's fate; and then to sacrifice her. Donald DeFreeze and Thero Wheeler would be the patsies. DeFreeze would be the main patsy: the first black Lee Harvey Oswald. He would wind up dead, or in jail, silenced, like Sirhan Sirhan, Jack Ruby, Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Arthur Bremmer, and many other patsies. The intelligence agencies behind the plot didn't plan that Patty Hearst, Donald DeFreeze, and Thero Wheeler would survive and tell their story. The whole plot for the paramilitary take-over of the United States might come out in the open if the truth is revealed about this kidnapping.
On the other hand, if the plan to assassinate Patty Hearst is carried out, the military intelligence agencies will be stuck with something around their necks that could be just as difficult to cover up as the truth about the Kennedy assassination. Evidence of a high-level conspiracy will keep cropping up, again and again, and many more people will be murdered. Since the Watergate story began to emerge, some people have become more sophisticated, and more suspicious. They know they have been lied to by people on the highest level of our government.
The Hearst kidnapping is a domestic conspiracy. It has to be understood in its historical context.
The past ten years have seen the murder of a President, a Senator, Congressmen, civil rights leaders, and hundreds of other victims of what I believe are related conspiracies.
The next ten years will be bloody and fearful for all minorities in the United States. It appears that there will be a concerted effort on the part of the Defense Intelligence Agency to continue the policies of the Nazis they brought into this country following World War II. (See "Does Secret Government Control America" in BSN No. 16, p. 4.) Genocide will be made possible by the same techniques used in Germany.
Two large airports will be utilized to move large masses of people. In addition to the Dallas-Ft. Worth airport, a new airport is planned in San Diego, next to the Mexican border. These airports have been designed with extra-thick runways, to accommodate giant 747 planes. The planes themselves, which have proved "impractical for civilian use," have just been purchased by the military, and are being remodeled for mass transport. Their engines are turned over every day, at a cost of thousands of dollars, so that they can be pressed into service at a day's notice.
Two large new prisons, costing over $186 million, are proposed for California. One is located in San Diego, next to the "new airport." The proposed prisons in Vacaville and San Diego will specialize in "mental problems," turning inmates into zombies.
Twelve and a half million acres of California desert land, stretching from the Mexican border near San Diego to the Sierra Nevada, have been secretly and quickly closed off to all vehicles. "Fear of dune buggies" was the cover story for his act. There should be regular examination of this territory for new fences and structures of any kind.
A new $105 million hospital, the most expensive in the world, is being planned for Travis Air Force Base in California. It is located on 82 private acres, inaccessible to most persons. This will be a computerized hospital, designed to include a revolutionary "one-room treatment center." Col. Oliver C. Hood admitted that this "one-stop treatment, laboratory, drug dispensing, examining room may be controversial and not universally accepted at this time."
The point should be very clear. Given enough violence, murders, and kidnappings in the U.S.A., the new hospitals, prisons, and airports will be used for mass genocide. There is nothing going on is our economy to assure housing, jobs, or education for minorities. Congress is purposely impounding funds, cutting off school bussing, and denying legal aid for the poor. President Nixon is moving to reduce welfare funds drastically, at a time when job opportunities for minorities are scarce. All steps towards equal opportunity and racial progress are being halted. These actions are said to be the results of the "energy crisis."
Preceding the Hearst kidnapping in February, 1974, there was a series of carefully staged, "senseless, motiveless" killings. They were blamed upon "cults." Persons who survived the murderous attacks described their assailants as "zombies." "Operation Zebra" -- black versus white.
A series of so-called "Fillmore fires" took place before the killings. They were named after Fillmore Street in San Francisco - a street in the black part of town. CIA arsonists have been known to do such things as burn their own churches, and set fire to many buildings in order to blame "hippies." The association of minorities with murder and arson was achieved.
What we are now experiencing is the importation of the dreaded "Operation Phoenix" program into the United States. William E. Colby, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, will be conducting paramilitary operations in order to escalate the necessity for martial law. Through various created and manipulated acts of violence, the only "solution" to "chaos, anarchy, and senseless violent acts" will be a police state. Colby's C.I.A. specialty, the "Phoenix Operation" in Southeast Asia, was known for its torture, political assassinations, mass murders (20,000 to 40,000 civilians), tiger cages, rigged elections, and slanted intelligence.
The fact that this person was approved for appointment as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency by a Senate vote of 83-13 indicates that the Senate both agrees with, and rewards, an agent of theirs for these acts against mankind.
It is no coincidence that the same Senate turned down a vote, after 25 years of stalling and debating, on an agreement that would outlaw genocide as late as March, 1974.
A government that funds, promotes, recognizes, and allows war criminals to direct their domestic affairs reveals a total disrespect for our lives. This monster and its vicious machinery will now turn upon us at home.
The Phoenix program was an indiscriminate murder program in Asia, utilizing terror and the killing of innocent people. The Hearst kidnapping is part of the Phoenix program inside the United States.
SC: Is the Hearst kidnapping related to other political assassinations and conspiracies?
MB: Yes. It is the most important domestic military action since the murder of President John Kennedy.
SC: How are they related?
MB: The killing of John Kennedy marked the overthrow of a government elected by the majority. It was also the signal for a domestic "war" against minorities, students, and prisoners, and for the escalation of war in Southeast Asia. The Hearst kidnapping is the beginning of the reign of terror on our streets. It is part of a deliberate campaign of terror. It will be used to justify larger private police forces, more repression, and larger and more expensive prisons. There will be increased public distrust of blacks, Maoists, prisoners, lesbians, gays, hippies, radicals, communes, and genuine protesters who will be described as terrorist guerrillas. The most important scare tactic will be to link this kidnapping to worldwide guerrilla movements.
SC: What about the spate of kidnappings that have suddenly occurred since the Hearst kidnapping? are they related to this one?
MB: The kidnapping of Reg Murphy, editor of the Atlanta Constitution, was supposed to be synchronized with the Hearst kidnapping. There is other evidence that the two events were planned by the same officials. John Calzadilla, eight years old, was "kidnapped" in New York by people who were anti-Castro Cubans, some from Miami. Persons who witnessed his "captivity" claimed that he was happy, enjoying himself, and unguarded. He appeared to know his "captors," and did not seem to be under any stress before he was returned home.
The halting of Princess Anne's car, by a well-groomed, "unemployed" man with over $700 and a phony Marxist-Leninist ransom note in his pocket, was obviously an intelligence scare tactic. There is no possible way he could have taken her anywhere, since they were surrounded and closed off by traffic.
John Patterson, the American diplomat who was allegedly kidnapped in Mexico, was seen at a service station less then ten minutes after he drove away from the Consulate and "vanished." His car was chained to a camper truck, being towed away. Witnesses said he appeared "calm and not guarded," and Mexican authorities doubted the kidnap report. Eunice Kronholm, the banker's wife from Minneapolis, came home laughing after her instant departure from the shopping center. Her husband paid $200,000 "ransom" to a group of three men who were not even charged with kidnapping.
There has been a series of faked "mini-kidnappings," similar to the rash of military-trained airplane hijackings a few years ago, which led to the stationing of armed police guards and X-ray machines at every airport.
Just because the media terms an event a "kidnapping," does not necessarily make it a kidnapping at all.
SC: Are you saying that these are acts committed by provocateurs, to create a climate of fear?
MB: Of course. All the recent kidnappings were planned, funded and carried out by the same intelligence agencies. It would be easy to investigate the matter. Once the people are terrorized, you can force a police state on them. The San Francisco Chronicle recently ran an article with the headline, "A Constant Watch on Radicals Urged." The article talks about a report made to a California Senate Subcommittee, based on the recommendations of a 63-page manual. Where did this manual come from? They don't even know who or what the S.L.A. is yet, but the manual is there, and the report is ready within five weeks of the Hearst kidnapping. They recommend increased security for homes and offices, a constant watch on "radicals" such as blacks, chicanos, and labor organizations, and a neighborhood spy on every block. This is Nazi Germany.
SC: Attorney General William Saxbe was suggesting that the Hearst kidnapping in Berkeley could be part of a world-wide conspiracy. He cited various manuals and textbooks circulating among terrorist and revolutionary groups examined by the FBI.
MB: The structure for my book, "Murderville, U.S.A.," is taken from a U.S. Armed forces manual, printed in South Carolina, called "Unconventional Warfare Operating Procedures." A soldier at Fort Ord showed me how the U.S. military were being trained in counter-intelligence and domestic warfare. The parallels between our D.I.A. and C.I.A operations were proof that military agents and provocateurs could cause economic chaos, social unrest, and domestic fear in the United States, using the identical methods that we have used overseas. There is a closer relationship between our National Security Council and its intelligence operations and Nazi military intelligence than there is between so-called "terrorist books" and the international kidnappings taking place.
SC: Three weeks before the Hearst kidnapping, Joseph Remiro and Russell Little were arrested and later charged with the murder of Oakland's Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Marcus Foster. The S.L.A. claimed the "credit" for this murder, and later for the Hearst kidnapping. What is the relationship between these events?
MB: The purpose of the Foster murder was to establish the existence of the S.L.A. In October, 1973, the American Nazi Party was passing out leaflets in the San Leandro shopping center, outside Oakland, that stated, "There might be shotgun blasts into the guts of Mix Master principals and superintendents." Dr. Foster was black, and his co-worker and close friend, Mr. Blackburn, is white. A well-respected black educator was eliminated in Oakland, and the murder would be associated with black radicals to spread terror among the community.
Two different kinds of bullets were used for the shootings, which allowed the white educator to live. The black man never had a chance; the bullets that murdered him were tipped with cyanide.
Another fictitious police front, the "August Seventh Guerrilla Movement," claimed credit for the death of two Oakland policemen who went down in a helicopter in December, 1973. The National Transportation Safety Board, Hughes Aircraft, and local authorities said it would have been impossible for radicals to have caused these deaths. The purpose of these feats of violence in California, bragged about by people who are unknown even to the F.B.I. and the local police, is to spread the illusion that multiple terrorists are hiding among us, trying to create chaos and disrupt our daily lives.
The result was that when Patricia Hearst was kidnapped, it appeared that America's first political kidnapping was an act performed by already-existing militant forces.

Alioto's Zebras
SC: There seems to have been a number of unexplained murders and senseless acts of violence in the San Francisco area recently. Do you think they are related to the Hearst kidnapping?
MB: Mayor Joseph Alioto hinted in a news conference on April 5 that he "suspects a possible relationship between the Patricia Hearst kidnappings and the city's recent wave of random slayings." He went on to announce: "We'll have something to say about that matter next week, depending on the resolution of the Hearst case." While Patricia Hearst, Donald DeFreeze and Thero Wheeler are alive, there is no way to link the S.L.A. to the Bay Area murders, because they were not involved in any of them. If the political patsies are killed, the law enforcement agents will associate a huge secret "army" and "cult" of blacks to all the murders.
Attorney General Evelle Younger, closely connected to the L.A.P.D. (Los Angeles Police Department) and the national and prison conspiracies that have existed for the past few years, has been strangely silent about the Hearst case. He announced that he would have "plenty to say" when it is all over. In order to whip up a synchronized smear of radicals, Younger and Alioto, along with Attorney General Saxbe in Washington, will link up all C.I.A. intelligence operations involving terrorists, and blame them on an international radical conspiracy.
While the Warren Report was being written, there was a problem about denying Jack Ruby's involvement in a conspiracy, and whether or not they could pass him off as a "lone killer." Commission member Burt Griffin wrote to Howard Willens on this matter, on August 4, 1964. He said, "The preface and conclusion state that the Commission has found no evidence that anyone assisted Jack Ruby in the shooting of Oswald. We have not conducted an investigation which would effectively exhaust the possibility that someone did assist Ruby even if the assistance was unwitting. Inasmuch as Ruby is still alive and will continue to dicker concerning his fate, (our emphasis) I think it is a mistake for the Commission to make any statement which would indicate that its investigation in that regard has been exhausted."
The Mayor, the Attorney General, the F.B.I. and the police departments must keep mum and delay their propaganda until the killings are over. Nothing can be smeared more easily than a dead body.

Remiro & Little
SC: The way Remiro and Little were captured seemed strange to me. They were driven around and around in a van at two o'clock in the morning, until a policeman came along and stopped them. They told him they were looking for the home of Mr. and Mrs. DeVoto.
MB: They had S.L.A. literature inside the van. Russell Little drove away in the van, and was captured by the police. Little had identification papers indicating that his name was Robert James Scalise. That was the name of a child who died of leukemia in Oakland in 1953. Joseph Remiro ran off, and made it to his house, a few blocks away. Remiro was also using an alias at the time. The house had been rented by Remiro himself, under still another alias: George DeVoto. According to one newspaper account, Remiro conferred with several other people in the house for several hours about what to do. One of the people in the house may have been Donald DeFreeze. The police were in the area, looking for Remiro, but they did not come to the house.
The group inside the "safe house" agreed to "sacrifice Remiro." He left the house to meet the police in the area. At the time, he wore a gun around his waist, which was alleged to be the same gun that was used to kill Dr. Foster. The question is, since Remiro knew he ran a strong chance of being captured if he went outside the house, why would he wear the murder weapon? There was a similar incident in the Watergate case. When the first piece of scotch tape was taken off the door at the Watergate Hotel by security guard Frank Wills, a member of the robbery-bugging team put another piece of tape on the same door. This act led to their arrest.
SC: Do you think they were out to get busted?
MB: It might be. Having two self-confessed "soldiers" in jail gave the S.L.A. more reality. They also linked the fictitious S.L.A. to the prisons, bringing attention to "problems" which would be used to bring down more repressions upon innocent prisoners later.
After Remiro and Little were arrested, they were put directly into San Quentin, a prison, without being tried or convicted. This is unheard-of. Nobody goes into a prison that way. Normally, accused prisoners are held in a jail.
One of the big motives behind the Hearst conspiracy was to involve radical prisoners, and to suggest that those men, although behind bars, were having some influence on the violence in the streets. The script originally read that supposedly vicious black prisoners would avenge Foster's death by killing Remiro and Little while they were housed on death row. But prisoners sometimes show more compassion toward their comrades, black and white, than prison guards and intelligence agencies want to believe. They all got along, and helped each other.
The government underestimates the intelligence of prisoners, hippies, and minority group members. When Remiro and Little found themselves in San Quentin, they realized what was going on. They were chained up at night; they were dragged past the gas chamber, on a special "tour," and were carried off by three carloads of FBI men for two hours to a "secret meeting place," without their lawyers present. Instead of being killed, Remiro and Little began to get an education. They ended up in the cells of some very educated and intelligent men, up on Death Row, who understood what was happening and who could sit and rap with them.
A very aware prisoner who has been kept in one of the isolation cells at San Quentin has said: "My keepers put two people back here with me: The Foster mess, you dig? Anyway, they are some beautiful people, and there was no reason at all for the establishment to take them out of the Adjustment Center and put them up here, in the quiet cells, of all places. The officials don't like it, really, because all of us get along so good with each other. But you know how that goes."
When Remiro and Little realized they had become patsies, and that they had been used, they tried to get a message across to DeFreeze: "Release Patty Hearst." Remiro and Little may have realized that the whole S.L.A. idea -- the murder and the kidnapping -- had been staged under the direction of intelligence agents. Lee Harvey Oswald recognized he was being framed 24 hours after his arrest. He lived only long enough to say, "I am a patsy," and "I didn't kill anybody." Remiro and Little wanted to prevent the climax of the plot from taking place: the murder of Patty Hearst. They got the message through, in spite of official obstacles.

CIA invents SLA
SC: Are you saying there is no such thing as the S.L.A.?
MB: The S.L.A. "army" was a fabrication of the C.I.A. to make a small group of people believe they had the support for radicals behind them and could become heroes. This entire production has been staged to create the impression that all clandestine intelligence operations, planned separately in India, the Philippines, Ethiopia, South America, Africa, Mexico etc., are one united radical front.
Some kidnappings actually do take place for political reasons. This has not yet happened inside the U.S.A.
The Hearst kidnapping can be recognized for what it is by the methods it uses; they are all part of every past C.I.A. operation. There is a tendency to simplify the culprits, such as trying to blame the C.I.A. alone for the Watergate affair, or other political assassinations and conspiracies. The fact is that the Pentagon, all branches of the armed forces, and the combined intelligence agencies work together in these plots. Extermination, murder, brain mutilation, electrode implants, and torture are nothing but a continuation of policies begun in Nazi Germany and imported into the United States during World War II.
America is basically a racist country. It is obvious that we do not intend to utilize one of our greatest resources, our minorities, in the system. Because the Intelligence Agency is responsible for their links with known Nazis, I blame them for the zombie killings and California murders, as well as other mass murders across the nation.
Victor Marchetti, who left the C.I.A. after sixteen years, is exposing some of their clandestine operations.
He warned that the "C.I.A. is already targeting on groups in this country that they feel are subversive." The specialty of Mr. Colby's C.I.A. has been to create chaos and social upheaval.
SC: What are the links of the C.I.A., and the "fictitious S.L.A.," to the prison system?
MB: I have been studying political assassinations and conspiracies for ten years. By this time, I have an intimate acquaintance with all of these agencies: their personnel, their funding, their history, their dummy front organizations, and their methods of operation. For the past several years, I have broadened my research of conspiracies into the prison system. It is necessary to understand the use of prisons and prisoners to conceal political murders. The name "Hitler" is synonymous with prisons, because without a sophisticated prison system, Fascism would be no different from a democracy.
SC: But what would be the purpose of creating the S.L.A.?
MB: The overriding fear of the ruling class is that underdeveloped nations and third-world people have begun to demand that attention be paid to their basic needs, such as food, health, and education. At the same time, the population explosion means that more people must be "provided for" by the small handful that makes up the ruling class. To maintain power and what some people consider a "fair" degree of profit from their investments, whether in oil, minerals, industry, or agriculture, the elimination of large masses of population would mean they would have fewer people to deal with.
The average person would not permit or condone genocide, gas chamber, mass extermination, unless he felt personally threatened. Terror is purposely spread in the communities, by pitting blacks against blacks, blacks against whites, Chicanos against blacks and whites, young against old, and prisoners against the communities on the outside. Decreasing the population by drastic measures, instigated through fear, begins to seem feasible and even desirable.
"The Man Who Cried 'I Am,'" a novel by John Williams, includes what is supposed to be a National Security Council document on the systematic planned genocide of all blacks in America. Black leaders today fear, and with good reason, that the "King Alfred Plan" is not fiction.
Another secret plan has been revealed, titled "Heliotrope." The target date for this plan is 1976. This plan includes seizing control of Congress, the assassination of numerous Congressmen, and a complete military take-over. High-ranking Pentagon officials, the intelligence agencies, the Green Berets, and even the Coast Guard are involved.
The Senate Select Committee and other Congressional investigations have remained totally silent about James McCord's position in relation to the military departments that would be utilized for a police state. Capt. Richard L. Franz, Navy Reserve, said McCord was a member of the Office of Emergency Preparedness. This special division, which had fifteen other members, met monthly to develop a list of radicals and contingency plans for censorship of news and U.S. mail in the "event of war." That did not rule out civil war.
"Turnsole," identical to the "King Alfred Plan," calls for rounding up non-white people and eliminating them. None of this would be possible without associating large masses of the population with violent acts. Any person who is more than one quarter non-white will be exterminated. This means the extinction of all Mexicans, Indians, Blacks, Latins, Orientals, and people of mixed blood.
SC: The romantic and obviously artificial style of the S.L.A. talked about uniting all kinds of people: Blacks, Indians, Chicanos and so on. Do you think this was done to associate all these groups with kidnappings and murders, in order to justify their extermination later on?
MB: Yes; and the media will continue to spread these messages of fear until we expose these early para-military operations for what they are.
SC: To spread terror, make people distrust each other, and deliberately create the conditions for a police state...it is difficult to believe that such planning and execution can be going on. This type of activity is so far outside the sphere of most people's lives and desires as to be almost unthinkable.

planned genocide
MB: Just read your morning paper, and see what is taking place in India, Ethiopia, Africa, Southeast Asia, and South America. There are food riots in India. Ethiopia is exporting food, while at the same time, one million Ethiopians are starving. If the Ethiopians are eliminating huge masses of their population, we could do the same thing. One article in this morning's paper stated that the "famine in Ethiopia is bringing prosperity." You might even say we are helping to test out the process. If we allow these things to happen, we will follow their example in a short period of time.
With scarcities of food, water, and energy, riots and murders begin to take place that seem to call for punishment of the most "violent" kind. The evidence of planned genocide is there, right in front of us, if we take the trouble to piece it together.
SC: It is true that what seems to be artificially created scarcities of gasoline, and food staples such as meat and grain, have forced prices up to a point where it is becoming more and more difficult for people to feed themselves and their families. "Famine" is a word that couldn't be used in polite society to refer to conditions in democratic, freedom-loving America; but it is easy to see how these conditions could be pushed slightly further, to the point where it would become impossible for large masses of people to obtain food. We seem to be straying from the subject of the Hearst kidnapping.
MB: Keep in mind that the Hearst script is only the beginning. Wait and see what follows. The poor were lined up for food. The food was thrown at them. A suggestion was made by Governor Reagan that they should be fed "botulism." The stage is set for looking at hungry people and insulting them for their lack of "appreciation"...and acceptance of bags of cabbages disguised as steaks.
SC: Did the FBI know where Patricia Hearst was all along?
MB: The FBI has been behind every domestic conspiracy for the past thirty years. The intelligence agencies provided the safe houses, the agents, the weapons, and the funding. The fictitious S.L.A. "army" numbers 25 people, at most. And it is not an army at all. Their salaries, their cars, their mimeograph machines, and their cyanide bullets have to be paid for by the secret military agencies that funded Oswald, Sirhan, Bremmer, James Ray, and other conspirators. It takes seven or eight launderings of cash before it reaches the hands of many and varied agents. Some are in the army; others are teachers, or prisoners, or landlords; others work voluntarily, not knowing they are part of a larger plot.

the media cooperate
SC: What was the role of the media in the Hearst kidnapping?
MB: From a P.R. point of view, it was beautiful to abduct the daughter of the famous Hearst family known for their newspaper chain. Because she was a member of the Hearst family, Patty's kidnapping is front page news all over the country. It costs $30,000 to buy one minute of advertising, but they got all the publicity for their United States-funded terrorism free.
Reg Murphy was kidnapped because he is the editor of the Atlanta Constitution. Ben Maidenburg, of Akron, Ohio, is the publisher of a newspaper. On March 6, 1974, a group calling itself the American Revolutionary Army made an extortion threat to WJW-TV and WAJR-TV, in Cleveland, threatening to kidnap Maidenburg and his son, and demanding that $2 million be given to "feed the poor."
Lawrence Kwong made an assassination attempt against Jim Dunbar, a well-known radio personality in San Francisco. Kwong held a weapon up to a glass window at KGO, while Dunbar was on the air. The alarming statement that a killer was at the window went out over the air. Then Kwong went inside the building, and killed an employee named Ben Munsen. Following that, he ran down the street and committed suicide. There is good reason to believe that Kwong was surgically programmed to commit this violence. Secrecy regarding his purchase of the weapon, previous hospital care, trip to Hawaii, and autopsy strongly suggest a conspiracy in this case. The "official" investigation was very hushed up, and left more room for doubts than questions answered.
The pattern has been set. The media is geared to expect more kidnappings, and wild "cult" murders. They can now kidnap any person at all, not media-related, and receive instant coverage. The first were media-related kidnappings. People are now being kidnapped at random, to spread terror even further. The message is that no one is safe, rich or poor, princess or pauper.
SC: Another result of a wave of kidnappings might be that people would get used to the idea that other people can suddenly vanish. People who are considered hostile or dangerous to the system could be picked off at will, and it would be explained as "just another kidnapping."
MB: This serves as an alternative to some of the recent elaborate plane crashes, involving the deaths of hundreds of innocent people, which have been arranged to disguise the murder of the one or more people aboard who were the real targets. There seems to be official secrecy as to how Mrs. Howard Hunt's plane was downed. Was it in order to end, or at least control, demands for blackmail money made to the White House? (See "Fatal Plane Crash Linked to Watergate" in BSN No. 16, p. 5.)
SC: The mass media seems to come up with glib, quick answers to all these puzzling events. Key figures are rubbed out while surrounded by thousands of people and "security guards," and the media quickly goes into the "Lone Assassin Chorus;" the Watergate was declared by the press to be a "third-rate burglary;" crucial potential witnesses like Murray Chotiner and William Knowland die mysteriously, and their deaths are immediately proclaimed suicides or accidents.
MB: The usual pattern is for the media to clumsily reveal about half of the story. The other half -- such as evidence that conspiracies exist -- is carefully covered up. Only enough is "revealed" to program the public, convince them they are being told what is going on, confuse them, and throw them off the track.
An important ingredient in the military kidnapping operation was the S.L.A.'s insistence that Patricia's life depended on publication by the media of so-called "radical" tracts. The newspapers and the radio were filled with insults and threats to the "fascist ruling class," the "corporate insect that preys on the people." They listed the financial holdings of Randolph Hearst, an act which would make any corporate burglar jump right through the roof.
SC: The millionaires are getting scared. They are hiring private police to act as personal bodyguards. I understand that the Wackenhut Corporation, a large private police force with headquarters in Florida, headed by a "retired" FBI agent, reported that business is booming, and they are having a hard time keeping up with the demand for their services. The average working person probably wishes he could afford to hire a bodyguard too, but will probably be glad to settle for "free" police protection.
MB: The Shah of Iran was mentioned in one of the early S.L.A. communiques. The purpose of that was to link the oil rulers to U.S. and international terrorist groups. With former C.I.A. chief Richard Helms now stationed in Iran, many provocateur actions in the Middle East and Europe will be associated with the S.L.A. in San Francisco. Listing the investments and the worth of Hearst's objects and possessions has made other greedy feudal lords even more anxious to protect their fortunes from the public. International police will continue to discredit the poor through planned acts of violence, while multiplying the weapons which guard fortunes and investments.

the DeFreeze Story
SC: Where does Donald DeFreeze fit into the Hearst conspiracy?
MB: De Freeze was selected as a patsy several years ago, by the Los Angeles Police Department. He had a long police record of arrests: for stealing 200 guns, for shooting a policeman, and for allegedly making bombs. He never seemed to get put in jail for these crimes. The L.A.P.D. had enough on him to keep him in jail for the rest of his life, if they wanted to. I refer to such men, who have records or are let out on parole, but who are completely at the mercy of the police department as "yo-yos," because they are kept on a string and can be pulled back into jail at any time.
Somebody in law enforcement finally decided to "use" Donald DeFreeze. He was convicted on various charges in 1969, and sent to Vacaville prison on a 6-to14-year sentence.
Donald DeFreeze received extensive psychological testing. He comes from a broken home, has been on the street since he was thirteen, and is divorced. He is highly intelligent; he understands law, and represented himself in court. The L.A.P.D. reports describe him as "a man who lacks an identity."
The criminal conspiracy section of the L.A.P.D., described by Louis Tackwood in his book, "The Glass House Tapes," sent DeFreeze to the California Medical Facility, at Vacaville, which is famous for its behavior modification programs.
Since DeFreeze had been certified by the L.A.P.D. as a man who "had no identity of his own," the behavior modification people at Vacaville decided to give him one. They profiled him after Ruchell Magee, a student of law, a black man who is serving time at San Quentin prison. DeFreeze took the name of "Cinque," a black slave leader, which was also Magee's chosen name for himself.
SC: How would you go about giving a black man a new identity in the California prison system in 1969?
MB: A "Black Cultural Association" (BCA) was formally recognized" by prison officials at Vacaville in 1969, when "tutors" from the community were allowed to come into the program. Various newspaper articles state that the purpose of the "tutors" was "to help inmates with academic subjects--and to introduce new subjects, dealing with black culture, such as black and African history." The "tutors" from the outside community were to help black inmates "understand themselves" and prepare for outside relationships when they were released.
DeFreeze, sent to Vacaviille on a 6-to-14-year sentence, and an important member of the new Black Cultural Association, was hardly thinking about, or eligible for, parole. After his conviction on charges of stealing weapons and shooting a policeman, there is no possible way that DeFreeze would be encouraged or permitted to get revolutionary training while in the California prison system.
In those days, Chief Warden Nelson at San Quentin was saying, "No one can shake hands with a man who has his fist clenched over his head."
And Raymond Procunier, Director of the California State Department of Corrections, proudly announced, "If we've got a group out preaching revolution, and we think it's dangerous, we lock them up."
Why would the California prison system, hell-bent on murdering all radicals and creating conspiracies to separate and segregate potential leaders, begin teaching Maoist doctrine and revolutionary ideas to a new recruit, in Vacaville, of all places? And why bend DeFreeze's and Thero Wheeler's ears with talk about Dr. Marcus Foster, the evil black school superintendent in Oakland, when DeFreeze and Wheeler were not eligible for parole for many years?
Since 1961, J. Edgar Hoover had been sending memos to all the top FBI leaders around the country, ordering them to disrupt any potential racial movements, and to prevent the emergence of a black Messiah who would be able to unite his people.
SC: What kind of tutors would be instructing prisoners in radical politics?
MB: White racists--what other kind? Who are Remiro and Little? Who is "Willie the Wolfe"? Who is Colston Westbrook, the black man who headed the Black Cultural Association at Vacaville? DeFreeze, also known as "Cinque," described Wesbrook, his co-worker and teacher, as "a member of the C.I.A. intelligence, and part of the deadly Phoenix program in Vietnam." The similarities between the terrorization going on in Asia and what is now happening in the San Francisco Bay area are too striking to take this charge lightly. William Colby, now Chief of C.I.A. operations in the United States, formerly headed the Phoenix program in Vietnam. We can expect the planned terrorization of the U.S. population to escalate rapidly.
Westbrook was mistrusted by even the straight press when he met them for an interview. He served seven years in the military: three in the Army, and four in the Air force, including four years in Korea. He told the Daily Californian that in 1965, he went to the American Embassy in Tokyo to "try to get some veterans benefits," and was offered "ten grand to go to Vietnam." He spent five years in Vietnam and Cambodia, "doing all sorts of things." When one reporter asked him exactly what he did in Vietnam, he said, "I was working on contracts for an architectural firm."
The Watergate exposures documented how Miami architects were offered huge amounts of money, all from the C.I.A., to come from the White House, in exchange for crucial plans of room structures, and particularly air conditioning vents, related to the rooms where the 1972 nominations would take place. Governments can be overthrown and regimes toppled if palace entrances are known and sealed off. There are other advantages, from a military point of view, including knowing architectural entrances and exits to buildings, i.e., Robert Kennedy's walk through the kitchen pantry at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles.
Westbrook said he had a "personal line of communication with the Premier of Cambodia." Donald DeFreeze and Thero Wheeler, black prisoners, must have been proud of their elite instructor, who chose to visit them every week, twice a week, for two years.
"Newsmen present were puzzled by Westbrook. Some thought it was just an ego trip. Others went away with all sorts of uncomfortable suspicions."

Enter Claude Kirk
Willie Wolfe came from Pennsylvania in 1971, but was not known to have any interest in blacks before he went west. Russell Little and Robyn Steiner migrated to Berkeley in the fall of 1972, from Florida. Watergate didn't begin to expose the extent of espionage operations from that state. Florida's former governor, Claude Kirk, ran a campaign a few years ago from Miami, which included threats to "break the University of California."
The day after Ronald Reagan and Claude Kirk were elected Governors of the two states, they met for lunch in Los Angeles. On the following day, Clark Kerr, President of the then-outstanding University of California, was fired, with absolutely no notice, and no severance pay.
Kirk was also the first Governor in the United States to hire a private police force. He used the same Wackenhut group whose contracts have increased following the Hearst kidnapping. A spokesman for the Wackenhut Corporation said that thirty-eight requests for information about protection had been received in a 24-hour period, as of February 25.
In Lauderhill, Florida, on February 22, as a result of the kidnapping of Reg Murphy in Atlanta, Georgia, "uniformed police and armed members of the Lauderhill Police Department walked with several golfers in the Jackie Gleason Inverrary Classic." Plainclothes policemen were also reported circulating in the galleries at the golf tournament.
George Wachenhut, head of the Wackenhut Corporation, put it so well: "Those days of the open, relaxed American way of life are over."
SC: Is that what the Patricia Hearst kidnapping is all about?
MB: Exactly. There was a mass migration of at least eight out-of-state people to Berkeley. Emily and Bill Harris, college graduates, migrated to Berkeley from Indiana, in the fall of 1972. Angela and Gary Atwood also migrated to Berkeley from Indiana at the same time. California prisons were exploding with racial violence and imported provocateurs. Why were out-of-state agents allowed to stir up more trouble? What social and political background did these people have to enter the prisons? What were their qualifications? What were their motives? All these white "migratory birds" were involved in helping DeFreeze get his black education." After the kidnapping of Patricia Hearst, they split, leaving homes and jobs, and have not been seen since. Incredible -- and impossible -- and identical to all previous conspiracies I have studied. They suddenly cropped up in the California prisons; they all lived near each other; and after their assignment was over, they simply melted back into the woodwork, going on to other cities, other jobs, other schools. The media said they "vanished."
This reminds me of another white "do-gooder" who was involved in the untimely and tragic death of prisoner George Jackson at San Quentin. Stephen Bingham provided the excuse for what was to be a big shoot-out, following his visit with Jackson. Bingham was last seen, after leaving San Quentin, visiting with his uncle, Woodridge Bingham....who served in the U.S. Navy, with Naval Intelligence, and the O.S.S. (Office of Strategic Services), the forerunner of the C.I.A., from 1943-1945. Were there military connections behind the long imprisonment of the victims of this conspiracy? Louis Tackwood, in "The Glass House Tapes," tells of the role of the L.A.P.D., military, and law enforcement agencies in prison conspiracies.
Now, a few years after George Jackson's death, the military and the Department of Corrections are once more bringing in white people, under the guise of friendship. When they all go back to where they came from, minority and other prisoners are left with the painful loss of the few privileges they had.
While in prison, Donald DeFreeze was told he could become a hero to the poor, oppressed minorities. He was surrounded by military intelligence.
When Jack Ruby was arrested in Dallas, Texas, following the murder Lee Harvey Oswald, a document was found on the seat of his car. It was a pitch on "heroism," written by Warren Carroll of the C.I.A., for H.L. Hunt's Dallas radio program, "Lifeline."
Around the time that Kennedy died in Dallas, Jack Ruby had been in the company of two known hypnotists. One of them was CIA agent David Ferrie, from New Orleans. The other was Billie Del Mar, who was then entertaining in Jack Ruby's Carousel Club. Del Mar fled from Dallas the day of the Kennedy assassination, and was never called to testify before the Warren Commission. With the help of Carroll's script on heroism, Ruby could believe that by killing Oswald, he was performing a heroic act. His explanation was, "I wanted to show them that a Jew had guts." It seems Ruby was performing for genuine anti-semites. He obviously wanted their approval.
SC: Are mind control, psychosurgery, or hypnotism used in political assassinations and conspiracies?
MB: The extent and scope of these methods of ordering behavior and erasing memory, following these acts of murder, has to be exposed. You can erase the memory of a murder from a person's mind through hypnosis. You can also implant the conviction that a man has committed a murder, when in fact, he has not.
This happened in the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, where it was suggested to Sirhan Sirhan, by his psychiatrist, how he killed Robert Kennedy. Evidence exists to disprove this theory.
It is vital that we scrutinize what sort of "treatment" is going on in our hospitals and prisons. If the "King Alfred" and "Heliotrope" plans are to be put into effect, they require secrecy. Including the prison system in the race-war kidnapping script provides an excuse to keep "outside visitors" out of the prison system. The official excuse will be that they are causing violence inside the prison, or that violence from inside the prison is "spilling out on the streets." Through the planned use of selected provocateurs, the Department of Corrections can now screen prisoners' mail, visitors, media interviews, and accessibility to medical records.
SC: DeFreeze and Wheeler both escaped from California prisons within a short time of each other. That seemed a little peculiar to me. Do you find any similarities between the prison escapes of DeFreeze, Wheeler, and James Earl Ray?

a staged escape
MB: After two years of heavy programming, DeFreeze's mentors at Vacaville apparently decided that he was ready for the next step in the script: his "escape." DeFreeze was transferred from Vacaville to Soledad Prison, near Salinas, California, in December, 1973. Four months later, in March, 1974, DeFreeze "escaped" from Soledad. But using the word "escape" is misleading; the facts are, that DeFreeze was placed in a situation at Soledad where all he had to do was walk away from the prison.
DeFreeze's escape from Soledad parallels James Earl Ray's "escape" from the Missouri penitentiary. Eighteen months later, Ray became the alleged assassin of Martin Luther King. Ray was a patsy too. Now Ray seems to want to tell the truth about the assassination of Martin Luther King, and one of the things he said, in a recent press conference, was, "Ask them how I got out of jail."
A prisoner from Soledad has stated, "While Donald DeFreeze was here, I had a few conversations with him. I have always questioned his departure as being a simple walk-away. I didn't come in contact with him personally until his last couple of weeks here. There weren't many who would associate with him. He tried to give the impression of being super-cool, and he came across as cold. When I met him, he was working in the maintenance shop. I asked him if he was happy on his job, because if not, I might be able to find him something else. He replied that within a few days he was going to be assigned to work in the boiler room at the South Facility.
"On his first night, he was dropped off at midnight, and given a few instructions. His job was automatic; it only required an overseer. Then he was left to himself, and when an officer returned an hour later to check on him, he was gone."
SC: First night on the job.
MB: He went right over the fence, and a change of clothing was provided by a still anonymous friend. I might add that most of the residents around Soledad are families of prison guards. They are not noted for giving changes of clothing to black convicts who come to their doors between midnight and 1:00 a.m. A car gave him a lift to the Bay area. Another convenience: Amanda de Normanville, who reportedly visited DeFreeze at Vacaville, "was suspected of giving him refuge after he escaped from Soledad."
An intelligent man escapes from prison. Ordinarily, he would assume that the authorities would be looking for him. He would certainly not associate with people who had been known to visit him in prison. He would try to avoid contact with these people. Russell Little and Robyn Steiner had corresponded with the Department of Corrections about DeFreeze.
DeFreeze did just the opposite of what you might expect. He phoned his pals in the Berkeley-Oakland area immediately. They housed him. He associated with his "tutors" from Vacaville, who had various part-time jobs in the Berkeley area. All of them were "underemployed" in terms of their educational background. Two of them worked in adjacent food stalls near the U.C. Berkeley campus--yet supposedly they did not know each other.
After DeFreeze's escape, the police made no attempt to contact any of the people he had spent so much time with while he was at Vacaville. This indicates police collusion.
DeFreeze escaped from Soledad in March, 1973. Patty Hearst was kidnapped one year later. During the year in between, DeFreeze tried to join Los Venceremos, offering himself as a "hit man." Venceremos turned him down. They did not trust him; they were not into killing and violence. The radical groups in the Bay area wanted nothing to do with DeFreeze.
SC: I can't understand where DeFreeze's head was at this time. Did he know he was acting as a government agent? Had he accepted the role of Spy, in order to get out of jail? If so, then he couldn't really believe he was going to be a hero; he would know the whole operation was staged to hurt black people. He must have been aware that his jail break had been planned and engineered for him.
MB: DeFreeze was probably given a large hero pitch--probably something to the effect that the abduction of Patricia Hearst would rally the radical groups, and cause them to be socially involved once more. Violence by provocateurs had broken up all political movements following the Kent State killings and the bombing of Cambodia.
He accepted the favors given to him by the L.A.P.D. and the Department of Corrections. I am sure "Cinque" thought there was a large army of sympathetic people who would back him up.
The L.A.P.D. had fore-knowledge of the Marin County Courthouse shoot-out, where Judge Haley was killed and others were wounded--and I don't mean fore-knowledge of the psychic variety. Jonathan Jackson, the patsy, had been promised a back-up, and another truck to assist him to free the captive prisoners. But when the action started, nobody was there to help him, and Jonathan Jackson was slain. So-called "friends" leave their patsies in the lurch, as in the case of Lee Harvey Oswald and other unsuspecting victims of espionage operations. (See "Jailbreak" in BSN No. 10, p. 2. From the above, it would appear that Jackson, Judge Haley, and other escapees and hostages were all patsies in what was essentially an attempt to convict Angela Davis of murder for having procured the guns used by Jackson.)
Eight months after the killing of Oswald, Jack Ruby begged Chief Justice Earl Warren, Representative Gerald Ford, and C.I.A. attorney Leon Jaworski to give him a chance to tell what happened in Dallas. Ruby realized that he had been double-crossed, and warned that if he were not heeded, "a whole new form of government would take place." He said, "Because of the act I committed," there would be massive killings and violence. Needless to say, Jack Ruby was never given the chance to tell his story; he died shortly after the interview.
DeFreeze was fully aware of how to get out of jail, where to go, and how to live for almost a year, without being arrested. He was provided with homes, food, weapons, transportation, and companions. At the Berkeley Library they copied drawings of a seven-headed cobra, used in S.L.A. literature, which had also been used as a symbol by black C.I.A. agent Ron Karenga and the L.A.P.D. (BSN note: This scenario appears in the 1969 novel, "The Spook Who Sat By the Door," by Sam Greenlee. In the story Dan Freedman, the first black C.I.A. agent, defects to organize a secret guerrilla army, known as the Cobras.)
Russell Little, a close associate of DeFreeze, and well-known by the Department of Corrections, both at Vacaville and Soledad, was arrested on charges of killing Dr. Marcus Foster on January 11, 1974. The law enforcement officials had three weeks in which to link suspect Little to escapee DeFreeze.
The proof of a giant conspiracy in this case, is the fact that no police went to search for Little's or DeFreeze's other contacts in the weeks before the Hearst kidnapping. They had talked frequently about Dr. Marcus Foster while "instructing inside the prisons." Yet nobody broke into the various Bay area dwellings where their companions were getting ready for "America's first political kidnapping."
These military agents presented themselves to DeFreeze as romantic Robin Hoods. When the heat was on, they split.
After two months of anxiety regarding Patricia Hearst's kidnapping, a photograph and tape were sent out to further outrage middle America. This lovely girl, who only two months before was happily selecting her china in anticipation of a traditional marriage, was calling her father, publicly, a "liar," holding a machine gun, promising to fight alongside of her brothers and sisters in the S.L.A., and denouncing her fiance and family.
Tension was building in the Bay area. Was Patty a member of the S.L.A.? Had she been forced to renounce her background? Was she making love to DeFreeze? How far would the establishment go in allowing such a display of arrogance? And how dumb can the American people be?

Patty's Fate
The media, the Hearst family, and the public are being fed the propaganda that the terrorists may have brainwashed Patricia Hearst. Nobody considers the fact that the C.I.A. and the intelligence establishment could brainwash Patty as they have the other agents used in their conspiracies.
We are going to see a great number of articles in the future from so-called experts and public officials. They will warn about more violence, more kidnappings, and more terrorists.
Mass media, the armed forces, and intelligence agencies will saturate our lives with fascist scare tactics and "predictions" that have already been planned to come true.
Whether Patty Hearst was allowed to live, or whether she is murdered, is no longer important in the general game plan. The scare tactics, armed forces in the streets, prolonged anger against her abduction, and fear for the future safety of others, is taking place.
SC: The majority of citizens believe radicals were responsible for these acts of violence. Is there any way we can halt this devastation process?
MB: It is the American fantasy that we never assassinated our President in Dallas, Texas. Only "lone assassins" are capable of this act. It is the same fantasy that we don't kill our own citizens, including the daughter of one of the team. What links the future murders to past murders is a chain of evidence hat becomes easier to identify with every criminal act.
All that is required to halt this madness is enough aroused citizens to examine the evidence of government complicity and conspiracy in this case.

Home

Mae Brussell Talks About Charles Manson (1971)

2011-12-10T10:35:00.002-06:00

LISTEN NOWOctober 13, 1971 - Side 1 (30 min.) MP3 Audio
October 13, 1971 - Side 2 (30 min.) MP3 Audio

Transcription below

Dialogue: Assassination

Broadcast of October 13, 1971
http://maebrussell.com/Transcriptions/16.html

GLORIA BARON: This is Dialogue: Assassination, with research specialist Mae Brussell. For KLRB I'm Gloria Baron.
Well, Mae, we promised them last week that you would be doing the Manson trial this week. I guess from the looks of things you're ready.
MAE BRUSSELL: Yes. I'm ready and I'm not ready. I would like lots of hours on this, but it's really big and we'll get right into it. I had ten other subjects I wanted to talk about today, but it would delay the Manson story, so we'll go into it, Gloria, right away.
In this world, in this strange world of covert overthrow of the governments and clandestine armies and secret operations, the problem we're facing is that you are working with two realities: you're working with what we assume is the real way to function and move, and we are working with a system of what we call power: exchange of power, economic power, power over people; controlling their lives. In order to do that you disguise certain persons and send them into roles to influence; they become actors on a stage and they influence our minds in a way that is not real but effect a reality that will touch us later.
A propos of the Manson thing: the Oda trial; the murder of the Oda family goes on trial Monday, with accused murderer, Fazier. It's in the paper today. That was not a hippie murder—I've said it before. They took the trial out of Santa Cruz up to Redwood City. We'll do a show on the Oda trial, but the Manson trial effects this particular geographic area, it's close to us; it's close to home.
California was where the flower children were. Big Sur was the home of people like Joan Baez, Henry Miller, free souls, artists roaming. California was an important state in terms of conspiracies to kill candidates and presidents, and to effect national policy. It's part of the military-industrial-complex. I'm going to explain why the murder of Sharon Tate and the other persons in her home was a political massacre. Other researchers have done work on John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King. I was the first researcher in the United States to turn the other peoples' minds to the fact that the same lawyers, the same planners, the same teams originated this particular massacre, and what effect it would have on our society.
It had to be planned well in advanced of when it happened. I'm going to give you my conclusions on the Manson—I call it the Manson trial because nobody talks about it being Charles Watson's massacre. That's the boy who killed seven people, but the news media associates the name Charles Manson [with the killings]. He made the picture on the cover of Life; He is the man that you associate with killing Sharon Tate. Many people don't even know the name Charles Watson, because you're not supposed to know it. Right now there's a hung jury in Los Angeles on the decision of whether Charles Watson is guilty of murdering seven people. He was in the home. He did the stabbing forty times. He wrote "death to the pigs" on the door. The jury can't decide if he was guilty.
My conclusions are, number one: that all of these persons involved—the major people—are agent provaceteurs. They come at a time to increase violence, to come down on a segment of our society prior to an election year to make law and order necessary to protect us from the people at large in our society.
Number two: Charles Manson was a patsy. He is identical, historically, to Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, and James Ray. Charles Manson killed nobody in the Sharon Tate home or in the La Bianca home. He was being charged with these murders and he didn't kill any one of those seven people. He was used. He was a person who had been in jail twenty-two of his thirty-two years of life. He was the product of our penal system. He was not a hippie or a part of the youth culture. They bought him a guitar, let his hair grow, put a leather jacket on him, gave him money, gave him a bus and credit cards, and told him to do his thing.
It was like James Ray was a part of our penal system. He was in Missouri in jail, he met with certain persons, and the next day he was out and there was twenty, thirty thousand dollars of money spent. He traveled continents and everywhere. He was to be used at a certain time and place.
Charles Manson was identical to James Ray, as a product of our penal system. He was used by the news media to slam down on the hippies. We could do one hour on the news control of how your brain is shaped to believe that Charles Manson made a robot out of a nice white Christian boy from Texas. Isn't this terrible? This kind of a criminal mind? He was used.
Now I'm going into my background of these opinions because they may be startling. People who think they're knowledgeable on our economy, or on the other assassinations, who never believed the Warren Report, throw up their hands. I spoke to somebody just this morning before I came in the studio and said I was doing a show on Manson, and this particular person, educated, informed, said, "That is something I never—I'm not interested in Manson. I'd never think about that particular human being." People turn off on Manson.
This is the way my mind was going in 1963. I told you how I was studying the death of John Kennedy, starting November 22nd. I was studying the use and the misuse of power, after the president of the United states had been killed. I wanted to know who killed him and what kind of people they were. What was their interest? What was their philosophy? What was their politics? How many of them believed Adolf Hitler should have won World War Two? How many of the people involved in that assassination worked in our State Department, defense industry, or had important government positions, like in the Cabinet now? Or in the Republican National Committee? This country that is current today, I've been studying since '63. I studied the Cold War, the military-industrial-complex of the United States. What we formally call capitalism verses communism, which now is a disguised fascism—with the electoral process over—verses communism. I studied the economic and philosophical policies of both systems, and the religious revolution that was going on simultaneously.
In April 1967 the Greek government was overthrown by a military Junta. There is a book—I tell you, have your pencil ready for the program. I want you to write down this book. It's pertinent to the Manson-Sharon Tate massacres. It's called Death of a Democracy: Greece and the American Conscience. It's written by Stephen Rousseas. When Greece was overthrown, the excuse for the Junta to take power and end the electoral process was that there was tension and chaos. And they had to prevent that. They had to prevent the May election.
The man who was running to be the president of Greece was Papandreou who captured the imagination of the young people. Now I'm reading a quote from the book Death of a Democracy:
"...Papandreou captured the imagination of young people and many members of the professional and intellectual classes....He was popular in Greece..." and he was linked psychologically "...with the late President Kennedy." He was "...a man of style and intellect."
They thought that for the first time in thirty years they would get a program growing where they'd have a democratic government. The people in power felt that no one should tamper with their existing institutional structure. They kept the power and canceled the elections.
The edicts in Greece, when Greece was overthrown, were the following: If it was an economic problem, or political problem, like We don't want communists. We've got to save you from communists, that's one thing. But the edicts I noticed in April 1967, when Greece was overthrown, [showed me that] the United States had exchanged power. I copied my newspaper right away. I was reading the daily papers because I was studying power and the exchange of power. I was studying Greece; I study every country. These were the edicts:
No gathering in the open country of more than five persons.
No gathering in any close space at all.
No anti-national propaganda, such as anti-war or anything against a public official.
No marches or dissensions.
And we will now have what Rousseas describes as a puritan orgy: there would be no beards or long hair on the men. No mini-skirts on the girls. Everyone in Greece had to attend a Sunday church, [including tourists]; Sunday church was mandatory. They called it a Christian coup, because the Jews traditionally do not go to church on Sunday. But if you did not go to church on Sunday you could be exiled to an island and arrested. It was similar to the inquisition in Spain. The students were to turn in every old history book they had, and it would be replaced with a new one. Racial purity was proclaimed. And the theories of Darwin and de Vries were thrown out. They were ordered to protect their Christianity, on a public order that was passed in 1942 by the Nazis; It was revived again.
All legitimate theaters were to submit their scripts.
Does this sound—I'll end the quote for one minute—does it sound like our own theater where they're asking Powerplay recently in the theater in town here in Carmel, where the director was removed because they wanted to examine the scripts?
Now let's get back to the other book; back to the quotation:
They wanted the right to delete scripts or rewrite scripts anywhere from the Greek tragedies to the modern. Every play from antiquity to the present was to be censored.
Music would be selected. Bob Dylan, the Beatles wouldn't be allowed at all. No music from Tchaikovsky, Prokofiev, any Russian composer, even prior to the Russian Revolution.
And Greece was quickly transformed into the first fascist dictatorship on European soil since Mussolini and Hitler.
Now I looked at those edicts and I knew that the one problem in the United States was going to be a revolution that was coming along in our country. Because, just as I analyzed in 1963, on November 22nd, I said to myself, "Is Jack Ruby in that jail to kill Oswald to silence him?" My brain began to work with what I was reading about the edicts in Greece, because these were not communist edicts, this was a sociological thing.
I knew in the summer of '67—this was the spring when it was happening—that something very big in the United States was coming to ahead. Because I live in the Peninsula here; I'm close to a movement that was growing. Going back and forth from San Francisco to Big Sur, spending my summers at Sur, I could see something really good in a true Judao-Christian tradition of people making it, sharing their housing, sharing their food, rapping. I realized that in this country we had a revolution. There was a revolution of hair-style, clothing, cosmetics, transportation, housing, value system, churches—there was an economic revolution. It effected the cosmetic industry, canned foods, grocery revolution, dietary habits, dwellings, the use of land. No longer needing dwellings; meeting outdoors, no high rent for each separate family; sharing one place. People were delivering their own babies instead of spending $250 for the obstetrician. They were recycling old clothes; going to the Good Will, making their own things, wearing burlap, sharing, doing without, withdrawing from spectator sports or amusements; they weren't sitting and watching people throw a pigskin ball back and forth.
These are revolutions: economic and sociological. They were breaking the boundaries where white and black could rap. They lived together. They slept together. You didn't know somebody's background, if they were rich or poor. You didn't know if they were Jew or Gentile. Those boundaries were thrown out the window in '67. Greece was putting them back, but America was throwing them out the window. And the country club thing was going by the wayside. Zoning laws were ignored; if you have a zoning place in a fancy residential [area], the children are leaving those homes. They are living where there is no zoning. They are up on the land in the communes. They've left their parents in their big homes and they leave the zoning laws behind; they just split. Real estate values are effected because the kids aren't going to buy the house with the picket fence any longer and live two people in that dwelling.
Now this was an economic, sociological necessity in our system as it existed in terms of capitalists, and whether to survive. The Rand Corporation and other think tanks in America decide what to do for the United States of America.
This was the year of the Beatles. It was the summer of Sgt. Pepper, the Monterey Pop, Haight Ashbury, the Renaissance, make your own candle, turn off your electricity, sit and turn on with your friends and rap it over: What is life about? The generation was born with an atomic bomb over their heads. They weren't going to live long anyway, so there wasn't that much time for hate. They were really making it. My car was filled with kids; hitch-hikers everywhere; I picked strangers off the streets. They slept in our home, slept in the yards, too. Monterey Pop came that weekend. We were there everyday and I picked people off the road and our house was filled. It was the most beautiful thing. I still have yard furniture; they all painted chairs and tables and everyone pitched in. It was just—it was human beauty and they were making it together.
But that isn't the way it was meant to be made by U.S. Steel and General Motors and Kaiser Aluminum. They want to sell you your own car, your own house, and your own washing machine and dryer.
So in my cross-filing system—because you see this is the summer of '67 and I've been on the assassinations for four years—I started a file called Greece. I didn't watch Greece at all until the coup. I said: Is this a test case of what the United States could do to its people if it had to? Because those edicts were set up very strangely if it were a communist verses a right-wing coup. I did all of the research right up to the present day; anything that comes about Greece. Marilyn (?) McCurry was on a national television show this morning. I watched her talking about Greece. It's current.
So I watched who overthrew Greece. I watched the Pompus (?) Foundation. We've talked about them on the air. They're the men that siphoned the money—Standard Oil of New Jersey, linked with Richard Nixon, Donald Nixon, Spiro Agnew. Agnew's in Greece today as we talk.
I have a file that started in '67, and every article from all the magazines or books that I could get follows up who overthrew Greece: the Litton Industry, the fascists in this country put those edicts in there. Now if they put them in there and it worked they could put them down on us.
I have another file I started in 1967. I told you before I have 1600 subject categories of current news. And I started a file called Hippies. Because articles in '67 were coming out. It was a sociological phenomenon. And in the envelopes that I have I began articles like:
Who recognizes something good in this movement?
Who was putting it down?
What is their philosophy?
Hippies that were interviewed in magazines like Ramparts or New York Times.
What are they saying about themselves?
What are people saying about them?
I realized that it was going to be stopped in some way, because it was taking hold; It captured the basic good that is in people. I don't believe in the doctrine of original sin, I believe in original goodness. And these children had it; They have it. Somebody was going to have to get them.
Yesterday's paper had an article that the head of the whole Navy of South Vietnam said: You are going to have to rule out sex. They have a Navy of 40,000 men. And he said, You were going to have to rule out sex. It's decadent. If you want to fight the communists you've got to stop that. You're a bunch of filthy worms," he said. The head of the Navy in Vietnam said, "In order to really fight the communists you've got to stop youre sexual activity," the Navy [in Vietnam] was told yesterday.
Now these are the same people: Mr. Key(?) and the fascists, and the same people in Greece, and the people in South Vietnam, who are coming down on the kids. Their sexual fantasies, their fears that their kids could do what they never could do. I'd like to do a whole show on sexual repressions and fascism and coming down.
I had a friend I met who worked at the Diggers, and they were being handed bad acid by disguised agent provaceteurs, to begin to burn their bellies out and rob their minds. [And that's the way] the Diggers were [being treated] up there. This can be documented. I know that the federal government were throwing things out at pop festivals. They allowed people like Melvin Belli—who worked with Jack Ruby—was the man in on the Altamont thing. That brings the pressure. We'll go on to that some other day; on pop festivals and music, and what happened to the music scene, and the musicians at the Monterey Pop Festival.
So I was watching how the hippie scene would be put down and what evidence there was that they had to crack it. I've mentioned on two different programs that in my neighborhood a man moved in from Texas. I think he gets tired of me talking about this, so this is the last time I'll mention him. He was dressed as a hippie, but he wasn't a hippie. He brought his children into this community. He lived a block from my house. He wrote a book for Henry Kaiser called Children of Change. (I'm repeating for somebody who hasn't heard the show.) A non-hippie from Texas, he lived here for about one or two years, walking down the coast, going the music scene. And he wrote, just prior to the Sharon Tate murders, that, "...the hippies would have made it..." —this is what Henry Kaiser published— "...would have made it if, number one: they had a sense of humor. And number two: they weren't so violent.
If anybody had a sense of humor that generation did. Because there wasn't much to be funny about—the way the Cold War was going after Korea and everything like that. I have a button collection. People who've been to my home see it. I started this around those years, and I have a whole wall with thousands of buttons. And it's funny. They did have a sense of humor. The kids were beautiful. And they laughed. There were very funny things. If you read the button it says sociological things. I have the sense of humor of that generation. And I collected the car bumper stickers for a while, but it got too expensive, so I save the buttons.
They did have a sense of humor and there was no violence at all. This same particular man referred to his wife and hippie-women as witches. And she wasn't a witch. She was a very establishment Texas girl who is the wife of this man that was dressed as a hippie.
He is now at the Navy post-graduate school; He's Navy. He had to be Navy Intelligence. How did he get into the Navy post-graduate school if his undergraduate school was being a hippie on Big Sur road, walking back and forth on the highway?
So this particular man had his gun and his scopes and his knives and things. And I watched, and there was no massacre. And I was watching the phenomena. How was our government going to handle it?
In the summer of 1969 there was a murder in Hollywood, California in which Sharon Tate, Jay Sebring, Mr. Frokowski, Abigail Folger, Steve Parent, and Mr. and Mrs. La Bianca were stabbed forty-four times. The newspaper did not know who did the murders, but it read in my mind like a military ambush. It could be no other way. It was described by people later as a military ambush. And for the reasons as this: These many people were slaughtered; nobody heard a sound; there were dogs on the grounds that didn't say boo; there was a caretaker in a guest cottage who didn't hear one gun go off, and guns went off; they didn't hear any screaming; nobody saw a getaway car; the place was completely destroyed; there was time to put hoods over the people, ropes on their neck, leave signs and symbols that would come down on a particular group of our society—two groups—and split. And no, not a dog was killed or barked. The fellow that lives on the grounds said he slept through it. And they shimmied up the telephone poles, cut the wires, left all this obvious evidence, and split. And the way the wires and the lines were cut I felt that it had to be a military type ambush.
The total effect was to appear, or wanted to appear, that if they didn't catch the murderers of these people they would come down on the blacks—that was their hope.
It's very interesting in my research on the assassinations that the very first man to publish an article on the Sharon Tate murder in my collection of the murders, before they had a suspect—the murders were in August, and they found the suspects in December—was a man named Ed Butler. In October '69 he wrote an article. The man who publishes the newspaper that he writes for is Patrick Frawley of Schick Razor and Technicolor, who is one of the third largest supporters of Richard Nixon—a far right-wing person. And he hires Ed Butler to write articles for him. Ed is an agent provaceteur who worked with Lee Harvey Oswald in New Orleans. When Oswald had the cover story that he was a communist, Ed Butler made a record for him. [This was] when Oswald said he was a member of the Fair Play for Cuba [Committee]. And he was the only member of the New Orleans area, and Ed Butler knew it. Ed Butler worked with Lee Harvey Oswald, so it's interesting that in 1969 the first person who has an opinion on who murdered these seven people would be Ed Butler; In my collection of articles we have Ed Butler. Now, what is this article called? It says Did Hate Kill Tate? And he goes into the fact that the Black Panthers are tied into the communists, and the evidence is that the Panthers killed these people; [they came] into middle class America and spread terror.
This is what we call provaceteurs, agent provaceteurs, clandestine governments: where somebody is the first one in, and he's tied with all these other people and links. And he is taking your brain now and your gray matter. In the event they don't have a suspect, he is saying here are the clues:
Number one: the hood over the draped bodies—was it a turn about for the Ku Klux Klan?
Number two: the rope found around their bodies, strung body to body is an ironic reminder to lynchings.
Number three: the words "death to pigs" that were scrawled with the human blood over the front door—was that a challenge to Blue Meanies?
Remember the Beatles made a movie about Blue Meanies. He's throwing the whole thing in.
And number four: Time magazine quoted an article that Jay Sebring was supposed to be anti-black.
So you see, Ed Butler has you in the palm of his hand. If they don't have a suspect, you're going to think that the blacks come into fancy residential homes and massacre these lovely white people.
To make that even worse, when the people were arrested they admitted on their own volition that they took the credit cards from Mr. and Mrs. La Bianca after they cut their bellies open and stuck—they went to the ice box to eat, and then took their forks and stuck the forks in their stomachs. They took out their credit cards and left them in the black part of town in Los Angeles so the people would think the blacks killed the La Biancas.
To back up my own feelings, every word from what these people said afterward confirms what I knew they were doing. They could come down on two groups, one for sure. And if they're caught they'll come down on the second. So the first group was to press fear that the blacks are now in our part of town, that they're communists, and they hate the rich.
Ed Butler goes into their motives, and he says, "Well, one of the things is that Mr. Polanski is an ex-patriot from communist Poland, and we know the Panthers are communists." And he said the hate and propaganda they have will make other people want to continue these murders. He said that the Panthers were doing this kind of murdering to test the stomach of America for future violence. Ed Butler: the authority on riots. He comes out all the time in the news. He said that they want to see how many of these massacres people will take. He's convinced that the blacks did this murder. But he is covered because when the actual facts came out it turns out that it wasn't the blacks at all. So what are you left with now? You're left with a hippie group; You're left with this great hippie clan. This is where the real problem comes in, because, as I said before, and I'll say it over and over today, Charles Manson was not a hippie.
When they arrested Charles Manson, Sue Atkins was in jail for stealing some parts to an automobile, and the chicks squealed. The police department didn't even have any clue in this murder at all; They didn't even want it; I know the Los Angeles Police Department didn't want to find them. But this particular girl broke down in jail and told another woman, and that's how they were found; The police department did not find them; Just like the FBI did not find James Earl Ray; Scotland Yard did it; when Ray just had just one foot on the plane and one foot to Rhodesia where he would never be extradited, Scotland Yard did it; the FBI didn't do it.
What happened was that the police had to go to where the Manson Family lived. And what did they find there? They found what the newspaper described as a ritualistic killing done by self-confessed hippies, in what they called a military-style commune.
First, the news media should define the word hippie. Because the hippies that I knew from '67 to '69 didn't mean a military operation in any sense of the word, nor in anybody else's mind in the world. Nor did it to the Rand Corporation, or the President of the United States, or John Mitchell. Hippie did not mean military; it was anti-military; it was anti-war; it was the let's get it together generation.
So when they found the real killer and he has this beard and guitar, we just can't call him an ex-convict. They have to call it a military-style commune. We must have military-style communes in Vietnam if a commune is where people all live together and you are military; it's a military commune. It certainly isn't a hippie commune, but they have to make it a hippie thing.
Now what did they have in the commune? They had shacks with lookout points; they had telescopes; they had walkie-talkies; they had military field telephones; they had collections of knives and shotguns; they had four-wheel drive [dune buggies]. The neighbors turned them in for threatening them. They drove all night and made so much noise that the neighbors said, "You know, you keep us awake." And they said, "Oh, we'll kill you if you don't shut up." They threatened their lives.
Then the news media picked up right away that evidently the crime had all the marks of premeditation. They mentioned then that the telephone wires were cut at the Tate home. I remember that in August, but in December when they were discovered, they went into the shears and the problem of the weapons.
Sheriff Tom Montgomery of Colin County in Texas was taking care of his cousin at the time that the police came into this little commune that Sue Atkins was talking about. Cousin Charles 'Tex' Watson was safe in Texas. He was watched by this first cousin of his. He was described as clean-cut with short hair. He was living a happy life. His girlfriend testified they were having pleasant sexual relationships. He was normal in every sense of the word. Those seven massacres that he did didn't seem to bother him at all. He didn't even mention them to her. He was not mentally sick. He was not depressed. He had a good job. And when Charles Manson and the others were arrested in Los Angeles they put this young boy, Charles Watson, in the jail with his cousin to take care of him.
Now we're going into 'Who was Charles Manson?'
GLORIA: All right, we'll do that in just a moment. You're listening to Dialogue: Assassination, with Mae Brussell. This is KLRB, stereo FM, Carmel by the Sea.
(END OF SIDE ONE)

MAE: Now we're going to talk briefly about Charles Manson and Charles Watson, the implications in this particular case, how I follow it, and why it's of interest to me. Because every case beyond what the news media tells you, you're looking for facts. Like in the Oswald case, they tell you that Oswald was a communist, or he was a misfit in society. But then when I see my documents, that he had cameras, walkie-talkies, electronic devices, and security clearances—then I want to know more about Lee Harvey Oswald. And I want to know more about Charles Manson, because he was thirty-two and he did spend twenty-two years of his life in jail.
A prominent attorney by the name of George Shibley who works with groups in the Middle East—in Beverly Hills he has powerful connections—met with Charles Manson just before he got out of jail in Treasure Island. No one will know what conversation transpired between Mr. Shibley [and Manson], or why he was up there. Or why Charles Manson is unknown. This illegitimate child of a sixteen year-old girl, no family or kin. No one would know how Charles Manson would get such a famous Beverly Hills attorney to visit him before he was paroled. No one will ever know the conversation that transpired between those men. But what we do know is that when Charles Manson got out of Treasure Island in 1967, at the height of the Haight Ashbury scene, he got a large bus. And he did not buy it. He did not have a job, and he had credit cards for gasoline. In the trial some subject was made up that one of the girls stole a credit card from her family to buy Charlie gasoline. I am sure the parents would have had him arrested before long; you can't go for two years on a stolen credit card. Charlie was never arrested. And one of the questions in one of the articles I have is, it simply said: He had a credit card. In order to do a study of a covert operation, or a murder, or a simple murder: Who paid for the gasoline for Charlie Manson?
I know being locked up for twenty-two years you may have a strong sexual drive. It may be fun to have twenty or thirty chicks around you, but they still have to eat; they still have to have housing. Who was buying the machine guns, the walkie-talkies, and the dune buggies? He was on the edge of the Mohave Desert. They didn't steal all of it; none of them were hardly ever arrested for anything. They have parts of expensive cars. They had material things that are warfare things, and they never got arrested. And the gasoline.
Once in a while as punishment the girls would have to go out and take food out of garbage cans—that was their punishment for maybe not sleeping with Charlie or a guest or something like that. But for the most part none of them suffered any malnutrition; they had healthy babies; they seemed to be doing very well. They had guests at the ranch.
Where was this money coming from, from the day he left that jail until the Sharon Tate murders? Just like I follow the money from the James Ray case: from the day he left the Missouri jail he went right to a trailer the first night it was open. There was wine there; there was everything but the welcome sign, and maybe that was there. And within a day he had a car. Pretty soon he was on his way up to Canada and a resort motel and fancy place.
Where did the money come from the time Charlie Manson was in jail until the Sharon Tate murder?
Now we go to Charles Watson: This was a clean-cut boy who did these murders. He came from Texas. And the questions are: Where was he approached? How did he get into this case? Was it of his own volition?
Last week on the Monterey Peninsula there was an article in the paper that a boy was picked up as a hitch-hiker in Santa Cruz. He was thrown out of the car near the highlands, and we talked about that a littler bit on this show. He was almost killed. And the subject of the conversation was that one of the four men who just about killed him said, "I'm from the Manson Family in Texas." That caught my interest because something very big in the planning stage of this particular massacre took place in the state of Texas.
So I went to Community Hospital to discuss with this boy. This boy attended five years of College and the American system of education. He was about to go into the Peace Corp and go to the Philippines the next week. He was almost dead out at Community Hospital after just going down our beautiful coast and being picked up and roughed up by somebody who claimed to be from the Manson Family in Texas.
We don't know much—because it's never brought out at these trials—about the background of Charles Watson, except that he did appear with a beard and became part of the Manson Family. When Charles Manson was arrested, a law firm sent two lawyers who went to Texas to see this particular boy, Charles Watson. Judge David Brown said to the lawyers from Beverly Hills, California, "You take the next plane back to California. I will put you in jail for seventy-two hours or fine you if you don't get back to California." And the lawyers said, "Well, wait a minute, that's our client. We want to see him." The lawyer that wanted to see Charles Watson was named Mr. DeLoach. He called a press conference at a Dallas Hotel, and DeLoach said this at the press conference: "I came to see my client." Charles Watson had been in his office in Los Angeles, California thirty or forty times prior to the killing of Sharon Tate and the other six people in Los Angeles. DeLoach said his own background was that he was a Republican candidate for the State Assembly in 1964, and he was chairman for the Young Republicans. He belonged to a law firm on Santa Monica Boulevard in Los Angeles. At the jail to keep Mr. DeLoach from seeing Charles Watson were twenty Texas highway patrolmen and sheriff's deputies guarding him. And they fought the extradition for eight months.
When you're talking about conspiracies, Watson's defense has to go into every avenue to develop his claim that Charlie Manson masterminded him and programmed the group; that the hippie-youth-magic, Satan kind of thing, controlled him to use his knife to kill these people. Prior to meeting Manson, he was not involved in any kind of violence or altercation.
I have seen no record, publicly, that Mr. Watson had a traffic violation or any kind of problem. This twenty year-old boy needed an attorney from the Young Republican Committee forty times. I know what the expenses are to meet with any attorney, even for one hour. People use attorneys or public defenders if they have small altercations. But to go to a prominent law office of a man named Mr. DeLoach thirty to forty times prior to the time that you're going to kill seven people is worth investigating. And it's particularly worth investigating because the boy isn't even really considered a criminal or a murderer. When the trial for Charlie Manson took place this boy was in Texas, and they fought the extradition, and he later wouldn't be associated as part of that clan but as the robot or the product of that society.
The psychiatrist claims that when the decision was made to remove Charles Watson to California he became a catatonic, schizophrenic vegetable in a fetal position. Eight months in Texas he was doing just fine; he didn't lose a pound; he didn't lose a night's sleep; he was just having a good time. And when the decision came to bring him to California he became very sick. The prosecution claims that he was faking this; that when the psychiatrist looked the other way he would take a different posture and he would talk to people. The jury has been out for two days trying to decide if Charles Watson was guilty of those murders. They have to deliberate two days when it is common knowledge that he was in the homes and he did the murders. And Manson was never in the homes where those seven people were killed.
If that isn't a topsy-turvy, crazy world I don't know what it is.
How does your mind get effected to only associate the murder with one man, and let the other man get off the hook like this? I'm going to read headlines from this particular case, from just a few days in December, the way they were reading, coming off the press.
The first article I told you about was in October '69: Did Hate Kill Tate? That was the first opinion about who did it by Ed Butler.
In November there was a very objective article saying: The Grand Jury is to End the Probe of these 7 Deaths. That they don't know what to do.
Now, in December they began to describe Watson as a, in quotes, "man". They called him a man. And that Manson was the "hippie", that "guru Satan" that influenced the man. The man did the killings, and that hippie guru Satan influenced him.
They have on December 2nd: Nomadic hippies in the Tate murders.
December the 3rd: 3 Suspects in Tate Case Tied to Guru.
December the 4th: Accused Killers Live Nomad Life with Magnetic Guru.
December the 4th another paper said: Hypnotic Killers - Hippie Bands, They're Controlled by an Evil Genius.
Another headline: Father Became a Hippie, Looking for Sharon Tate Clues. Sharon Tate's father, dressed as a hippie looked around with drug addicts and vagabonds for four months. He was in Army Intelligence, and he was looking for the hippies who killed his daughter.
Another headline—These are headlines, not sentences from the articles: A Move to Indict God.
Another headline: The D.A. Asks Hippie-cult Indictment.
Another one: Inside the Desert-cult Hideout - Family Members Talk of Black Magic, Sex, Murder.
You see, the headline is putting all of these things in your heads, but it's not telling you, like the early articles, about the military type of killing that it was.
Another headline: Charles Manson - Nomadic Guru, Flirted with Crime.
Another one: Hippie Family Member Describes the Murder.
Another describes the murders as bizarre, twisted.
Cult Leader Plotted the War Between the Races – The cult leader.
"Mystic Hippie"... in quotes ...Used Dune Buggies Mounted with Machine Guns to Trigger a Negro vs. White War.
Another headline: Hippie Satan Clan is Indicted.
Talk of Cult Leader Arraigned in Slayings.
Another headline: Leader of a Hippie Cult Held in Isolated Cell.
Hippie Leader in Tate Case in Maximum Security. If they want to say the alleged murderer is in maximum security, he's the hippie leader in security; He's the hippie leader in an isolated cell.
Another article: The Hippie Mystique
Another one: The Love and Terror Cult, The Dark Edge of Hippie Life
Life magazine published a cover of Lee Harvey Oswald holding a gun. The shadows—the discrepancies of the murder are horrendous. They implant in your mind: This is the boy, This is the gun. None of it was true. Life magazine had a cover of James Earl Ray—This poverty-ridden, depressed prisoner who killed Martin Luther King. They said he was an orphan. None of that was true; Remember, his father was living; All of that was untrue.
Life magazine, December the 19th, has a large cover of Charlie Manson's eyes all blown up. Not in Texas. Not wanting to understand the American phenomena of hostility behind a blue suit and a white shirt and a neck tie and short hair—the killer. Not wanting to know how the Whitman boy is killed; how the college people kill. The brain children, one of the brightest children in this town—Charles Watson. Nobody's doing psychological, sociological studies on the actual killers. No. Life magazine has a cover of Manson. Nobody would sleep at night or give a kid on the road a ride if and when you saw Manson's eyes. Not a chance. They call it Love and Terror Cult.
Then Richard Nixon comes into the act. Headline: Here a man is guilty or indirectly of 8 months without reason. They hadn't even come to a verdict in the trial. Richard Nixon was in on the act. And John Mitchell got into the act.
Then—headline: Manson's Race Theory Rested on the Beatles. Then began a long attack on the Beatles.
Now those are the headlines of one month in December. That went on for one year. The consequence is in Carmel Valley or down to Big Sur: How many people would you pick up today? How many people do you put in your car? Or give a lift to? Or take into your home? Who would you trust? Who is disguised as a hippie with a knife that is going to come down on you?
I was in my neighbor's home across the street from me one day and we were talking about something, and a man from the police force in Seaside—a black man—had come there, and he didn't know who I was. We were rapping. He had been down at Lime Kiln Creek and he had lived with hippies for two weeks, and smoked their grass, and probably enjoyed the sex and the relationships and the vibe. And he was going home; he was on his way home to Seaside to clean and shave, and then go back down and make a bust on those people. He was going to take his beard off. I have seen it. I've lived with it. You can't give a lift because the agent provaceteurs, the covert government, is working. It's working in our city. And I can say it works on a national scale.
You read in the paper yesterday, maybe, how much of the Pentagon Papers is not being published and why it's being withheld. The large part of it is the covert relationship to Vietnam, the agents in disguise in Laos, or in Vietnam; our hidden war. The Manson thing is a hidden war. It's a hidden war against the youth, and it worked. If you take enough agents and give [kids] blades, or give them money, or give them the assurance that if they're arrested they'll get off, these kids will mess up.
Somebody came to my home a few weeks ago who had hitch-hiked across the country, and it was really scary. He went to some town in Idaho and a sheriff said, "Oh, did we have fun last night. We took this nigger-hippie and tied him up and dumped him in the river and got rid of him forever." And this is what I am hearing because I am talking about these things. When I talk I get feedback. People come to me and say, "Right on. This is what's happening."
So, I'm just showing you if you multiply one month of headlines and you sat with my collection you can see how the news media comes down on you.
Now, who were the lawyers involved in these cases? How do they overlap? Joseph Ball, from the Warren Commission, was in with Sue Atkins, the girl who's to turn state evidence.
A man named Lawrence Schiller made a record with Jack Ruby on January the 2nd, 1967, in which Ruby said there was no conspiracy to kill Oswald, and he was not a part of a conspiracy. It was made for Capital Records. I knew that Ruby would be dead within days because it was now recorded for history that there was no conspiracy. No one could see Jack Ruby except Capital Records. The only person who could see him was Lawrence Schiller.
January the 4th, two days later, Ruby was dead. The morning I read in my paper that Capital Records got into that hospital room and got this recording of Ruby's voice, I knew then that now Ruby could leave this earth. You see, it's all down for posterity.
This same Lawrence Schiller is the man who gave Sue Atkins $150,000 to turn the state's evidence to say that Manson masterminded the murders. She made $150,000. It was described as an unusual legal trick. Joseph Ball, who worked with the Warren Commission, was with parties involved in the Sharon Tate massacre. George Shibley, who worked with Sirhan—and McKissick was in his office—they worked with the Sirhan case. They were in on the Sharon Tate case. The lawyers overlap.
Lawrence Schiller wrote a book about the Sharon Tate massacres, and this is the way his book starts. He paid a huge amount to Sue Atkins to turn state's evidence. I'm going to read you what he had to say. I read you what Ed Butler, who worked with Oswald, said. Here is Schiller, he said:
Where did it all start?...we can see them going to San Francisco with flowers in their hair...the "flower children"... The Haight-Ashbury hippie... linked together in the history of America's 1960's.
I'm going to stop the quote now to say this is where we started this hour. I began in '67 with those flower children and started a file in my filing system on the flower children, knowing that within two to three years everything would break down on their heads. Now, it's interesting that Lawrence Schiller begins his book:
Where did it all start?...We see them on the road.
He said:
...a movement which sprang from multiple revolutions of the sixties, the new morality, the revolt of the youth. The middle-class watched, relieved, happy to be spectators.
When the Sharon Tate murders happened, he says it was because two out-groups fell upon the other. The people that were making it with their loose sex (he implies) and the drugs. It was two out-groups hitting at each other.
Now he goes into:
Young people had always followed pretty much the precepts of their forbearers until the 1960's came...But mass communication changed our youth. They could travel, they had experiences, information, money...How could young people thus inundated with the facts of life believe the puritan ethic.
I'm going to digress again; stop the quote. We talked about Greece. I was watching Greece for two years. I was watching the hippies. Here is Lawrence Schiller in on the thick of everything, telling you just where I was two years earlier watching how it was going to come down. Now we're getting back to his quotations:
The young people, having rejected the ethics, rejected the laws which were based upon them. They were ripe for new liberation...
And then he perverts the whole thing and says when Charlie Manson came along, he was the chemical messiah. And the essence of their lives were anti-establishment. They had thrown down the puritan ethics and the laws.
He implies they could become lawless and amoral and throw around their sex and their bodies, and they latched on to what he calls the "chemical messiah."
Now who bought the LSD and the chemicals? Did our government pay Charlie's way? His bus? His gas? Was he a chemical messiah, or was he designed out of Texas? Or Mussel Sholes, Alabama, where everything else is designed, and the lawyers are sent? Who designed Charlie Manson? Lawrence Schiller is telling you he's a chemical messiah. I'm saying somebody bought his chemistry; he didn't; It wasn't all handed to him. The government brought it to him and put on his costume; his leather coat and his guitar, and said, "Charlie, get on the road."
Schiller says Manson drifted into the hippie scene. And he admits he's another ex-con seeking protective coloration from the hippies. I claim he was an ex-con who went into the hippie scene to pick up the jargon, to do a job like the mafia does a job like we do in Vietnam, like a soldier goes out to kill. We send boys out to Fort Ord for six weeks training, chanting: "Kill the commies!" They pick up the jargon of the jungle because they're gonna be in the jungle. They didn't arrive that way, we teach them the jargon. Charlie Manson was taught because he was going to pretend to be a hippie. He hated being called a hippie—the book mentions it; He disliked being called a hippie.
So they put him in a beat up school bus and they called it the Manson Family and they headed south. Manson learned to play the guitar, to sing, and write music. That was his last occupation. This is what he was trained for in the federal prison. Lawrence Schiller tells you in a federal prison they rehabilitate you to go out on the street. They bought Charlie a guitar. He had an inkling for music, and he was a natural. He's probably horny as hell and wanting to get on the road anyway. He had all this hostility. He said, "I did it because I wanted to make it look like the blacks were doing it. I want to speed up a race war." He's violently anti-black. And he could sing a song and carry a tune. He had the natural hatred. And he loved the chicks. He was just perfect for the role; he was just ripe for it.
Schiller went on that his livelihood, when they let him out of prison, was that he was going to be a musician. Lawrence Schiller says:
...here was Charles Manson, a year out of prison, mingling with Hollywood stars in 1968... The Manson Family was, somehow, making it with the Establishment...And Manson was going to some of Hollywood's plushest parties.
Lawrence Schiller is telling you that a year later Charlie is right in there with the biggest people of all. That's pretty interesting considering the lawyer that he saw before he got out of Treasure Island, and the lawyer that Tex Watson is seeing before these crimes are committed. These boys were wined and dined in the music scene, in the art scene, by certain people before the massacres took place.
Lawrence Schiller says:
...in the true sense of the word, the Manson Family weren't hippies... Manson didn't like being called a hippie. The hippies don't like it either.
Well, I guarantee Lawrence Schiller that the hippies didn't like it either. He knows they didn't. He said the hippies didn't like it. I know they didn't. It ended everything that was really good that was coming down. And then he concludes the introduction to his book on Sharon Tate saying:
It was a strange Satanic whim that sent those people into Benedict Canyon.
And I claim it was more that a satanic whim, that the book Mr. Kaiser puts out in Oakland, and advertises in Esquire magazine, and the use of this word Satan and witchcraft is a conceived program that disguises the covert government to come down on this generation. And it has succeeded. Nobody really feels safe in the area or around the country. The effect that they wanted has happened, you see.
I gave just a sentence from an article last week. I'm going back to conclude with a few remarks of Marshal Singer. It was an article that was printed in April, 1970:
Observations on the Sharon Tate massacre and Charlie Manson
He says:
Charlie Manson is certainly an enigmatic. Is he a victim or a monster? He's equal parts of Charlie Chaplan and Jack the Ripper. He had been arrested thirty-seven times in his thirty-five years.
And Manson said:
I'll tell you I'm not from your society. I've spent most of my life in a world of bars and solitary confinement. And my philosophy comes from underneath the boots and the sticks and the clubs that they beat people with, who come from the wrong side of the tracks. People like me are society's scapegoats.
And this is James Ray, the same thing: society's scapegoats.
Jack Ruby is society's scapegoat. He can be used. He's Jewish. He's poor. He's kicked around by the anti-Semetics, the rich oil people. He's used when they want. He's stepped on when they want. He is just a pushed-around kid who wanted to make it in this world and be recognized as just what he is. And always carrying this heavy load of anti-Semitism, an underdog, playing a game with the military and the mafia and the oil people for approval and affection: "If I do your work will you love me now?" The minute he shot Oswald, Jack Ruby said, "I wanted to prove to them that I had guts." And he took the challenge.
And Manson is saying: "People like me are society's scapegoats."
The article by Marshall Singer goes on to say that Lawrence Schiller got the confession of this Atkins girl. She was twenty-one, pretty, and she would say that she was victimized by Manson. She had to hold Sharon Tate in her arms so Charles 'Tex' Watson could stab this particular female who was pregnant, and all the other people.
Manson had a lot of hostility. He tells you he was kicked around. His plans were to assemble these dune buggies and have an armada against the pigs, against the black people, against the cops; he would kill cops. He'd been arrested all these times. He'd been in isolation. He would kill them, but he would make it look like blacks did it. He would be getting even with blacks and cops at the same time. He hoped to wipe out both groups that he hated so much.
The article does say that in the early sixties we had our own magical potions, and we had a handsome young president who held out promises. And when he was killed a lot of the dreams went away. When people like Manson break in with us it is a reality too complex and to banal to understand.
In one hour it's hard for me to really rap up the complexity of this because each week we talk about the covert government, the overthrow, change in the economic system. This is what the Sharon Tate massacre is about. I hope that in this one brief hour you can understand how minds all over the world can be effected by killing just seven people, and perverting the news media everyday and every hour to keep this image going. The truth of the murders is different than what the news is saying.
GLORIA: Thank you, Mae. I don't see how you got it in one hour, but you seem to do it. Thank you.
MAE: Okay.
(End)

Home

Here We Go Again with the 'Lone Shooter' Story

2011-12-09T11:51:00.005-06:00

Don't know about you, but I can't stomach much more of the so called 'free press'.

The whole 'lone shooter' story is beyond fabrication; it is a creation of those those who pull the strings.

Read some very interesting quotes on mind control killings here.

Now for the latest 'news'...

Virginia Tech shooting: Gunman was not a student, acted alone

The gunman in the Virginia Tech shooting was not a student, had no apparent connection to the university and is believed to have acted alone when he shot a campus police officer, authorities said Friday morning.

A news conference held Friday morning by school and law-enforcement officials raised more questions than it answered. Authorities said they were continuing to piece together a motive in the deadly shooting of Officer Deriek W. Crouse that had locked down a stunned campus less than 24 hours earlier.

"That's very much the fundamental part of the investigation right now. ... [Why] this man approached Officer Crouse and took his life," said Corinne Geller, a spokeswoman for the Virginia State Police. "At this point we have nothing to connect him to the Virginia Tech campus or school."

PHOTOS: Virginia Tech shooting

She also said there the investigation hasn't turned up anything to suggest a link between the gunman and the officer.

Authorities would not release personal details about the gunman, who was not carrying identification when he was found, pending the completion of an autopsy, a positive identification, and notification of next of kin.

Geller said the shooter used a handgun, but she would not discuss its caliber or whether the gunman had the legal right to carry it within the state. She said the department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms was investigating the gun's history, including whether it had been used in any other crimes.

The shooting unfolded about 12:15 p.m. Thursday when Crouse -- an Army veteran and married father of five -- stopped a car on campus. Witnesses reported that the gunman walked up to Crouse and opened fire, seemingly without provocation. The gunman then fled.

The shooting triggered a campuswide lockdown while several state and federal agencies launched a manhunt.
Minutes later, a second body was found about a quarter-mile away, leading some to fear another campus rampage could be underway. In the 2007, 33 were killed in the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history.
It would turn out, however, that the second body was that of the gunman. Ballistic and other evidence showed he died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, authorities said.

ALSO:
Virginia Tech shooting leaves two dead
Virginia Tech fatal shooting revives fears from 2007 massacre
Virginia Tech shooting: 2007 rampage led to safety changes nationwide

-- Rene Lynch

twitter.com / renelynch

Photo: Corinne Geller of the Virginia State Police at a news conference Friday. Credit: Chris Keane / Reuters

Meet Mae Brussell (1922-1988)

2011-12-08T22:15:00.006-06:00

In this Aug 25, 1971 radio program, Mae talks about her analysis of the Warren Commission hearings.

WEBSITES
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/mblinks.htm

http://maebrussell.com/

http://www.whale.to/b/brussell.html

DECEMBER 13, 2011 UPDATE

Show #16 (October 13, 1971) Show #22 (November 24, 1971) Show #365 (December 1, 1978) Show #482 (March 1, 1981) Show #495 (May 31, 1981) Show #537 side 2 (March 21, 1982) Show #787 (January 5, 1987)

The Painful Truth

2011-12-05T20:15:00.002-06:00

Testimony of Aram

2011-12-05T05:10:00.000-06:00

More Scientology Madness

2011-11-30T20:42:00.007-06:00

Recent Article: Scientology's Cruise Ship as Prison: The Voice Interviews Valeska Paris

Quote of another former member:
"I spent twelve years in Scientology. I progressed to the "secret upper levels" of Scientology which are chiefly involved with the exorcism of demons. I didn't realize when I got into Scientology that I would be involved in demonic and satanic practices when I got onto these upper levels. Nor was it told to me that L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, was a practicing Satanist, and that this was his religion, and the "religion" behind Scientology. The facts are carefully concealed from the beginning Scientologist." Hollywood, Satanism, Scientology and Suicide

More:
http://www.whale.to/b/scientology.html

VIDEOS

John Hinckley is in the News Again

2011-11-30T14:26:00.014-06:00

In 1982, John Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity of shooting then President Ronald Reagan.

Today, Hinckley is in the news as he seeks more freedom from his current residence, a D.C. psychiatric hospital.“This man is not dangerous,” said Mr Hinckley's attorney Barry Wm. Levine.

But what about John Hinckley?

Some think he was/is a victim of some type of mk-ultra mind control:

"Another mind-controlled victim who has been unfairly victimized is John Hinckley, the young man who wounded President Reagan. Hinckley was programmed in Lexington by an aide to a British Intelligence psychiatrist, who had previously programmed Son-of -Sam satanic cultist Berkovitz at a Westchester, N.Y. mind-control facility. Like Patrick Purdy, who massacred seven Vietnamese children in a Stockton, California schoolyard, Hinckley had associated with neo-Nazis and had been prescribed mood-altering neuroleptic pharmaceuticals."

Mind Controlled Killers: What happened at Columbine High School? Was O.J. Simpson innocent? In Defense of Buford Furrow Jr.! by Brian Desborough

The following article gives a bit more information on the Hinckley family...

This article comes from
http://tomflocco.com/

HINCKLEY AND BUSH FAMILIES WERE CLOSE FRIENDS
December 22, 2003

HINCKLEY AND BUSH FAMILIES WERE CLOSE FRIENDS

by Connie Cook Smith
(printed with permission)
http://www.conniescomments.blogspot.com

Everyone knows who John Hinckley, Jr. is. This youngest Hinckley son is now being permitted unsupervised visits within the Washington, DC metropolitan area--away from his mental facility, after nearly killing President Reagan in 1981. But a much more interesting subject is, who is John Hinckley, Sr.?

In 1980, Hinckley Sr. was a Texas oilman who, the records show, strove mightily to get fellow Texas oilman George H.W. Bush the Republican nomination for president. The Bushes and the Hinckleys were frequent dinner companions.

But far beyond their social connection, neither Bush nor Hinckley wanted Ronald Reagan to become president, because Reagan was opposed to tax breaks for the oil industry to which Bush, Hinckley and other Texans were highly dependent.

The effort to make Bush Sr. president in 1980 failed; but he and his friend and backer Hinckley Sr. got the next best thing – the "heartbeat away from the presidency" office of Vice-President of the United States.

A couple months later, Hinckley Jr. shot Reagan, and Bush Sr. very nearly did become president at that time, after all. Curiously, only one time was it announced on the news about the connections between the Bush and Hinckley families: An almost bewildered John Chancellor on NBC Nightly News reported "the bizarre coincidence" that Vice President Bush's son, Neil, and Scott Hinckley had dinner plans for March 31, 1981 -- now cancelled, of course. [But even Chancellor failed to mention the close friendship between the the assassin's father and Vice President Bush--let alone the rest of the corporate media.]

Reports indicate that the Bush family strove mightily to keep this information from the American people. And some reports list this incredible "coincidence" -- directly linked to the assassination attempt of President Reagan -- as one of the most spiked stories of the last century.

In other words, the brother of the shooter and the son of the vice-president (and their wives) had a dinner date for the day after the shooting. But it really wasn’t such "a bizarre coincidence." Those two families were very close; but the press never focused on that critical fact as it should have. If Reagan had died, the oilmen’s interests would have been served.

Some people think that Hinckley Jr. was mind-controlled, CIA-style, to shoot Reagan. George Bush Sr. was head of the CIA a few years before. Others think that young Hinckley wanted to please his dad and get Bush, his dad’s candidate and close friend, into the presidency for him after all.

Interestingly, legal experts note that the crime occurred in Washington, D.C., the only venue in the United States at that time which recognized an insanity defense. If the kid committed the crime in D.C., he would never serve hard time? Well, coincidentally, that's where he committed it.

A very good read on the Hinckley-Bush connections is a book that came out about 20 years ago, entitled, "The Afternoon of March 30." It was published as a novel in order to protect the author. This book is now more relevant than ever, and it can be obtained at:
http://www.nathanielblumberg.com/bush.htm.

But there’s another coincidence to mention. In January of 1963, President John F. Kennedy announced his plan to cut the tax breaks for the oil industry. Oilmen H.L. Hunt, George H.W. Bush (head of Zapata Petroleum), and others were no doubt enraged. What a curious twist of fate that Kennedy was shot in Texas later that same year.

In the 1990's, LBJ’s now-undisputed mistress Madeleine Brown announced that LBJ told her that Kennedy was murdered "by the oil people, and aspects of the CIA."

And gosh, one more coincidence – we now have another Bush, the oilman’s son, becoming U.S. President in a very quirky election. And many individuals believe he gave the American people completely phony reasons for invading Iraq-- one of the most oil-rich nations in the Middle East.

Hmm....

[ Sidebar: Many other significant facts concerning the Bush and Hinckley families have remained unexplored and unexplained, in addition to other matters related to the assassination attempt detailed in Blumberg's book which is found at:
http://www.nathanielblumberg.com/bush.htm :

1. Neil Bush, a landman for Amoco Oil, told Denver reporters he had met Scott Hinckley at a surprise party at the Bush home January 23, 1981 [Nine weeks before Hinckley's brother John Jr. attempted to assassinate President Reagan--which would have elevated Bush Sr. to the presidency], and approximately three weeks after the U.S. Department of Energy had begun what was termed a "routine audit" of the books of the Vanderbilt Energy Corporation, the Hinckley oil company. In an incredible coincidence, on the morning of March 30 [the day of the Reagan assassination attempt by John Hinckley, Jr.], three representatives of the U.S. Department of Energy told Scott Hinckley, John Hinckley Jr.'s older brother and Vanderbilt's vice president of operations, that auditors had uncovered evidence of pricing violations on crude oil sold by the company from 1977 through 1980. The auditors announced that the federal government was considering a penalty of two million dollars. [This, on the same day that his brother John--the youngest son of Vice President Bush's close friend--attempted the assassination!] Scott Hinckley reportedly requested "several hours to come up with an explanation" of the serious overcharges. The meeting ended a little more than an hour before John Hinckly Jr. shot President Reagan.

2. Excerpts from an interview by Theresa Walla, United Press International, March 9, 1985: Journalism professor Nathaniel Blumberg was so disturbed about the investigation into the attempted assassination of President Reagan that he turned his suspicions into a 377-page novel.

In The Afternoon of March 30 , Blumberg blends fact and fiction in looking at the unreported "connections" between Hinckley's family and that of Vice President George Bush, the man who came within a heartbeat of the presidency of the United States.

"What I'm really after is the case to be officially reopened," said the Rhodes scholar and former dean of the University of Montana journalism school. "If they can answer all the questions satisfactorily, I'll be delighted," he said in an interview. "In truth, I don't think all the questions can be answered without opening up a whole new can of worms."

Blumberg's unease is now focused on the indifference shown to what he calls "the story behind the story." Bush, he said, has questions to answer in connection with the attempt. So do the FBI and the judge who presided over Hinckley's trial, according to Blumberg.

"I'm not saying there was a conspiracy to assassinate Reagan," Blumberg emphasized. "I'm saying there was a conspiracy to keep significant information from the public that it has a right to know."

Blumberg asks his readers to consider his contentions that journalists were fed a barely believable story full of inconsistencies. A long-time media critic, he decided the example warranted more than a critique of press performance in a crisis. Such efforts, he said, usually "go out there and die." Instead, he chose to weave his questions into a novel so it would reach a broader audience and allow him to probe problems in society and corruption in government, as well as maladies of the U.S. press.

His book chronicles the adventures of a fictitious Montana newsman who follows the information trail deserted by the national media. His documentation is put in the form of an article the fictitious hero is writing. Blumberg published the book on his own Wood FIRE Ashes Press to retain total control over the quality.

"Have you ever heard an author say what a great job his publisher did with a book?" he asks. But, without a commercial advertising campaign, he's had to market the book in an "organic, straightforward fashion." Blumberg says he mails out several copies of the novel each week and expects it to "stay alive as long as people continue to care about justice." ]

http://www.conniescomments.blogspot.com

(submitted/posted by Connie Cook Smith)

( Further Reading )

Links For The Reagan Assassination
And The Bush And Hinckley Families:

http://www.Padrak.com/alt/BUSHBOOK_7.html
THE ATTEMPTED COUP D'ETAT OF MARCH 30, 1981---Incredible Info.

http://John-Lennon.net

http://www.GeorgeWalkerBush.net

http://www.KMF.org/williams/bushbook.html

Thanks to Mark Elsis ( Lovearth.net ) for above
additional research links.

MORE LINKS AND RESEARCH ON REAGAN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT:

[ Special thanks to Virginia Raines ( rainesco@earthlink.net ) for yet more intriguing information and incredible links concerning Bush-Hinckley, evidence that Hinckley did not carry out the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan. At the least, there has been much left out and covered up. And anyone who has the least bit of interest in getting to the TRUTH of 9-11 should take note that incredible evidence and even strikingly curious "coincidences" get swept under the rug in key historical cases such as this one. Moreover, one only needs to examine the useless 9-11 Commission which refuses to publicly examine officials in charge on the day of the attack UNDER OATH as an example of how to cover up the largest mass murder in U.S. history. Here is Virginia Raines' research and look at further evidence in the Reagan assassination attempt:

There are further questions -- particularly the World Vision connection. Here are a few bits to add to the query. Please share this information with Connie or anyone else who has doubts about the official story of the attempt on Reagan's life.

Reagan was blackmailed into taking on Bush as VP. Within just a few months, Bush Sr. was essentially co-president (or more).

"Bush is functioning much like a co-president. George is involved in all the national security stuff because of his special background as CIA director." -- White House press secretary James Brady, March 1981 Chapter XVII - 'The Attempted Coup D'Etat of March 30, 1981' 'George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography' by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin.

Video Evidence: Did Hinckley Really Shoot Reagan?

http://www.noveltynet.org/content/paranormal/www.parascope.com/mx/articles/hinckley.htm

[[Note that Reagan didn't think he was hit by a bullet at all -- and that leaves another question about just what happened; this is snipped from another page of the Tarpley and Chaitkin book]]

"Only the sixth and last bullet found Reagan, striking his armpit and tunneling into his chest. The president felt a sharp pain but thought it was only from Parr pushing him so hard. He looked at Parr and made a feeble joke: 'You sonofabitch, you broke my rib' just as the limousine raced away from the scene."

Namebase: (see social network diagram by clicking link)
http://www.namebase.org/main4/World-Vision.html

[[snipped from an intenet list -- this portion written by Brian Downing Quig]]

Of course there was a connection to Bush. The information below is very uninformed. At the time John Hinkley "shot" Reagan Hinkley's brother was having dinner with one of the Bush sons. Hinkley's father was a close friend of Bush senior and the number 2 man in a CIA front called WORLD VISION SOCIETY. The WORLD VISION SOCIETY purported to feed the world's hungry while all along their purpose was to manage refugee camps from which to recruit assassins. Today the WORLD VISION SOCIETY manages the refugee camp at the old Jones Town location where the CIA's Hmong mercenaries now are.

Chapman, the assassin of John Lennon, worked at a WORLD VISION SOCIETY managed refugee camp for the Cuban boat people at Fort Chaffee with the remnents of ALPHA 66. As Lennon was shot, president elect Reagan and his chosen CIA Director Bill Casey clinked champaign glasses a few blocks away in a New York City hotel. That is how they set the tenor of their administration.

And remember, the doctors said they removed a disc from Reagan--not a bullet. Barbara Honegger thinks Brady was the intended victim because of what he knew about the deal Reagan cut with the Iranians to delay the hostage release.

http://www.babelmagazine.com/issue82/jonestown.html:

Jonestown, CIA, World Vision, Hinckley and Bush from Internet posting:

One of the strangest CIA connections to Jonestown was World Vision, an evangelical order which often fronts for the CIA. They performed espionage work for the CIA in Southeast Asia while Operation Phoenix (the murderous project that left 40,000 people dead) was in full effect. In Honduras, they maintained a presence at CIA contra recruiting camps in the war against the Sandinistas. In Lebanon, the fascist Phalange butchered Palestinians at World Vision's camp. In Cuba, their refugee camps hosted numerous members of the anti-Castro terrorist group Alpha 66 of Bay of Pigs fame.

After the Guyana massacre, World Vision developed a scheme to repopulate Jonestown with CIA-linked mercenaries from Laos. Laos, of course, was where the CIA was running its "secret war" during Vietnam, which for the most part was a smokescreen for a widespread opium trafficking operation.

One particularly important World Vision official was John Hinckley, Sr., an oil man, reputed CIA officer, and friend of George Bush. You may have heard of his son.

Less than four months before Hinckley Jr. became known as Jodie Foster's biggest fan, another member of the World Vision order, Mark Chapman, gunned down John Lennon in what may have been a practice run for the bigger hit on President Reagan. One of the policemen who found him was convinced that he was a mind-controlled assassin. Chapman was clutching a copy of the novel "Catcher in the Rye," which was also owned by John Hinckley Jr. (The book was written by J.D. Salinger, who worked in military intelligence with Henry Kissinger during World War II.) Before going to trial, Chapman pleaded guilty after a voice in his head (which he attributed to God) commanded him to do so.

Considering the history of World Vision and what went on previously in Guyana, it is possible that the real purpose behind repopulating Jonestown was to create another breeding ground for brainwashed zombies like Chapman and Hinckley. Near Jonestown there was a place called Hilltown, a compound of 8,000 blacks that followed cult leader Rabbi David Hill, who held his flock with an iron fist. Hill had so much power that he was referred to as the "vice prime minister" of Guyana. There was also another place in Guyana called "Johnstown," as well as similar operations in the Philippines and Chile. It appears that Jonestown (and World Vision's later attempt) is hardly the exception to the rule of using obscure locations in Third World nations as laboratories for covert cult operations.

[[The "Cleon" mentioned here would be Cleon Skousen, I think. Gritz isn't always the best source for information, but what he says here can be found in other reports as well.]]

http://www.ez-websites.com/grudge/bo.htm

Excerpts from a talk given by Lt. Col. "Bo" Gritz in Mesa, Arizona on April 4, 1992:

In Mesa, I met with him [Cleon Skaas(?)] and I said, "Why in the world did Ronald Reagan sell us down the tube by taking George Bush as his running mate?" And I really didn't know that Cleon knew Ronald Reagan rather well. But he told me: He said, "Bo, George Bush was Ronald Reagan's greatest opponent," (if you'll remember, back in the 1980 elections), "and Ronald Reagan said he would never have him. Then, Ronald Reagan was invited to New York to go see Rockefeller. When he saw Rockefeller, he was told, 'If you do not take my head of the Trilateral Commission'" (remember, the Council on Foreign Relations, George Bush) "'as your running mate, the only way you'll see the inside of the White House is as a tourist.'"

Two months after he was inaugurated, two months is all that Ronald Reagan lasted. March 30th, 1981, two months after his inauguration in January of 1981, he was shot -- was he not? And the news said that he was shot by John Hinckley, Jr., and that John Hinckley, Jr., was some kind of a Jodie Foster freak. And that he came out of nowhere, and that he shot Brady in the head, and he shot a policeman in the neck, and he shot a Secret Service man and blew him back over the vehicle, and he shot Ronald Reagan. Right?

Well, remember the hardware. That's why I gave you a little introduction... I did. [Gritz had talked earlier about some sophisticated "tools of the trade."] Soon as I see this stuff I begin to wonder, because I've been a part of these kinds of operations. Let's just go back and review. It's all in the book [*Called to Serve*(?)], and so, very quickly I'll run down through you.

When Brady was shot, no question. Here we've got John Hinckley, Jr., Oh, by the way, is John Hinckley, Jr., just some kind of a "weirdo?" Isn't it strange that John Hinckley, Sr., is the owner of Vanderbilt Oil? And, of course, George Bush is the owner of Zapata Oil. Was it a coincidence, then, that John Hinckley, Sr., and George Bush are neighbors *for years* in Houston, Texas, working together? Is it any coincidence that John Hinckley, Sr., when you go back through the FEC, the Federal Election Commission, his own record of giving maximum donations every year to Mr. Bush even when he started running for Congress. Well now, does that make his son, John Hinckley, Jr., seem a little bit less of a coincidence? I think it does. Here's why:

When the President was shot, if you'll remember, he was pushed into the car by a man named Jerry Parr(sp?) that was his Secret Service guard. Jerry Parr fell on top of him and, I just saw in the *Reader's Digest* where Jerry Parr was telling his "valiant story." And the limousine tore off, didn't it? Now it was *five minutes later* that the ambulance arrived and they put the Secret Service man, the Washington, D.C. policeman, and Brady in the ambulance and *it* roared off. Using normal time-rate/distance, who should have arrived at George Washington University Hospital first? The President should have. Well, who did? You know it's a trick question. The ambulance arrived 15 minutes before the President. When asked, "What happened?" the Secret Service simply responded, "We got lost."

The Secret Service does not get lost in Washington, D.C. They don't get lost in most places of the world. And so, now the investigation starts to get a little interesting. When they take Ronald Reagan in, they can see that he... matter of fact, his heart almost stopped. And he is convulsing; there's blood on his lips. They know he's hurt... seriously. But they can find no wounds. They X-ray him *3 times* and can find nothing.

Finally, a nurse notices a tiny entrance wound right at the seventh rib, underneath the armpit. And a doctor takes a probe, and by... very carefully, because they couldn't see it on X-ray, the doctor is able to extract what he said was a planchet, thinner than a dime, that was one-quarter inch from Ronald Reagan's aorta.

Now, Ronald Reagan says... as a matter of fact, let me just see if I can just read it to you... best what Ronnie says. I've got all this in the book... This came right out of a newspaper:

I knew I had been hurt, but I thought that I'd been hurt by the Secret Service man landing on me in the car. As it was, I must say it was the most paralyzing pain. I've described it as if someone hit you with a hammer. But the sensation, it seemed to me, came after I was in the car and so I thought that maybe his gun or something had broken a rib. I set up on the seat, and the pain wouldn't go away -- and suddenly, I found I was coughing up blood. Now you see, to almost anyone else you might say, "Well, just some kind of a fluke." But I'm a skeptic. Because I know how these things have happened ever since they "took out" John Fitzgerald Kennedy. I think maybe JFK was the last honest President that we had... ]

--- end ---

John Hinckley, Jr. – Manchurian Candidate For Who?

Sirhan Says He Was Victim of Mind Control

2011-11-28T18:17:00.004-06:00

RFK assassin Sirhan Sirhan alleges conspiracy theory, seeks release from prison

By Eric Pfeiffer
11/28/11
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/rfk-assassin-sirhan-sirhan-alleges-conspiracy-theory-seeks-160638113.html

Sirhan Sirhan, after being arrested for the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.

Attorneys for Sirhan Sirhan, the man who assassinated Robert Kennedy in 1968, have asked that he be released from prison, alleging that he was a victim of "mind-control" and never actually shot Kennedy.

Less than a week after the anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Sirhan's lawyers have presented their own Kennedy conspiracy theory, alleging that in Sirhan's 1969 trial the court ignored evidence that there were actually two shooters in RFK's assassination. Sirhan's legal team is also arguing that the revolver found on Sirhan was not responsible for the gunshots that killed Kennedy.

"Though the practice of hypno programming/mind control is hardly new, the public has been shielded from the darker side of the practice," Sirhan's court filings say. "The average person is unaware that hypnosis can and is used to induct antisocial conduct in humans."

Attorneys William F. Pepper and Laurie D. Dusek argue that Sirhan at least deserves a new trial, alleging that the original 1969 proceeding were marred by fraud when the court allowed a substitute bullet to be used in place of the real bullet removed from Kennedy's neck.

In addition, Sirhan's attorneys say recently discovered audio recordings provide evidence that as many as thirteen gun shots were fired at the time of Kennedy's assassination assassinated. As CNN explains, the details get even stranger from there:

The attorneys further assert that Sirhan was hypno-programmed to be a diversion for the real assassin and allege that Sirhan would be easily blamed for the assassination because he is an Arab. Sirhan, 67, is a Christian Palestinian born in Jerusalem whose parents brought him and his siblings to America in the 1950s.
Sirhan "was an involuntary participant in the crimes being committed because he was subjected to sophisticated hypno programming and memory implantation techniques which rendered him unable to consciously control his thoughts and actions at the time the crimes were being committed," court papers said.

The California attorney general's office has so far declined to comment on Sirhan's court filings.

Sirhan Sirhan has long claimed that he cannot remember the actual assassination. Harvard Medical School hypno-programming expert Daniel Brown recently worked with Sirhan, claiming to successfully help him remember the assassination for the first time. Brown says Sirhan claims that due to "mind control," Sirhan believed he was at a gun range shooting at circular targets.

Pepper and Dusek also represented Sirhan during his recent unsuccessful attempt to win parole from Pleasant Valley state Prison in Coalinga, California, where he is currently serving a life sentence.

Why Did Christians Ban Christmas in 1647?

2011-11-20T10:42:00.002-06:00

LINK: http://missionarytoamerica.wordpress.com/articles/when-christians-banned-christmas/

When Christians Banned Christmas

Although many may say that Christmas is for Christians, history shows that instead of embracing the “holiday,” Christians throughout the years have stood against it. Even some of the very men that founded America fought to outlaw its observance.

In the 1640’s, the English Parliament discussed enacting a ban on Christmas because they believed that it was directly contrary to Christianity. One of the main reasons that the Puritans believed this was because the holiday was a mixture of “pagan revelry” and Catholic mandates. Being strongly against the ways of Catholicism, many Puritans forbade the attendance of mass in England, from which the name “Christmas” was derived.

In 1647, parliament not only passed a law banning Christmas, but also Easter, Whitsun and all of the special “saints” days instituted by the Catholic church.

When the Puritans came to America, they carried with them a desire to worship God in spirit and in truth, and to reject the ways of England. They continued to take a stand against the mandates of the Vatican, which they viewed as idolatrous. Additionally, they despised the way that many celebrated the Vatican-mandated holiday of Christmas by indulging in all sorts of drinking and gluttonous feasting. The Puritans believed these acts blasphemed the name of Christ.

In 1656, Hezekiah Woodward distributed a pamphlet about Christmas, which stated:
”Christ-Mass Day, the old Heathens Feasting Day, in honor to Saturn their Idol-God, the Papists Massing Day, the Profane Man’s Ranting Day, the Superstitious Man’s Idol Day, The Multitudes Idle Day, Satan’s – that Adversary’s – Working Day. Taking to heart the heathenish customs, Popish superstitions, ranting fashions, fearful provocations, horrible abominations, committed against the Lord, and His Christ, on that day and days following …”

On May 11, 1659, the Massachusetts Bay Colony legislature passed a law banning any observance of Christ’s mass, declaring:
“For preventing disorders arising in several places within this jurisdiction, by reason of some still observing such festivals as were superstitiously kept in other countries, to the great dishonor of God & offence of others, it is therefore ordered … that whosoever shall be found observing any such day as Christmas or the like, either by for-bearing of labor, feasting, or any other way, upon any such account as aforesaid, every such person so offending shall pay for every such offence five shillings, as a fine to the county.”

It is said that some, however, continued to celebrate the holiday in secret, and looked for priests who held mass services despite the prohibition against doing so.

While the law against Christmas was repealed in 1681 by English-appointed governor Sir Edmund Andres in an attempt to make the laws of the colony like those of Charles II in England ─ from whence the Puritans had departed ─ many individuals continued to stand against its observance. When Boston’s first Episcopal Church, King’s Chapel, began to hold services in commemoration of the holiday, not everyone attended. Judge Samuel Sewall wrote in his journal in 1697: “[My son] tells me that though most of the boys went to the church, yet he went not.”

Even though some continued to celebrate Christmas through the years, the Puritans believed that doing so demonstrated one’s support of the Roman Catholic Church, which they disdained. They were set against ecumenicalism, both regarding the traditions of Rome and the traditions of the land that they fought to be free from: England.
Sources:

“Puritans,” Christmas-celebrations.org
“The Puritan Ban on Christmas,” Timetravel-britain.com
“When Christmas was Banned in Boston” , AmericanHeritage.com

Comments »

on December 16, 2010 at 7:04 pm | Reply Dena

Great article
on December 17, 2010 at 7:38 pm | Reply Gary D Johnson
This is an excellent and truth based article.
on December 20, 2010 at 3:08 am | Reply Tom
Great work!
on November 13, 2011 at 4:54 pm | Reply Rocio Quintero
Good article
on November 13, 2011 at 7:16 pm | Reply Luz Rodriguez
so full of truth!
on November 14, 2011 at 5:09 pm | Reply Linag
eye opener!!! The truth shall set the captives free!!!!
on November 14, 2011 at 8:59 pm | Reply Tricia O'Connor
December 25th is a leftover from pagan days, it is probable that He was born during the feast of tablernacles (Sukkot) which is in September or October.
Christmas is the division line between those who serve the True and Living God and the god of mamon. Sad that this day is set aside to recall the humble beginnings of the Greatest King who ever lived…marked with so much fakery and sin….also sad that some families never have time to get together other than on this day.
Christmas is every day: He is alive in my heart and each day adds new mercies every morning.
on November 16, 2011 at 10:05 am | Reply Carlos Perdomo (@7ElCantante7)
I love it when the remnant stands firm against anything that blasphemes God.
on November 16, 2011 at 12:39 pm | Reply Charles
Well said!
on November 16, 2011 at 7:51 pm | Reply Jessica Evrist
yes, division line… when i look for a church.. i ask.. do they have a christmas tree on their altar??? Then i know that they have jezebel there… 1 corin 11;18 & 19, rev 2:20
on November 17, 2011 at 11:47 pm | Reply Linda Uchi G
an eye-opener
on November 20, 2011 at 12:05 am | Reply Alexandra
Love this article! I find it SO ironic that professing Christians are trying to defend a pagan holiday! Christmas, as I understand, wasn’t made a national holiday until around 1870.

"Where Did the Towers Go?" Author Dr Judy Wood Interviewed in UK

2011-11-19T21:36:00.003-06:00

Dr Judy Wood interviewed on One Step Beyond TV show with Theo Chalmers on SKY 200 in the U.K (Oct 2011)

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

http://drjudywood.com/

NOVEMBER 21, 2011 UPDATE

Here's a couple of other recent/excellent interviews with Dr Wood while she was in the UK:

Weather Derivatives and Geoengineering Chemtrails

2011-11-09T11:50:00.004-06:00

Why In The World Are They Spraying?

http://theintelhub.com/2011/10/11/why-in-the-world-are-they-spraying/

The Intel Hub
Michael Murphy
October 11, 2011

The American Association for Aerosol Research Conference Provides More Clues About Chemtrail/Geoengineering Programs

Could the agenda behind chemtrail/geoengineering programs be more than what geoengineers are admitting?
As awareness of these damaging programs increases around the world, theories about them include weather control, population control, morgellons disease, food control, etc. On October 3-7, 2011, scientists from around the world gathered in Orlando, Florida for the American Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR) conference.

The lectures at this conference included; “Air Quality Modeling”, “Health Disparities”, “Ambient Air Particle Pollution”, and an area of particular interest to many who are aware of the chemtrail/geoengineering issue, “Aerosols, Clouds and Precipitation”.

While geoengineering was not the main focus of the event, some of the lectures provided vital clues as to what some of the true agendas of these damaging programs might be.

As was exposed in the groundbreaking documentary, “What in the World Are They Spraying?”, Geoengineer’s models include spraying 10 to 20 million tons of toxic aluminum oxide and other aerosols into our atmosphere for the stated goal of cooling the planet.

While geoengineers insist that their models are to cool the planet, studies suggest that adding aerosols into our atmosphere can create a temporary regional cooling at the cost of an overall warming of the planet as the aerosols create a blanket and trap heat.

These studies contradict the very premise of geoengineering which leads many to ask the question, what are the true reasons for these programs?

Geoengineers also insist that these programs are only in the developmental stages however, mounting evidence suggests on-going deployment as we continue to see dramatic changes in our skies, our weather and the amount of aluminum and other aerosols in our atmosphere.

“Aerosols, Clouds and Precipitation Interactions: Anthropogenic and Natural Effects”, was one of the lectures that discussed how aerosols in our atmosphere can affect weather. The lecture covered the role of aerosols in cloud and precipitation formation.

The first part of the lecture discussed the brightening of clouds associated with increases in aerosols that serve as cloud condensations nuclei. This appears to be directly related to chemtrail/geoengineering programs because, the lecture discussed how different aerosols will distribute cloud water among smaller droplets and more effectively reflect solar radiation.

Also discussed was the fact that increases in atmospheric aerosols will lead to the increase of cloud lifetime, the reduction of precipitation efficiency and the removal of cloud water.

From this lecture and many other well documented studies, we know that putting certain aerosols into our atmosphere will not only reflect the sun but also affect a cloud’s ability to produce rain and thus the increase and decrease of rain fall in certain regions.

Dr. Hui Su of NASA, a participant at the Aerosol and Precipitation Symposium, was asked if she has noticed a considerable increase in stratospheric aerosols. She replied by stating that she has noticed a significant increase but has not measured the composition of the aerosols.

This observation was also noted in a recent study by the National Ocean Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). While both have failed to acknowledge the source and composition of these particles, evidence points towards ongoing stratospheric aerosol geoengineering programs.

Dr. Su went on to say that putting aerosols in the stratosphere impacts temperatures, water vapor and clouds leading to droughts and other negative consequences to our atmosphere including ozone depletion.

When asked about the idea of adding aerosols into the atmosphere from geoengineering programs, she stated the idea is “scary” and concurred that it could give governments and corporations the ability to corporatize and thus control our weather.

At the AAAS meeting in 2010, geoengineers boasted about their ability to heat up over 400 square miles of our atmosphere. According to aerospace expert Mark McCandlish, heating up parts of the atmosphere can create artificial high pressure and low pressures systems and thus give these entities the ability to steer storms.
In order to heat up the atmosphere, a conductor is needed. While aluminum is not a great conductor in wire, it is a very effective conductor in the sky because of its light weight and other properties.

Perhaps this is why we continue to see increasing amounts of lightning along with increases of aluminum in rain tests around the world.

Who benefits from weather modification and weather control programs? Weather began to be traded as a tradable commodity at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in 1997. Interestingly enough, this is when many believe chemtrail/geoengineering programs began their full-scale deployment. Major commodities are directly affected by weather and temperatures.

Predicting these trends could be very profitable to certain individuals who have the ability to control or manipulate our weather. Also, as discussed in Introduction to Weather Derivatives, there has been a recent birth of another new market, catastrophe options.

According to Chicago Mercantile Exchange Trader Michael Agne, when investing in these types of derivative options, corporations in the energy and insurance business would stand to make profits from certain catastrophes, however it should be noted that these derivatives would most likely be used as a hedge to their existing business risks and any gains would be used to offset insurance payouts or other types of inherent risk.
At least that is the intent of most futures derivative contracts, to hedge certain types of risk. However, this does not rule out the plausibility of excess gains above and beyond the offsetting of potential inherent business risks.

He went on to state that it is most likely possible that certain groups would be able to amass capital gains through the use of these derivatives.

While the idea of corporations chasing profit at the expense of the general public is nothing new, it seems to indicate an even broader agenda to chemtrail/geoengineering programs.

As we see the corporate take-over of our land, water and other natural resources, is it possible that they also intend to take over the world’s weather? While weather modification has been used to create rain in specific areas for years, weather control seeks to usurp the authority of nature and completely control the Earth’s weather systems.

As a matter of fact, corporatization/control of our weather has long been a stated goal of the U.S. corporate military as discussed in “Owning the Weather in 2025”.

Iran’s controversial president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stated that Western countries were using technology to suppress rain from his country and other parts of the world to create drought.

Why would governments be interested in creating droughts in other parts of the world? If we examine the goals of the corporate elite who have stated that their agenda is to consolidate power into the hands of a few by creating world government, we begin to see how weather control is essential in bringing this agenda to fruition.

Weather control can be used as a weapon as it gives certain governments the ability to create drought and famine in other regions. This can destroy a countries ability to grow food and thus remain sovereign and independent. When a country is desperate for food, it will allow other governments to impose their rule and authority upon it in exchange for rain and other resources.

This is the basis of the Hegelian dialectic, problem-reaction- solution. The problem is little or no rain, the reaction is starvation and desperation, the solution is given by the entity that has the ability to send rain and/or GMO seeds that grow in drought conditions.

Geoengineering has the potential to not only be an effective weapon of war, but it can also give corporations, certain governments and, as stated by Geoengineer David Keith, “give(s) man God-like power.”

While geoengineers continue to claim that their damaging programs are designed to save the planet from global warming, overwhelming evidence points towards the consolidation of power into the hands of a few by controlling natural systems and resources.

As we continue to see an increase of aluminum related illnesses and eco-systems around the world collapse, we need to ask the question, is allowing man to have God-Like power a good idea? We also need to ask if we are willing to suffer the consequences of continuing to live in on a planet where every breath that we take is filled with aluminum oxide and other damaging particles.

It is incumbent for those of us who are aware of this issue to take a stand and demand our God given right to live in a natural, healthy environment.

For more interviews, articles and films from Michael J. Murphy go to: truthmediaproductions.us. Also, for more information about chemtrails/geoengineering go to: coalitionagainstgeoengineering.org and geoengineeringwatch.org.
Michael J. Murphy
www.TruthMediaProductions.us
www.facebook.com/WhatintheWorldAreTheySpraying
www.CoalitionAgainstGeoengineering.org/

Comments

KEVIN O says:
October 11, 2011 at 2:42 PM
STOP CHEMTRAIL SPRAYING>SPRAYING HARD OVER MAUI THESE DAYS!!
Reply
Peter Kirby says:
October 11, 2011 at 3:09 PM
Interesting stuff, Michael. You’re making me think now that it originally comes from European banking families and their eugenicist academics, then the day to day management is done by weather derivatives market participants who work with our military. That would be the classic good old boy network, wouldn’t it? If this is true, then our military probably has guys working as liaisons to the weather derivative markets. All paid for by the American people digging their own graves.
Reply
M A says:
October 11, 2011 at 3:31 PM
I’ve written so many letters with no response. EPA,DNR,Politicians etc. Finally I got a letter back from my useless congressman Doc Hastings. As expected he listed all the usual corrupted agencies, NASA,EPA,NOAA,FAA,saying these agencies “have found there is no scientific evidence that chemtrails exist” (yeah I know the word is taboo)
However you do get the same non-response if you call them by their Christian name: “Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering” and Con. Hastings knows this.
He sent me a link to an EPA document he said they supposedly published “in response to all the inquiries.” The document however is dated September2000 before chemtrails evolved to the destruction I’ve photographed. These are no mere ‘trails’ any longer. Here is the document if you like to collect sanitized documents: http://www.epa.gov/oms/regs/nonroad/aviation/contrails.pdf
there are photos and diagrams in color even…oh wow. The usual bs about water vapor etc. (So why didn’t the EPA at least reply by email and send this link?)
I don’t know what else to do. No one answers or seems to care. My NW state must be in one of the cold areas mentioned. (weather never settled and nights were 38-40 degrees off and on all summer) Commercial farms were a month late on most everything. Everyone I asked said their vegetable gardens have been getting sicker every year for the last 8 years or so. Progressively worse. I’ve printed up pdf files from online, scientific, military etc, not simply opinion, included photos, and copy of the movie to make a good report in a bound notebook and sent that off to Congress. NO REPLY.
Reply
MontgomeryScott says:
October 11, 2011 at 8:19 PM
This article is clear, concise, and makes several logical links to the dual benefits that the PTP see as ‘beneficial to them’.
I had previously read about the ‘Weather Derivatives’ trading tranche, some years ago, but had in fact forgotten about this element of the scheme. I appreciate the reminder, Micheal J. Murphy.
The Pinal Airpark, in Pinal County, Arizona, houses a few (hundred) of these aircraft, courtesy of ‘Evergreen International’, ‘Aviation division’. Their primary bragging rights are that they convert aircraft into aerial spraying platforms, their most recent being the conversion of the 747-200 series into an aerial spray platform (this info is on their homepage website). THEY were also the private aviation firm responsible for shuttling the senators and Congressmen and President into occupied Iraq, after the ‘Mission Accomplished’ thingie.
MOST of these aircraft are twin-engine (at the tail), painted WHITE (with no markings), and, i believe, contracted by the CIA (as Evergreen has a long history of doing, ever since 1978 or perhaps prior, starting with the ‘Air America’ black operations program). Old L10-11′s, D.C.10s, D.C. 9s, and the like, are most frequently observed over my ‘airspace’.
(At LEAST, this is the primary progenitor within the 48-state CONUS)
You will have to do your own research, and come to your own conclusions, regarding my highly-educated opinion on this matter.
Thank you for allowing me to post.
MontgomeryScott
Reply
- scott owsley says:
  October 12, 2011 at 12:06 PM
  One of the more recent BUG vids had Mr (unincorporated) Owens and his travelling companion explain, with conviction, the real reason for aerial aerosols: to mediate (or promulgate) glacial melting due to the lack of the ozone layer burnt from nuclear fallout. I’m not clear on the motivation (to speed or slow melting) or science, so if Bob Tuskin can ask Scott to further explain….
  Thanks in advance
  Reply
  - Mike Kent says:
    October 14, 2011 at 8:09 AM
    Scott Owen (BUG) from believersunderground has talked about this at length. This chemtrail phenomena is known as the “Shield of Ra” project, Google it!
    Reply
- Frag Tal says:
  October 12, 2011 at 1:25 PM
  Has anyone given any thought to the potential interactions between the metal nano particles being injected into the atmosphere, and HAARP excitation? I suspect that would be research rich with potential…but I lack the background to pursue this!
  Reply
AntiLieGuy says:
October 13, 2011 at 6:27 AM
Not only does the article lie by omission, the comments are lies or idiots. The chemtrails are hiding Planet X and thats why theyve sprayed every day globally for the past four years. Planet X is causing the exponential rise in seismic and volcanic activity and is why the treasonous governments have been building underground cities like mad since they announced they found Planet X in 1983.
Reply
George says:
October 13, 2011 at 8:46 AM
Seems a lot of people are aware, concerned, and educated about this spraying. Yet, as with everything with a confrontation, which this is on the people of the entire planet, nothing ever changes or will make things better until the people decide to act accordingly. Fight fire with fire.
Reply
Jenna says:
October 15, 2011 at 12:06 PM
Michael-
Thank you for taking the time to write this. I have shared it with others who have made positive comments and enjoyed your post. Keep up the good work.
Reply

It Is Well With My Soul

2011-11-05T17:02:00.002-05:00

Received this email from a wonderful friend today. Had to post and add the video - thanks Leda!

"All is Well With My Soul" by Horatio G. Spafford

This hymn was written after two major traumas in Spafford’s life. The first was the great Chicago Fire of October 1871, which ruined him financially (he had been a wealthy businessman). Shortly after, while crossing the Atlantic, all four of Spafford’s daughters died in a collision with another ship. Spafford’s wife Anna survived and sent him the now famous telegram, “Saved alone.” Several weeks later, as Spafford’s own ship passed near the spot where his daughters died, the Holy Spirit inspired these words. They speak to the eternal hope that all believers have, no matter what pain and grief befall them on earth.

When peace, like a river, attendeth my way,
When sorrows like sea billows roll;
Whatever my lot, Thou has taught me to say,
It is well, it is well, with my soul.

Refrain:
It is well, with my soul,
It is well, it is well, with my soul.

Though Satan should buffet, though trials should come,
Let this blest assurance control,
That Christ has regarded my helpless estate,
And hath shed His own blood for my soul.

My sin, oh, the bliss of this glorious thought!
My sin, not in part but the whole,
Is nailed to the cross, and I bear it no more,
Praise the Lord, praise the Lord, O my soul!

For me, be it Christ, be it Christ hence to live:
If Jordan above me shall roll,
No pang shall be mine, for in death as in life
Thou wilt whisper Thy peace to my soul.

But, Lord, ’tis for Thee, for Thy coming we wait,
The sky, not the grave, is our goal;
Oh, trump of the angel! Oh, voice of the Lord!
Blessed hope, blessed rest of my soul!

And Lord, haste the day when my faith shall be sight,
The clouds be rolled back as a scroll;
The trump shall resound, and the Lord shall descend,
Even so, it is well with my soul.

LISTEN NOW (minus 2 verses)

Rewriting History: Who's Telling the Truth?

2011-10-21T13:09:00.001-05:00

Are we being told the truth or are lies and deception filling the airwaves through various news outlets?

GADDAFI
Yesterday, we were told that Muammar Gaddafi was killed, however, some don't think this is true and believe he is still alive: http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/10/gaddafi-is-alive-not-dead.html

HITLER
In 1945, the world was told that Adolf Hitler committed suicide in Berlin, Germany, but authors Simon Dunstan and Gerrard Williams compiled extensive evidence which says Hitler fled Berlin and took refuge in a remote Nazi enclave in Argentina: http://www.amazon.com/Grey-Wolf-Escape-Adolf-Hitler/dp/1402781393

MOON LANDING
In 1969 many of us watched on tv the first man to walk on the moon. Did we really put a man on the moon and bring him safely back to earth? Not according to many sources like this one: http://nasascam.bravehost.com/

What else, one has to wonder?

As a result of all this, I no longer watch (nor own) a television.

Any news that does come my way usually via internet, I read skeptically.

So what is the truth?

Good question and here is Truth that really matters!

THE TRUTH
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
From John 3

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, [then] are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
From John 8

Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
From John 14

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. ut they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all [men], as theirs also was.
From 2 Timothy 3

Christian Rock and Satanic Music

2011-10-18T21:25:00.006-05:00

SOURCE: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/devils_music.htm

What About Christian Rock?

“Christian Rock? There ain't no such animal!” —Evangelist Lester Roloff

"People there are, not a few, who have pipe organ abilities and make no more music for the causes of Christ than a wheezy saxophone in an idiot's hands."

—Dr. R.G. Lee (from the needful sermon, PAYDAY SOMEDAY)

Christian Pop and Rock has never led anyone to anything but worldliness. I am so wearied with professed Christian singers who claim to want to reach others for God, while getting rich and never taking a stand for anything. I'd much rather listen to honest heathen singers any day, than to listen to dishonest CCM rockers who masquerade as Christians.

Consider the words of Daniel 3:10, “Thou, O king, hast made a decree, that every man that shall hear the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, and dulcimer, and all kinds of musick, shall fall down and worship the golden image.” Could it be that by fostering a global homogenized music style—a style that is increasingly visible in the false Christen music culture—that the stage is being set for all nations and religious backgrounds to unite in worship of the BEAST, i.e., the Antichrist. Yes, it is happening indeed!

All Satan's Apples Have Worms!

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." —1st John 2:15
Believe it or not! Here's Amy Grant, on the Michael W. Smith, In Concert (Reunion Records, 1985) video tape flashing the El Diablo “Satanic salute.” Amy flashes the "satanic salute" at least two separate times on the video, displaying it for several seconds. There is a definite spirit invoked in Rock music, secular or Christian — and it's NOT the Holy Spirit! And many times, people involved in Rock music get caught up in its unholy spirit!
Christian Rock is not evil because they use modern instruments. It's evil because they lure Christian kids into worldly music through worldly associations. Every teenager wants to emulate their music idol—whether it be Amy Grant's pot smoking, Stryper's cross-dressing or Marsha Stevens' ministry, BALM, Born Again Lesbian Music. That's the main issue. It is not sinful to have a guitar in a church service. In fact, in can be quite appropriate if done tastefully. The same is true of drums and other instruments. I'm 100% against the CCM (Contemporary Christian Music) INDUSTRY, which is controlled by the New World Order as are all the other music industries. I am unalterably against the BUSINESS of Christian Rock Music, which is committed to Satan's New World Order.
I condemn no one, for we are all guilty, dirty, rotten, hell-deserving sinners. I am simply taking a Biblical stand for God against so-called Christian Rock music and those who publicly parade wickedness.

CCM is So Dangerous because of Where it Is Taking the Fans (into Apostasy)!

The Evil CCM Industry (occult-controlled)
World Vision Promotes Population Control Agenda (The number one agenda of the evil Global elite is Population Reduction. It is sad, but true, that many Christians think it's a good idea. What gives you or I, or anyone else, the right to decide who should be able to have children or not? Max Lucado, Third Day, TobyMac and Michael W. Smith are all going on tour around the country as of the fall of 2010. They're calling it the Make A Difference Tour 2010. Do you know who is sponsoring them? World Vision, a bogus religious organization that is a front for Population Reduction. You'll see the World Vision logo at the bottom of the Make A Difference Tour website.
What is So Wrong with Contemporary Christian Music [CCM]? (You're headed the wrong way! CCM is a controlled industry by New World Order promoters.)
Jeff Godwin's Website (Freedom Ministries)
What's Wrong with Christian Rock? (Free Video)
Christian Rock Music Exposed: Part 1 Part 2 Part3
Christian Music Guidelines — Music Philosophy (many more articles on www.av1611.org)
An Honest Letter From A Secular Industrial Musician (Christians wake up!)
CCM Musician Exalts Pope and Tradition Equal With Scripture
Pope Benedict in 2005 Taught That No Biblical Faith is Necessary to Be Saved (Good luck trying to find even one CCM singer who criticizes the Catholic religion. Sadly, most ARE Catholics! What a bunch of woeful sellouts! They want fame, praise and money; but THE TRUTH is not spoken by any of them. And so the lost and dying world continues to go to Hell fire.)
I Have More Respect for Marilyn Manson Than I Do for TobyMac, Michael W. Smith and Third Day!
Charismatic Music Permeating the Churches
Christian Rock - Blessing or Blasphemy? -by Terry Watkins
Christian Rock Music - Christian or Satanic ?
Christian Rock Or An Excuse for Christians to Rock ? - DC Talk Examined
Confusing Persecution With Correction
CCM Exposed
Whatever Happened to Godly Music?
Christian Music's Top Bottom
Crystal Lewis (Sings TRUST ME in bed scene)
Contemporary Christian Music and Rome
Amy Grant-Exposed! (Amy Grant says, "I’m a singer, not a preacher...I’M NOT LOOKING TO CONVERT ANYBODY")
Religious Rock (There ain't no such animal)
Johnny Cash-Exposed! (sings and promotes Danzig!)
Marsha Stevens is of the Devil (1st John 3:18)
"Christian" Rock -Paganism in the Church
Carman Exposed!
Online Database Articles on Music
Jesus Freak? (This is very disrespectful to God)
"Christian" Rap/Rock, in Jesus' Name
Top "Christian" Music Artists (hit rock bottom in God's eyes)
DC Talk and Marilyn Manson | Dc Talk Exposed
TobyMac Exposed! (Sings devil's music in Jesus' name)
tobyMac's Music is of the Devil
Welcome to the Freak Show (DC Talk's "Jesus Freak" video is blasphemous against Christ. Jesus Christ is NOT a freak Mr. McKeehan.)
The Philosophy of Contemporary Christian Music
Making Light of Jesus Christ - Freedom Ministries
Pop-Idiom Music in Worship and Evangelism - Peter Masters
Testimonies of Young People and Christian Rock - Dial-The-Truth Ministries
Dolly Parton Exposed (sings and promotes Led Zeppelin! Also read about Dolly's false gospel.)
Promoting Satan (Satan is working relentlessly to creep his way into every area of our lives, especially through music. Believers must TEST the spirits with the WORD OF GOD, 1st John 4:1)
Michael W. Smith EXPOSED!
Religious Rock; NOT, Christian Rock!
If the music is neutral, why did they dance? (a Battle Cry Article - If music is neutral, why did Russian youth dance during 'Christian' rock concert whose words they couldn't understand? It was the 'beat', not the message!)
Hip Hop from Hell
The Difference Between Good and Bad Music - by Alan Ives
Holy Soldier is Unholy! (professed Christians sing Led Zeppelin's hellish song "Rock-n-Roll")
Faith Hill EXPOSED! (She claims to be a spiritual Christian; but is featured in Playboy)
George Strait's Song "You'll Be There"
What's Wrong With Copying The World?
What's Wrong With My Excuses?
The Dragon's Hot Breath - Unmasking the Awful Truth About "Christian" Rock Music (by Pastor Texe Marrs)
"Christian" Rock is the Devil's Music
Religious Rock... The Music of Devils In The Church
The Unholy Legacy of The Beatles
Bill Gaither Promotes Homosexuality!
You Can't make Hip Hop Holy!
Beware of CCM Artist Derek Webb!
Rock 'n' Roll Worship Circus is of the Devil
Ooberfüse, the Pope and ChristianityToday (Pope Benedict XVI admits that music is being used to “construct a society,” a New World Order society, which embraces a one-world religion. Wake up!)
Christian Rock? (by Pastor David Sexton)
“COWBOY JUNKIES” Sing Their Hit Song, MISGUIDED ANGEL, Praising Lucifer!
What's Wrong With My Excuses ? -by Jeff Godwin
Rebecca St. James EXPOSED!
Jennifer Knapp—Another CCM Gospel Singing Lesbian (woe unto America!)
Apostate Christian Singer Ray Boltz Comes Out, Says He is Living a “Normal Gay Life”
Iris DeMent Sings for Satan (sings she's born-again, but she WILL NOT FORGIVE! She sings, “GOD MAY FORGIVE YOU, BUT I WON'T, AND I WON'T EVEN TRY!

What About P. O. D ? -by Terry Watkins
CCM's False Gospel (What a bunch of phonies!)
P.O.D.'s Blasphemous "Rasta" Jesus
What's Wrong With Christian Rock ? (video)
Katy Perry: Gospel Singer to Apostate
Mega Slutty, She-Devil, Hater of God — Katy Perry! (claims speaking-in-tongues is as normal to her as to say “pass the salt.” Says minister parents “channeled God” through tongues speaking.)
Unholy Hip Hop ... Satan in the Church!
What's Wrong With Christian Rock's Fruit ?
What's Wrong With Copying The World ?
Contemporary Christian Music and Euphoria!
MercyMe - Enemies of God!
Third Day - APOSTATES! (fools For Satan!)
CCM Band, THIRD DAY, Distorts the Biblical Meaning of Being “Born Again”!
KUTLESS
ZOEgirl
CCM Band, NEWSBOYS, Make God Vomit!
Avalon
Carrie Underwood Sings "Jesus Take The Wheel" (Underwood was recently featured in SELF Magazine's "Most Wanted Bodies.")
Professed "Christian" Rock Band, As I Lay Dying -Featured at Ozzfest 2005!
What's Wrong with Christian Rock/Rap?
Holy Hip Hop Exposed!
Christian Rock is Evil

Questions and Answers about "Christian" Rock

Will listening to "rock music" send me to hell?
Have you contacted the CCM artists according to Matthew 18:15?
How can CCM lift up the Lord Jesus and yet be wrong?
What about soft-rock music like Steve Greene and Twila Paris?
Isn't it better for Christians to listen to Christian rock than Secular rock?
But isn't music neutral?
But aren't you limiting God?
Why should the Devil have all the good music?
Didn't Martin Luther and General William Booth use bar tunes in their music?
How can you reach lost young people with the "old" hymns?
What about the "thousands" of people getting saved at CCM concerts?
What's wrong with using rock as a tool to reach young people?
Why don't you quit being so negative and show some love?
Aren't you doing more harm than good attacking other Christians?
Aren't you causing divisions among Christians?
What gives you the right to judge the CCM artists?
Are you doing this because you don't like rock music?
Does the Bible give any Guidelines for Christian Music?
Christian music buyers turned off to gruesome CD covers (A Battle Cry Article - As 'Christian' rock starts imitating secular performers, some CD covers have become so gruesome that buyers don't want to take them home.)
Gospel Imposter - Kurt Carr EXPOSED! (says, "God on Michael Jackson's side!")
Modern Worship? (Fake worship leaders)
Dyke Lesbian, Marsha Stevens, and her ministry BALM (Born Again Lesbian Music) EXPOSED!
RELIGIOUS ROCK... The Music of Devil's in the CHURCH!!!
The Music of Balaam
STRYPER is of the Devil
DISCIPLE Exposed!
CCM Hippie Freaks
The Barren CCM Industry
Jars of Clay are of the Devil
HARD MUSIC Magazine Exposed!
Proof that Christian Rock is of the Devil
Rock Music and Witchcraft
Christian Pop Sell-Out Jonny Diaz (CCM singers promote religion without truth)

Jesus never taught anybody to have a singing ministry, nor does the Bible anywhere teach it. Ephesians 5:19 speaks of singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord. This does not mean that recorded music is wrong; but something is VERY, and obviously WRONG, when professed Christians claim to love God, while SELLING their music, making much more money than they donate, and everything is FOR SALE. Jesus never sold anything, nor did John the Baptist, nor the early church. But today's apostates want to make money from everything they do, exploiting the name of Jesus to make a buck. Who's kidding who? You cannot serve money and God (Matthew 6:24). It's one or the other!

Furthermore, EVERY CCM group today promotes demonic Ecumenicalism — breaking down all social, religious and racial barriers in an attempt to unite everyone. TobyMac “wants to start a revolution, one that will sweep through cities and erase the divisive lines that keep people and cultures apart.” There is no such command or teaching in the Bible. TobyMac is pulling on the same rope as the Devil, trying to unite humanity once again as in the days of Babel, without God. What America needs is Biblical REVIVAL, not REVOLUTION!

The Bible can be summed up in one word—TRUTH (John 17:17). It is that very TRUTH that is woefully missing in CCM music today. Everyone is afraid to take a stand, lest they suffer reproach for the name of Christ (2nd Timothy 3:12), and their fans turn on them (John 15:19). As churches are becoming more worldly, so is the world becoming more churchy. Apostasy has set into our churches like rigor mortis.

Does This Look Like Jesus is Getting the Praise?

Take a good look at the photo to the right and decide for yourself if it looks like Jesus is being praised here. Why all the multicolored lights? It looks like a nightclub!
Do you think Christ is being honored when professed "Christians" strut across a stage, with flashing strobe lights, blasting guitars, worldly dress, and CHARGE people money to hear them "present the Gospel"? What a bunch of phonies!
How can Avalon claim that their goal has always been "to bring the Gospel of Jesus Christ to people through music"; BUT, then charge people to hear their music. Is the Gospel for sale?
And why don't they freely share the Gospel on their website with their fans? It's all about money! It is an insult to God for anyone to claim to sing the Gospel, and charge people money to hear it. Who's kidding who?

Take the Contemporary Christian Music Test
The Devil's crowd knows "rock" is Evil...
David Bowie:
"Rock has always been THE DEVIL'S MUSIC. . ." (Rolling Stone, Feb. 12, 1976)
John Lennon:
"I've sold my soul to the DEVIL." (Ray Coleman, Lennon, p.256)
Little Richard:
"I'm the Rock 'n Roll singer that you heard about through the years. . . I was directed and commanded by another power. The power of DARKNESS. . . The power of the DEVIL. SATAN." (Charles White, The Life and Times of Little Richard, pp. 205-206)
Christian Rap
TobyMac Exposed (lead singer of DC Talk — a servant of Satan who calls himself a "Christian")
DC Talk's Jesus Freak Video (learn the sickening truth)
"People there are, not a few, who have pipe organ abilities and make no more music for the causes of Christ than a wheezy saxophone in an idiot's hands." -Dr. R.G. Lee (from the needful sermon, PAYDAY SOMEDAY)
The Satanic Salute from P.O.D.'s album.

There is NOTHING even remotely Christian about Amy Grant.
Stryper
Fanny Crosby is the greatest hymn writer that ever lived, writing over 9,000 songs! Before Fanny got saved, at 45 years old, she wrote many secular songs. But after she got saved -things were different...Here's what Fanny said about mixing Christian and worldly music:

"Sometimes I need to reject the music proposed for my songs because the musicians misunderstand that the Fanny Crosby who once wrote for the people in the saloons has merely changed the lyrics. Oh my no. The church must never sing it's songs to the melodies of the world."
- Fanny Crosby

And do you know why Fanny Crosby said that - because Fanny got saved! And God "hath put a NEW SONG in my mouth, even PRAISE unto our God" inside the NEW Fanny Crosby! Fanny Crosby wrote over 9,000 songs to the Lord! Fanny used over 200 different pen names because she wanted to make sure God got the glory and not her.
Praise Him! praise Him! Jesus, our blessed Redeemer!
Sing, O Earth, His wonderful love proclaim!
Hail Him! Hail Him! Highest archangels in Glory;
Strength and honor give to His holy name!
Like a shepherd, Jesus will guard His children,
In His arms He carries them all day long;
Praise Him! Praise Him! Tell of His excellent greatness;
Praise Him! Praise Him! Ever in joyful song!
-- Fanny J. Crosby

There is no such thing as “Christian” rock music. Just as there is no such thing as “Christian adultery” or “Christian homosexuality.” When it is rock, it is not Christian. There is only one “Christian rock” and “THAT ROCK WAS CHRIST” (1st Corinthians 10:4).
“For their rock is not as our Rock...”
—Deuteronomy 32:31
"Take thou away from me the noise of thy songs; for I will not hear the melody of thy viols. But let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream." —Amos 5:23,24

--- end ---

WARNING! DISTURBING FOOTAGE VIDEO: THEY SOLD THEIR SOULS TO ROCK N ROLL

ARTICLE: Mind Control in the Field of Art by Wes Penre, June 15, 2000

--- end ---

OCTOBER 20, 2011 UPDATE

Accidental or Pre-Planned Events?

2011-10-14T11:29:00.005-05:00

Everyone needs to watch the 1997 flick 'Wag the Dog'...

SOURCE: http://alternativenewsreport.net/tag/wag-the-dog-reality/

Wag the Dog reality

Two Days Before Jared Loughner Shot Giffords, Grey’s Anatomy Aired “Disarm” Episode: Shooter’s Character Was Named “Jerod”

"Wag the Dog" Movie Poster

Posted on January 26, 2011 by CK Hunter
Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

I have been trying to convince readers, friends and neighbors for over 20 years that many history making “accidental events” in our society are in fact preplanned and orchestrated.

Whether people are ready or willing to face it or not, the fact is we are now living in a “Wag the Dog” NWO orchestrated reality in the United States, contrived by new world order ruling elites who own the world’s top mass media outlets, which they use to enforce their plans, motivations, trends, and objectives, in plain sight of a brain dead world populace, who are so debauched by now from over-exposure to the media onslaught that they fail to see what’s blaring right into their living rooms in plain view: the daily routine social engineering and psychological “programming” of human behaviors which are induced by these pop culture Illuminati designed behavior modification “instruction manuals”, cleverly disguised as television “programs.” If I have said it once, I have said it a thousand times, they call them television “programs” for a reason. Laugh if you will, but I am right, I know I am right and I will be proved right again on this one.

I was right when I endured mockery for nearly 30 years while I continued to publish and research the truthful facts that the Illuminati underpinnings of world culture is real, historical and still ever-present, only to finally have my research fully vindicated last year [finally!] by none other than “the History Channel‘s” airing of a TV show which outed the secret generational worship of Lucifer by Illuminati members in the highest positions in government, society and media. I was right, I knew I was right, and I had been right all along for 27 years. I know whereof I speak.

The desired behavior induction in the Grey’s Anatomy TV episode “Disarm” is obvious. The new world order elites desire greatly to disarm Americans, separating us from our guns so that they can proceed to separate us from what’s left of our constitutional rights and national sovereignty. They have already done this successfully in Great Britain and in Australia. They want to do it here, but alas it will never happen. The American people are too smart for the desired “social re-engineering” they have in mind, so they must resort to writing the plan into TV scripts like “Disarm” on Grey’s Anatomy.

My job of trying to convince my audience, friends and neighbors of this fact got just a little bit easier this evening. A brilliant Youtuber whose channel is named “jonah70757″ did a little bit of intelligent research and connected some huge dots. Great work Jonah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dzXyTKIUP0.

--- end ---

Whatsup? posts on Jared Loughner

The Vigilant Citizen

2011-10-14T11:03:00.005-05:00

Found The Vigilant Citizen website to be very interesting and informative...

Mind Control Theories and Techniques used by Mass Media

By VC | April 28th, 2010 | Category: Vigilant Reports | 672 comments

Mass media is the most powerful tool used by the ruling class to manipulate the masses. It shapes and molds opinions and attitudes and defines what is normal and acceptable. This article looks at the workings of mass media through the theories of its major thinkers, its power structure and the techniques it uses, in order to understand its true role in society.

Image source deesillustration.com

Most of the articles on this site discuss occult symbolism found in objects of popular culture. From these articles arise many legitimate questions relating to the purpose of those symbols and the motivations of those who place them there, but it is impossible for me to provide satisfactory answers to these questions without mentioning many other concepts and facts. I’ve therefore decided to write this article to supply the theoretical and methodological background of the analyzes presented on this site as well as introducing the main scholars of the field of mass communications. Some people read my articles and think I’m saying “Lady Gaga wants to control our minds”. That is not the case. She is simply a small part of the huge system that is the mass media.

CONTINUED...

Paranoid Schizophrenia or Mind Control?

2011-10-14T07:00:00.000-05:00

SOURCE: http://www.whale.to/a/paranoid_schizophrenia.html

Paranoid Schizophrenia
Mind Control

See: False Memory Syndrome Serial killers Schizophrenia

[2010 March] Peter Sutcliffe seeks release date as psychiatrist says conviction for murder was wrong The psychiatrist, who has treated Sutcliffe since 2001, said that it was the unanimous view of his colleagues that the Ripper was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia at the time of his crimes.

Covert Operations of the U.S. National Security Agency John St Clair Akwei The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyze electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer generated brain mapping can continuously monitor all of the electrical activity in the brain continuously. The NSA records and decode individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for brain-to-computer link (in military fighter aircraft, for example). For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject's verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain's auditory cortex, thus allowing audio communications direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this covertly to debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

According to what Nadine Scolla was told, half of the patients in mental hospitals are schizophrenics. A hefty percentage of these "schizophrenics" are really programmed multiples who are being quietly discarded by the system. How many victims of trauma-based total mind-control have ended up sent to mental hospitals? Many tens of thousands, maybe the exact number will never be known. America’s mental hospitals have also played an active role in the programming and the research for the programming. The Illuminati Formula 12. External Controls

One reason this technology has remained a state secret is the widespread prestige of the psychiatric Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV produced by the U.S. American Psychiatric Association (APA) and printed in 18 languages. Psychiatrists working for U.S. intelligence agencies no doubt participated in writing and revising this manual. This psychiatric "bible" covers up the secret development of MC technologies by labeling some of their effects as symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. Victims of mind control experimentation are thus routinely diagnosed, knee-jerk fashion, as mentally ill by doctors who learned the DSM “symptom” list in medical school. Physicians have not been schooled that patients may be telling the truth when they report being targeted against their will or being used as guinea pigs for electronic, chemical and bacteriological forms of psychological warfare. By Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD

I don't like the term "Wavie." It's a hard-hearted term which does not show any sympathy for the people who are suffering this way. They're suffering just as much as the people who have survived the so-called Project Monarch. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, I'll term them E-M Targets, E-M for electromagnetic spectrum, since the technical possibilities exist that they are experiencing bombardment by ELF, VLF, SHF microwaves, magnetic waves and other radiation of the electromagnetic spectrum which can be modulated so that voices can be heard inside the head, without implants, without speakers. Most of them have been diagnosed as being "Paranoid Schizophrenic..." but they are not, for it is possible to transmit electromagnetic waves to a human and stimulate the audio nerve circuits, thus creating auditory input whose source is external to the individual. OPERATION MIND CONTROL: The Cryptocracy's Plan to Psychocivilize You By Walter Bowart

"The literal explosion of 'schizophrenia' in the US in the early seventies was clearly due to a massive expansion of the Monarch Program here. I worked in a mental hospital before that and in the entire state there were only fifty or so people who were institutionalized with this diagnosis. Three years later there were at least ten times that number and the state mental hospital had been closed in the meantime."--Don Croft

"For many years, they were able to shut-up and quietly discard their programmed multiples by labelling them Paranoid schizophrenics.... Establishment shrinks helped cover up the programmed multiplicity for decades by labelling the programmed-multiple slaves "paranoid schizophrenics".---Fritz Springmeier

--- end ---

"Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross."
Philippians 2

Mind Kontrolled Masses: Panem Et Circenses & Doll Worship

2011-10-12T08:59:00.006-05:00

Here's a bit of the August 18, 2011 post from InTheKnow7 which gives us more insight to the ongoing mind control to which you and I are continually subjected.

HEADSUP: Please read with discernment and prayer as this information may be disturbing.

LINK: https://intheknow7.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/mind-kontrolle-for-the-masses-paneum-et-circenses-doll-worship-video/

2011/08/18 · 3:51 PM

Mind Kontrolled Masses: Panem Et Circenses & Doll Worship (VIDEO)

“All The World’s A Stage”

As You Like It, Act II, Scene VII – William Shakespeare

* * *

intheknow7 Channel

Esoteric Kitten & Big Screen Deception

ITK7 Journal 2011/3Q

4shared PICS/VIDS Archives (DOWNLOADABLE)

ITKEK7: MK Prog’mg In Culture

ITKEK7: Certified Monarch Slaves

ITK7GMT: Global Management Team

* * *

Bob Hope & U.S.O. Monarch Slave Troupe: Over 40yrs of MK-Ultra PIMPIN (VIDEO)

50yrs of MK (Mind Kontrolled) Ultra BETA Sex Kittens (VIDEO)

MK (Mind Kontrolle) Ultra Prog’mg Modes ID: “I Gotta See It” (VIDEO)

Monarch Butterfly (Danaus Plexippus)

* Overview of Mind Kontrolle Prog’mg here & here

Panem Et Circenses (=Latin “Bread & Circuses”) Strategy rulers (Global Management Team) use to keep subjects (useless eaters, weeds, public, American people etc.) distracted to divert attention from themselves. For if the masses turn their attention toward the rulers, becoming aware of their demonic schemes they would revolt IMMEDIATELY! This post highlights Mind Kontrolle Prog’mg of YOU AND ME rather than individual MK-Ultra Monarch Mind Kontrolle Prog’mg performed on secure military bases, select hospitals, universities and private castles and estates. They’ve been controlling us using DOLLS…
Techniques similar to those used to create Monarch Slaves have been applied to the general population. While we’ve been sleeping they created an army of Mind Kontrolled Slaves (human robots) to do their bidding; effecting changes in society need in order to perpetuate our gleeful servitude. These human DOLLS were infused into major spheres of society for us to mimic. This strategy has been given a major boost from technological advancements saturating our culture designed to keep “the programming” directly in front of the targets…
Our constant interaction w/these devices not only shields the puppet masters, but actually reduces the brains ability to reason. We don’t talk, we text…we don’t imagine, images are created for us, we think less as false arguments are presented, debated and resolved in minutes – sound bites rule. One can debate “man versus machine” ad naseum; moderator is not a technophobe, but readers should realize we’ve been programmed to be lazy, allowing computers to do almost everything for us. The mind in some ways is like any other muscle — if you don’t use it, you’ll lose it; it will atrophy. We’re losing simple skills like reading and counting at an alarming rate. Working a cash register used to require a quick mind in computation, now just press a button and in some cases w/pictures of items instead of words. This is part of the devolution of the human mind, always marketed as “convenience” or “progress” and those objecting are quickly demonized…

HOLLYWOOD & MEDIA (Doll Prog’mg)

Egyptian-Masonic crossed arms pose; "squared up"

Annual Tribute To MK-Ultra Mind Control, Monarch Slave Prog’mrs/Handlers, Egyptology & All Profiteers…

Our favorite Dolls are selected resulting from marketing/demographic data which measures emotional bonding levels. Then they simply present them at lavish ceremonies and grand stages (puppet shows) to tickle your emotions, and keep the cash registers ringing…

The Academy Awards (Oscars) ceremony is a virtual orgy of egotism and self-congratulatory rambling over how cleverly producers, directors, cameramen, script writers, agents et al. have “Spun The Kitty’s” (subjecting them to trauma) unsuspectingly for another year, while amassing even more ill gotten gains (blood money) using their dissociative identities (DID) and multiple personalities (MPD). They’ve been denied food, sleep, electroshocked, forced ingestion of psychotropic and hallucinogenic drugs, Botox-ed, surgically enhanced, layers of make-up, false lashes, luxurious hair extensions, sprayed-on tans, wrapped in the most exquisite gowns and shoes, adorned w/Harry Winston jewels, bathed in complimentary lighting, videoed from the most flattering camera angles – all to create an “image”of perfection; and of course the over-the-top emotional acceptance speeches delivered under Mind Control…

Behind the veil of beauty, beneath the multi-layered illusion of perfection, lie tortured souls longing for escape from a lifetime of misery…

Egyptian Origin of Oscar Statue

As we sit there mesmerized by tinsel town’s most glittering mass distraction, be mindful that after the show their torment begins anew, with endless after parties where “ANYTHING, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE w/ ANYONE” fun will be had w/BETA Sex Kitten ALTERS. The arrangements have all been made, which Monarch Slaves will attend which orgy (trauma reinforcement), at which estate (Prog’mg location), with whom and for how long. The pharmacists, physicians, Prog’mrs/Handlers, cameramen are all in place, on their marks (zap- zap) — lights, camera, action!

“and the Oscar goes to…”

Mass Mind Control Through Network Television – Alex Ansary

* * *

SEX DOLL PROGRAMMMING

Barbie & Hef: CIA-MK-Ultra Asset Playboy CEO & PIMP: Hugh Hefner & Human Plastic Barbie Dolls That Infected Generations

Sex Industry Doll Prog’mg

Norma Jean DiMaggio "Controlled Military Asset" Mind Kontrolled BETA Kitten

JFK, Marilyn Monroe, RFK

ITKEK7 Certified Monarch Slaves: Marylin Monroe

CONTINUED...

OUR HOPE

Fret not thyself because of evil [men], neither be thou envious at the wicked; For there shall be no reward to the evil [man]; the candle of the wicked shall be put out.

Proverbs 24:19,20

For what [is] our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? [Are] not even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming?

1 Thessalonians 2:19

Hoodwinked... Again

2011-10-09T08:35:00.008-05:00

Recently at Walmart picked up a $5 dvd of the 1997 black comedy, "Way the Dog" which shows how we the people are continually hoodwinked by Freemasons in Hollywood (Hollyweird), the mass media and the government.

So am posting the following piece to shed a bit more light on the nefarious deeds of your friendly neighborhood Masons.

Masonic Ritual Murders AKA Jack the Ripper

“Jack the Ripper is a misnomer," writes Stephen Knight beginning his landmark book, "Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution." "The name conjures up visions of a lone assassin, stalking his victims under the foggy gaslight of Whitechapel. It is just this mistaken notion, inspired almost solely by that terrifying nickname, which rendered the murders of five East End prostitutes in 1888 insoluble. For Jack the Ripper was not one man, but three, two killers and an accomplice. The facts surrounding their exploits have never before been teased from the confused skeins of truths, half-truths and lies which have been woven around this case." Likewise, the film "From Hell," partially based on Knight's book, is a horror movie and occult thriller-murder mystery, directed by Albert and Allen Hughes ("Menace II Society", "Dead Presidents") and written by Terry Hayes and Rafael Yglesias.

Based on the graphic novel of the same name by Alan Moore and Eddie Campbell, "From Hell" is a richly sculpted, fictionalized version of the suppressed history of England - how a cabal of Freemasons orchestrated the so-called "Jack the Ripper" murders.

In the movie, Inspector Fred Abberline (Johnny Depp) tries to make sense of the serial murders in a lower-class London ghetto plagued by poverty and violence. When he's not on the job, Abberline tries to deal with the death of his wife by soaking his sorrows in absinthe and opium. Chasing the dragon, he's stoned again, when he sees the grisly murders through his astral vision - a drug-induced psychic journey through the netherworld.

Tracking him down to an opium den, his obese sidekick Peter Godley (Robbie Coltrane) brings him back to consensus reality with a well-placed bitch slap.

Meanwhile, Mary Kelly (Heather Graham) and her hooker friends are being extorted by a gang of thugs.

Abberline follows the clues, leading him to a conspiracy at the highest levels of Government and Freemasonry -- Sir William Gull (Ian Holm), the Queen's physician, and Sir Charles Warren (Ian Richardson), Commissioner of Police and member of the Ars Quator Coronatorum Masonic Lodge - confidants to Queen Victoria herself.

A gripping, well-styled movie, "From Hell" is a bold revision of history based on Knight's ground-breaking research.

Historically, this cabal of high-level Masons was determined to "protect" the Monarchy - and preserve their own control of the Government.

After all, conspiracies of States are always informative because of the depths of depravity that show what men will do to preserve the status quo of the Ruling Class and Power Elite. In this case, the movie deftly illustrates that xenophobia and unvarnished hypocrisy are the hallmarks of the outwardly prim and proper Victorian Age. The flood of immigrants. The rising tide of socialism. The perceived threat of Catholicism to the Crown. The possibility of working-class uprising. These were all political factors in an age when the debauchery of the Ruling Class was a fact of life, as were the ruthlessness and corruption of the Crown.

"A great deal is at stake if the Establishment considers it necessary to operate a full scale cover-up," writes Knight. "For the truth of the Jack the Ripper affair to have been painstakingly concealed can mean nothing less than State security was at risk, or that someone high in the Government or the Royal Family was involved."

Author Stephen Knight, in his out of print masterpiece, "Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution," explains how Britain's entire political system at the end of the 19th century was threatened by the hidden facts -- Prince Albert Victor ("Eddy") was not only bisexual, but he had married a Roman Catholic girl and fathered a child with her. Evidently these debaucheries were so scandalous that the Ruling Class would not abide even the slightest hint of this revelation.

When a group of working girls (Annie Chapman, Marie Kelly, Elizabeth Stride and Mary Nichols) decided to blackmail the Royals, the Marquess of Salisbury, then Prime Minister, had to take care of the problem. He entrusted Sir William Gull, physician and abortionist to the Royal Family, for the mission.

One of the country's most prominent Freemasons, Gull understood that "Freemasonry was the power behind the Government and it was the unseen influence of the Masonic elders which dictated major policies, not the pleasing façade of Commons debate."

The deliberately engineered panic, i.e., the murder of five prostitutes, was done according to Masonic ritual. The ritual murder and disembowelment "met with such ghastly success because of the audacity with which they were executed," said Walter Sickert, Knight's informant whose painter-father had intimate knowledge of the Cleveland Street murders. This so-called "audacity" is a trademark of Masonic "mischief-making."

"Freemasons applaud violence, terror and crime, provided it is carried out in a crafty manner," writes Knight. "Humor is all important and the most appalling crimes may be committed under its cloak."

In fact, one of the key Masonic insights into human nature, says Knight, is the reaction of people to terrorism and serial ritual murders executed with great skill. In other words, people will marvel and say, "What a dirty trick, but how skillfully executed. What a swindle, but how well and with what courage it has been done."

This macabre sense of humor (or base insanity) is the trademark of Masonic Magick - to cause an effect, by an act so devilish yet cunning, that the entire world pays attention - while it's virtually terrorized and traumatized in the same collective gasp of horror.

"Ghoulish murders with a Puckish sense of fun" characterizes these atrocities.

(For example - how could they possibly drive those planes into the towers?)

"If Masonic supremacy appears in jeopardy, it is reestablished by a show of strength, by crimes of violence, perpetrated to demonstrate the continuing power of Freemasons for the benefit of Brothers abroad," writes Knight. "Crimes of violence would have been committed to reestablishing Masonic authority in the eyes of Masons everywhere."

"All Jack the Ripper victims were dispatched according to age-old Masonic ritual," Knight continues. The mutilations of the "unfortunates" were done according to Masonic tradition, the standard way of dealing with "traitors." In fact, the oath recited by initiates promises a ghastly death and mutilation -- in the case of "betrayal."

"From Hell" actually shows a Masonic ritual of initiation, and the candidate's recited vow of promised retribution in the case of his "betrayal" sounds like a dictation from the devil himself.

It is, after all, the standard Illuminati Two Fer (Two, Two, Two for the Price of One). In this case, Number One is to eliminate the blackmailers and witnesses, the prostitutes who knew about Eddie's indiscretions. And Number Two is to instill terror in the general populace by horrific murders (and "unsolved mysteries"), which traumatize the people into deeper submission and subconscious programming.

The "deliberately engineered panic" to which Knight refers has been used historically to shift the paradigm from a scam which is about to be uncovered to a new collective "concern."

The movie "Wag the Dog," of course, illustrates this concept with unsurpassed brilliance. Divert attention from a potential scandal (the President's sexual indiscretions) to a greater potential problem (a "manufactured" war) and the entire population is once again under a "hoodwink."

As Dr. Albert Mackey, a 33rd Degree Freemason writes in "The Encyclopedia of Freemasonry," a hoodwink is "a symbol of the secrecy, silence and darkness in which the mysteries of the art should be preserved from the unhallowed gaze of the profane."

In other words, when attention is diverted even for a nanosecond, the con artist (shell game practitioner, or magician) once again confuses his mark. The street-wise expression is simply "The House Always Wins."

Knight maintains that Inspector Abberline was historically part of the cover-up himself, and that the real "hero" was actually Ernest Parke, a twenty nine year old editor of the North London Press, "who pinpointed in his newspaper the deliberate mishandling of the brothel investigation and trial. He attacked the police not only for allowing one of the conspirators to escape to the Continent, but also for giving him so much time in which to do so that he managed to take his furniture with him. He attacked the court for passing a sentence of four months for Veck, who has been one of the worst offenders in an unsavory case."

Then Parke himself was charged with criminal libel in an unrelated case and sentenced to a year's imprisonment, effectively silencing him for probing much too deeply.

Though finding out that the "Jack the Ripper" murders, masterminded by Freemasons and perpetrated according to Masonic ritual, is an astonishing revelation to many people, the Whitechapel Murders are not the first to be attributed to Masonic skullduggery.

Freemason Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, who left the brotherhood in his later years, was allegedly poisoned for his "betrayal," as well as for revealing their esoteric secrets in "The Magic Flute."

William Morgan, author of a major 19th century expose of the Brotherhood called "Freemasonry Exposed," was murdered.

Film director Stanley Kubrick mysteriously died after his ritual-obsessed movie "Eyes Wide Shut" was completed.

And yes, Stephen Knight, author of "Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution" mysteriously died after his best-selling expose' "The Brotherhood: The Secret World of the Freemasons" was published in 1984.

The Craft is alive and (very) well on Planet Earth.

As a fictionalized account of the Ripper killings, "From Hell" gets closer to true history than any other work of fiction -- or even so-called "history" itself. It even shows the genesis of today's voodoo science and its bizarre obsession with psycho-surgery or lobotomies as well as cut-and-burn AMA-sanctioned "medicine."

Most importantly, "From Hell" shows, in gruesome detail, the deep long-standing connection between the world's most mysterious society and the world's most mysterious murders.

Conspiracy, after all, is not just "Business-As-Usual;" it's also "Government-As-Usual."

A Freemason Speaks

http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Masonic_Ritual_Murders.htm

Author Stephen Knight wrote one of the seminal books on freemasonry called 'The Brotherhood' in 1983. During the course of his research for this book he was introduced to a man known as 'Christopher', a mason of the highest 33rd degree ranking. In the Cafe Royal, London, Christopher showed him the papers demonstrating the authenticity of his masonic rank and told Knight that he was keen to "stop the rot" in freemasonry. Stephen Knight asked him what a person might have to fear from a group of influential freemasons if circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they were using masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.

'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "It is not difficult to ruin a man and I will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy and power attract such people, and when they come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen per cent now."

Stephen Knight: "Christopher explained that masonry's nationwide organization of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of masonic contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers. Post Office staff, doctors, government employees. Bosses of firms. A dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were indisposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with access to his bank manager. The 'good' mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow mason, especially a fellow lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the craft. Sometimes this information gathering process - often involving a long chain of masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be necessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him.

'Christopher', the 33rd degree mason: "Solicitors are very good at it. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him."

Stephen Knight: "Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because masonic DHSS and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly."

'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "Employers, if they are freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of masonry. At worst he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion. Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of an individual getting a particular job which I know about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.

"Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work against them. Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It's.... you see, I... you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of person's life. If they give in they go under. If they don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them. "There is no defense against an evil which only the victims and perpetrators know exists."

--- end ---

Enter not into the path of the wicked, and go not in the way of evil [men].
Proverbs 4:14

And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, [do] all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.
Colossians 3:17

John Lennon	Paul Kossoff	John Bonham
Elvis Presley	Jim Reeves	Steve Parson
Buddy Holly	Berry Oakley	Bob Marley
Otis Redding	Tim Buckley	Sal Mineo
Brian Jones	Jim Croce	Harry Chapin
Jimi Hendrix	Richard Earina	Brian Epstein, Beatles manager
Janis Joplin	Lenny Bruce	Brian Epstein, Beatles manager
Jim Morrison	Larry Williams	Michael Jeffery, Jimi Hendrix manager
Duane Allman	Bon Scott, AC/DC	Michael Jeffery, Jimi Hendrix manager
Mama Cass Elliot	Richie Valens	Rod McKernan, "Pig Pen" of the Grateful Dead
Gram Parsons	J. P. Richardson
Phil Oakes	Ronnie Van Zandt
Marc Bolan	Steve Gains	Donald Rex Jackson, Grateful Dead mgr.
Keith Moon	Sid Viscious	Donald Rex Jackson, Grateful Dead mgr.